The offense looked different...Ponder sure didn't...Forget about stats, Ponder looked different than usual for the first three quarters, and it wasn't a matter of simply completing passes he used to miss.
No priase for Ponder?
Moderator: Moderators
Re: No priase for Ponder?
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: No priase for Ponder?
Problem is, it is 4 quarter game. So looking good for 3 of them only goes so far.Demi wrote: The offense looked different...Ponder sure didn't...
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
Re: No priase for Ponder?
It was just one game, against the worst pass defense in the NFL. Every once in a while even the bad quarterbacks give you something titillating to watch.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- x 1
- Contact:
Re: No priase for Ponder?
Yes, yes we should.majorm wrote:All I can think of reading this thread is how low our standards for QB play have gotten. When Ponder is a little better than his normal, pathetic self, we should PRAISE him?!! Okay. He wasn't a brutal as usual yesterday. Great job!!!
This actually made me smile. Thank you.


Re: No priase for Ponder?
Without reading the posts here, no matter how many or what QB's we have on the roster we CANNOT pass on the number of VERY talented college QB's that will be available in the 2013 NFL Draft. I think the Vikings will have the 4th pick or so, and I see the 2 Florida teams (Bucs & Jags) having the first 2 picks, Bucs will take Clowney, Jags will trade the pick. The Vikings with have either the UCLA Qb or Oregon QB to take, Bridgewater will not be there IMO.Will the Florida State QB hang around for another year? I dont want Manziel.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:28 am
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Re: No priase for Ponder?
Welcome aboard.720pete wrote:It was just one game, against the worst pass defense in the NFL. Every once in a while even the bad quarterbacks give you something titillating to watch.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

This space available for rent.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:28 am
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Re: No priase for Ponder?
I didn't miss the whole game, I took a nap and woke up early in the 3rd, which is rare for me to miss any of the noon games. The 2nd half seemed like it flew by, maybe it was just me. I honestly don't want to see it, because the ceiling isn't very high. This is the sort of play the Browns trot out, I don't want to be them. He will have flashes, as anyone will, don't be fooled by it, there are severe limits here.GBFavreFan wrote:
I think a lot of you towards the bottom of the page are replying to the subject line and not the actual post. If you missed the game, what you missed was a new strategy from the coaches for Ponder and it seemed to work. This wasn't about having an "average" game, or settling for jacksheet, or anything else these other posters are saying. Forget about stats, Ponder looked different than usual for the first three quarters, and it wasn't a matter of simply completing passes he used to miss. Hopefully you'll get to see the same thing this Thursday!
This space available for rent.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- x 1
- Contact:
Re: No priase for Ponder?
Glennon. Mike Glennon.Valhalla wrote:The Bucs almost won at Seattle, played real well. The Dolphins have this incident going on with the locker-room but I don't think it should take them off their game. Still, the Bucs are set against the Dolphins on Monday Night Football. Tampa Bay could see their first win. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/gametracke ... 111_MIA@TB . Tampa Bay probably has an "easier" stretch towards seasons end as well and their QB Lennon has done well enough.
Jax at Tennessee this weekend, if Jacksonville has any chance at a win, I'd look at games like this one.
And I'd be shocked if the Jags beat the Titans. Shocked.

-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: No priase for Ponder?
Ponder has ran for a few TD's lately, yeah. And it's why I always felt he was a better option over Cassel because of that element. However, he still doesn't progress in his reads and doesn't find the open receivers. One read and go or panic. He's not a starter in the NFL at this point. Period.
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: No priase for Ponder?
The hell is your point? Eli having a horrific year has nothing to do with Ponder's incapabilities of reading a defense.Valhalla wrote: Actually, when one sees a number of teams struggle to put a competent QB on the field, I am not sure one can say this.
Passer Rating, bettering Eli Manning at the moment, of course, this year is a blip on Eli's career in total.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/playe ... backRating
- PondertoJennings
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:25 pm
Re: No priase for Ponder?
When Ponder leads the team to a win is when I will give him praise. Right now the entire team gets nothing from me.





Re: No priase for Ponder?
Praise for Ponder? Are you kidding me? Praising Ponder for his less than average passing performance would be like praising the kid on the short bus for making it all the way to special ed without soiling himself.
You're such an apologist. It was exactly 3.85 seconds from the time of the snap to when he was stripped. That's nearly twice as long as the snap to release league average. I broke down a game earlier vs Cleveland where Ponders average pass was around 2.6 seconds and Hoyer was around 2.4 seconds. It's not rocket surgery, if you're backed up at your own EZ ... YOU GET RID OF THE BALL! I blame Muskrat more for not handing the ball to AD down there. It's incompetent to have a known putz like Ponder throwing from his own EZ and after PA no less. Inexcusable.Raptorman wrote:Yup, he should have gotten rid of at 2 seconds. From the time the ball was snapped to the fumble was about 3 seconds maybe 3.5. But, yeah, it's all his fault because the play called takes 4 seconds to develop and he had 3 seconds before the D line man was swatting at his arm. But hell, now I will be called a Ponder apologist. And pocket presence, how many QB can sense a D lineman coming at them from behind?
"Our playoff loss to the Vikings in '87 was probably the most traumatic experience I had in sports." -- Bill Walsh
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- x 1
- Contact:
Re: No priase for Ponder?
Me=MelanieMFunk wrote:
And I'd be shocked if the Jags beat the Titans. Shocked.


- Laserman
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
- Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
- x 14
Re: No priase for Ponder?
See how this "Game manager" philosophy works it's way even down the fans? now if the QB doesn't mess up bad he should be praised !! Wow, what a Loser philosophy. This mentality needs to be run out of town along with play not to lose, break but don't bend ect ect
Re: No priase for Ponder?
And then Kellen Clemens posts a better QB rating than Ponder HAS IN ALMOST THIRTY STARTS, and what the hell the point is bro?That Ponder is having a better year, that's what the hell the point is!!!\