Poor Greg Jennings
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
I don't feel sorry for him for a second. He took the money and knew what he was getting into...he was a 30 year old WR at the end of his career looking to cash in. If he wanted to put up stats and win, he would have taken the deal from Green Bay.
-
PacificNorseWest
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
This.Demi wrote:I don't feel sorry for him for a second. He took the money and knew what he was getting into.
-
King James
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1736
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
Ponder isn't the best deep ball thrower but isn't that what the fans wanted right? For Ponder to throw more deep passes this season. Yes those passes were ugly but I salute Ponder for atleast attempting to make some plays downfield. Last season he only completed TWO passes over 30 yards. This year, already in one game he complete a few big passes to Simpson and Jennings.
No, they were not pretty passes but for a guy who is just now trying to establish his deep ball accuracy, what would you expect???
No, they were not pretty passes but for a guy who is just now trying to establish his deep ball accuracy, what would you expect???
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
Just now?No, they were not pretty passes but for a guy who is just now trying to establish his deep ball accuracy, what would you expect???
It wasn't just the deep ball. He had that throw to Jennings, I guess a back foot throw? And then a couple other just horribly inaccurate ducks that were short passes. Deep ball...he wasn't even accurate on the short passes.
-
King James
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1736
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
1st half he was 6-9Demi wrote: Just now?![]()
It wasn't just the deep ball. He had that throw to Jennings, I guess a back foot throw? And then a couple other just horribly inaccurate ducks that were short passes. Deep ball...he wasn't even accurate on the short passes.
Second half he was 12-19.
He wasn't that inaccurate.
-
J. Kapp 11
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9856
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
- x 1891
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
At $10 million per year, Greg Jennings is anything but poor.

Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
did you watch the game? our receivers were having to make some incredibly accrobatic moves to catch those passes that were completed...JEC334 wrote: 1st half he was 6-9
Second half he was 12-19.
He wasn't that inaccurate.
Formerly AADPFan
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
Mike Wallace with 1 rec for 15 yards.....they won yet he still complained
-
King James
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1736
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
No I just made up these numbers in my head.AADPFan wrote: did you watch the game? our receivers were having to make some incredibly accrobatic moves to catch those passes that were completed...
I don't think people would complain about those throws had we won.
-
TeamChaplain
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:14 am
- Location: Mitchell, SD
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
I bet Jennings would love to have Cassel or even MBT throwing him the ball.
From the Fjords of ValHalla
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
Poor Greg Jennings is a multi millionaire. But I bet reality hit him real hard after trying to catch (and actually catching) some of Ponders throws.
-
dead_poet
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Poor Greg Jennings
Rough start for #Vikings' Greg Jennings
Other WRs on new teams were productive; the Vikings need to extend drives and target the ex-Packers star more as the season goes on.
Other WRs on new teams were productive; the Vikings need to extend drives and target the ex-Packers star more as the season goes on.
http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikin ... ign=BufferFrazier spent a large portion of his Monday news conference answering questions about offensive weapons that weren’t fired nearly enough. Of course, that’s going to happen when your team converts only two of 10 third-down situations, holds the ball for 23 minutes, 41 seconds and runs only 53 plays.
When it came to third-down conversions in Week 1, only the Browns (1-for-14) converted fewer than the Vikings. As far as number of plays, only the Panthers (49) and Chargers (51) ran fewer. And, yes, the Vikings’ total of 53 was exactly the number of plays that Chip Kelly’s hyper Eagles ran in the first half of Monday night’s game at Washington.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly