Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

The Breeze
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: So. Utah

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by The Breeze »

Mothman wrote:Ben Goessling writes about the Vikings depth at DT in the wake of the injury to Kevin Williams:

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_ ... ive-tackle
Greenway summed it up quite nicely.

That's too bad about Ballard. It would've been a great opportunity for him. Wonder what his deal is?
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by Mothman »

The Breeze wrote:Greenway summed it up quite nicely.

That's too bad about Ballard. It would've been a great opportunity for him. Wonder what his deal is?
My guess is it's a family issue of some sort but who knows?
Reignman
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1372
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:58 am

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by Reignman »

tnvikesfan wrote:When will it be our turn to do whatever WE want and win our game? When will the officiating be done in a FAIR manner, cheap shots being called when they happen to US? We have been the red-headed stepchild of the NFL long enough. If the officials won't make the calls, maybe our players can start defending their own.
Our turn is coming now that we got the new stadium ... oh wait, is the new stadium still a go? But yeah I think the league was trying to punish us for never having a state of the art stadium they could be proud of.
"Our playoff loss to the Vikings in '87 was probably the most traumatic experience I had in sports." -- Bill Walsh
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by Mothman »

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_ ... lliams-hit
We'll begin to move on from the Kevin Williams-Joe Looney play after this afternoon -- the Vikings are now about as close to their next game against the Tennessee Titans as they are to last Sunday night's game in San Francisco -- but I thought it would be worthwhile to add one more item to the discussion, from Vikings players Chad Greenway and Jared Allen on the double standard they believe exists on hits like these.
Allen's comments are interesting and he definitely has a point.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by dead_poet »

Purplemania wrote:Still, I say make it legal for everyone.
You remind me of Tosh's bit:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyyKLqlNTCM

:o
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
TheSpackler
Backup
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:44 pm
x 1

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by TheSpackler »

Mothman wrote:http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_ ... lliams-hit
Allen's comments are interesting and he definitely has a point.

Jared Allen has room to talk?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... s-low-hit/
Image
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by Mothman »

TheSpackler wrote: Jared Allen has room to talk?
Did you bother to read the article?
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

TheSpackler wrote:
Jared Allen has room to talk?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... s-low-hit/
Image
Umm yes?
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by PurpleMustReign »

TheSpackler wrote:
Jared Allen has room to talk?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... s-low-hit/
Image

Troll much?
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by Demi »

Purplemania wrote:If you don't know the difference between that hit and the one put on Williams...I've got bad news for ya.
They should both be illegal...they're both dirty cheesy hits that have no place in the game.
TheSpackler
Backup
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:44 pm
x 1

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by TheSpackler »

Allen needlessly ended Lance Louis' season and likely his career with that cheap shot, which had no bearing on the play.
Just Me
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6101
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:41 pm

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by Just Me »

TheSpackler wrote:Allen needlessly ended Lance Louis' season and likely his career with that cheap shot, which had no bearing on the play.
Where's the part where Allen takes out his knee? Did I miss it? :confused:
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
DanAS
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:29 am
x 1

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by DanAS »

Who cares if it was "legal"? Who cares if the Tuck Rule play was called "correctly"?

Both were horrible. Period.

As others have said, common sense should rule the day, not the past decisions of pointy-headed minds.
Just Me
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6101
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:41 pm

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?

Post by Just Me »

Purplemania wrote: I swear it's only a matter of time before players will get flagged for hitting too hard, even if the "hitting zone" was all legal :lol:
Already happened last year (IIRC). I think it was Robinson who made a tackle on a player while the play was still live where be basically body slammed the ball carrier to the ground. It was an "aggressive tackle" but Robinson was pulling the runner over his own body while taking him down. It looked like a hard tackle, but we've all seen those fluke tackles where the ball carrier lands on a defensive player (doesn't contact the ground) and bounces up to run for additional yards or a TD. I think Robinson was just trying to make sure some part of the carrier touched the ground. Again, it was a hard tackle, but IMHO legit, and he got flagged for "Unnecessary Roughness." I wish I could remember who we were playing...
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
Post Reply