I've seen mocks where one or both of Herbert and Tua slide. Neither are sure things and its very possible one or both of them slip into that 10-14 range, especially Tua since teams can't confirm he is medically sound. Not saying this is likely that one or both slide, but it is possible, just as it's possible one or both of Lamb or Jeudy go in the top 10. Regardless, you're still talking about a bold move up. To get near the 10th pick is probably going to require both 1st rounders. The price to move up to #5 is more, but if you're convinced the player you get there is your franchise QB, it's really not THAT much more in the big scheme of things.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:54 amYeah I’ll pass.VikingLord wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:25 am
If Spielman is so inclined to do something bold, I'd rather he go all the way and get Tua or Herbert.
1.) we’d have to trade within the top 10 to do that vs 10-14 for lamb or Jeudy. That means the asking price is that much more.
2.) I’ve said before we have way to many spots to fill and have a solid QB already in place. To trade up that far, give up that much just to get a guy that’s going to sit and lose other valuable draft picks just makes zero sense to me
3.) chances are, the cost of that would be both firsts, our second and probably more. So we wouldn’t be picking until let’s say the 3rd and filled zero holes. From the 3rd round on we’d have to find ways to fill CB (x2 possibly), WR, DT, DE, and OG (x2). Good luck
As to your 2nd point, Cousins is in place for 2 more seasons. His final year is voidable as I understand it. That is hardly a long term commitment on his or the Vikings' part at this point, and in terms of that bigger picture mentioned before, giving your franchise QB a year to sit and learn and develop while remaining competitive in the near term is sound strategy.
It seems a little odd to argue that it would take too much draft capital to move up to get your long term franchise QB on one hand and then turn around to argue that it because it would take slightly less draft capital to move up to get your long term #1 WR its OK because it will cost slightly less. The argument makes sense only when looked at from the perspective of immediate need (as in, the Vikings have their QB position locked up right now while they lack at WR with the departure of Diggs), but remember the draft after the Vikings traded Randy Moss. They went into that draft lacking a clear #1 WR due to the trade and also had an immediate need at DE. The QB position was "locked up" at the time, so no immediate need there. And they went on to draft Troy Williamson to replace Moss and Erasmus James to fill the DE need while ignoring Aaron Rodgers at QB *twice*. They didn't even have to make a trade to get him in that draft, either. They could have taken him just holding pat. We see how that worked out.
The draft is about the long-term view and adding the best possible talent to the team for that longer term. GM's who understand that thrive. GM's who see the draft as a way to plug immediate holes tend to fail unless they get really lucky.
I for one will be disappointed if the Vikings trade up to get a WR in this draft. Both lines need too much work to go after a flashy skill player in my view. As I'm not sold on a QB in this draft either, I'd personally they hold or even trade down and stock up both lines in the early rounds.