Options at QB

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

How would you attempt replace Bridgewater?

Sign Michael Vick
6
15%
Sign Nick Foles
1
3%
Sign Mark Sanchez
8
20%
Stick with Hill/Stave
13
33%
Trade for a player (Please specify)
12
30%
 
Total votes: 40

User avatar
Maelstrom88
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:38 am
x 411

Re: Options at QB

Post by Maelstrom88 »

I think Foles and especially Bradford would be good options. Bradford worked with Shumur before and was ROTY under him. I wouldn't want to give up anything more than a 3rd for Bradford or a 5th for Foles though.
mael·strom

a powerful whirlpool in the sea or a river.

a situation or state of confused movement or violent turmoil.
UKno1VIKING
Transition Player
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:36 pm
Location: Bradford, UK
x 11

Re: Options at QB

Post by UKno1VIKING »

My head says Zim will stay with Hill. And why not? his TD/INT are better than most of the backup's mentioned already. It shows he is more reliable. His big question mark, is how he stays on his feet with our o-line, as he's not the most fleet of foot.
But i've voted to trade for another QB. I think Zach Mettenburger has intriguing upside. He has good arm strength, and doesn't stare down 1 receiver constantly like others mentioned (especially aaron murray, he's like christian ponder 2.0).
Obviously the best scenario is AJ McCarron, but i cant see this happening.

Mettenburger for me. All or nothing faeces or bust time.
AlldayPotter
Backup
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:17 pm

Re: Options at QB

Post by AlldayPotter »

Mettenberger was just released I believe, so that option will now be even more cheap and possible.
User avatar
LondonViking
Backup
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:05 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Options at QB

Post by LondonViking »

Sorensen is flying back in, and Heinicke is ahead of schedule by a few weeks.

P.S. I voted Other. I want AJ McCarron also, but I know this is never going to happen. In that years draft I wanted Teddy, Mettenberger or AJ
Norv Zimmer
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 901
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:21 pm
x 5

Re: Options at QB

Post by Norv Zimmer »

Why would the Bengals trade their backup and leave them with zero depth? Makes no sense.
Norv Zimmer
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 901
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:21 pm
x 5

Re: Options at QB

Post by Norv Zimmer »

Hill is the quarterback this year, maybe Heineke later in the season. To think someone can come in and just pick up the system and have chemistry is just asinine.
User avatar
LondonViking
Backup
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:05 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Options at QB

Post by LondonViking »

Hill will be qb until he gets injured by a RDE.

Jest I know but I do fear for him on the blind side with little mobility aged 36
purpletinted66
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: Options at QB

Post by purpletinted66 »

we couldn't get that hoyer guy, could we? ooh i see the bears got him as their #2: dang.
Image
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: Options at QB

Post by PurpleMustReign »

Brett!

Cold is temporary. Purple Pride is forever.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Options at QB

Post by Mothman »

PurpleMustReign wrote:Brett!
:spanking:
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: Options at QB

Post by PurpleMustReign »

Mothman wrote: :spanking:
Lol, I knew i would get a reaction from you.

Cold is temporary. Purple Pride is forever.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Options at QB

Post by Mothman »

PurpleMustReign wrote: Lol, I knew i would get a reaction from you.
I knew you'd expect one... and I delivered, baby!
User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Re: Options at QB

Post by Texas Vike »

Norv Zimmer wrote:Hill is the quarterback this year, maybe Heineke later in the season. To think someone can come in and just pick up the system and have chemistry is just asinine.

This is the only rational thought in this annoying thread.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Options at QB

Post by Mothman »

Texas Vike wrote:
This is the only rational thought in this annoying thread.
I actually disagree. They could probably bring in a QB and get him up to speed by mid-season, if not sooner. He might not have a comprehensive knowledge of the system by then but he'd probably be able to run enough of the offense.

If the Vikes are going to make a move, unless they can get a good QB with experience running the system, I think they should make a move for a young guy with possible starting potential (like McCarron or possibly Aaron Murray, who might be easily affordable or perhaps even hit the open market soon). A young player like that (along with Heineke, if they believe he has sufficient potential) could learn the system this year and potentially compete next year.

As far as I'm concerned, the Vikings need to re-think their approach to this position. They need young competition for Bridgewater next year. If that competition isn't on the roster they need to draft someone to fill that role. They need to stop thinking the Cassels and Hills of the league are adequate backups and start developing more depth and a real "Plan B" at the position. Furthermore, they need to face the fact that Bridgewater may not be their future at QB. I know many don't want to hear that but this was an important season for him to demonstrate, unequivocally, that he could actually become the franchise QB they (and many fans) seem to believe he is already. Now he's losing a year of development, and a year of his contract, to an injury serious enough that it's unclear if he'll be able to even pick up where he left off next season. Hopefully, he'll make a full recovery and be ready to go next summer but even if he does, he'll be in the final year of his contract with yet more to prove.

This Vikings team has spent too many years putting all of their eggs in one basket at the QB position. They need to move forward as if their future at the position is uncertain, not as if this is just a year they have to get through and then their franchise QB will be back in place and all will be well. They need to do that because the future of the position remains uncertain.

Sorry, I know nobody wants to hear most of that but that's the harsh reality of the situation. Whether we thought the Vikings had a legitimate franchise QB or not, they don't clearly have one now.
TSonn
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2127
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:52 am
Location: Michigan
x 132

Re: Options at QB

Post by TSonn »

Mothman wrote: This Vikings team has spent too many years putting all of their eggs in one basket at the QB position. They need to move forward as if their future at the position is uncertain, not as if this is just a year they have to get through and then their franchise QB will be back in place and all will be well. They need to do that because the future of the position remains uncertain.

Sorry, I know nobody wants to hear most of that but that's the harsh reality of the situation. Whether we thought the Vikings had a legitimate franchise QB or not, they don't clearly have one now.
I agree. The silver lining to this whole situation is that hopefully it forces the Vikings to get some decent depth at QB for the foreseeable future. Best case scenario is they bring in a young guy like Murray, Mettenberger, Glennon, etc and he plays well this season. Then we'll have back-up options next year, trade bait, or a plan B if Teddy doesn't have a full recovery.

If we just roll with Hill as our starter and don't bring in anyone else, once we go 1-3 to start the year I'd rather tank the rest of it to grab a nice OL in next year's draft.
Post Reply