Adrian Peterson

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
MV711
Backup
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Stamford, CT

Adrian Peterson

Post by MV711 »

Although I as well as countless Viking fans are thrilled with AD's rushing performance over his career, would the Vikings be wise to use him a little more as a receiver out of the backfield on screens, slants, etc. so as to utilize his speed and athleticism as well as to possibly increase this dimension to our offensive attack to our advantage?
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Mothman »

MV711 wrote:Although I as well as countless Viking fans are thrilled with AD's rushing performance over his career, would the Vikings be wise to use him a little more as a receiver out of the backfield on screens, slants, etc. so as to utilize his speed and athleticism as well as to possibly increase this dimension to our offensive attack to our advantage?

Yes.

I think Peterson has been under-utilized as a receiver over the course of his career and I'd like to see him used in that capacity more this season.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by dead_poet »

Mothman wrote:
Yes.

I think Peterson has been under-utilized as a receiver over the course of his career and I'd like to see him used in that capacity more this season.
I knew you'd be advocating for more check-downs, Jim. :wink: :twisted:
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by PurpleMustReign »

dead_poet wrote: I knew you'd be advocating for more check-downs, Jim. :wink: :twisted:

Jeez, Jim, what are you trying to do, run the Vikings into the ground?? :P
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Mothman »

dead_poet wrote:I knew you'd be advocating for more check-downs, Jim. :wink: :twisted:
:point:
mansquatch
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3836
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
x 117

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by mansquatch »

Wasn't there a thread last season all about Jim called "Check Down Charlie". I think Jim is secretly Bald Clueless, err I mean Brad Childress and the reason he sucked so bad on the sidelines was because he was busy on his iPhone responding to all the threads on this forum instead of you know, actually coaching.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Mothman »

mansquatch wrote:Wasn't there a thread last season all about Jim called "Check Down Charlie". I think Jim is secretly Bald Clueless, err I mean Brad Childress and the reason he sucked so bad on the sidelines was because he was busy on his iPhone responding to all the threads on this forum instead of you know, actually coaching.
The check down is the single greatest play in any NFL team's arsenal. It's unstoppable! Every play should be set up to deceive the defense into believing something other than a check down will occur, then the QB should just check down to an RB or TE. ;)
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Eli »

Perhaps, but he's been pretty average as a receiving back so far, so I don't know what's to be gained when he's also running the ball 25 times a game. Peterson has incredible vision and cutting ability, but it's predicated on seeing the field in front of him. Nine times out of ten when he catches the ball, he has his back to the defense, and at the point when he catches the ball he looks like just another guy with shoulder pads and helmet and a football in his hands.
indianation65
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 545
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:52 am
x 3

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by indianation65 »

Yes, he could/should be used more as a receiver. Just about any football player who regularly holds/touches the football can surely catch a 3-5 yard lob from a qb, even if he is known for having mediocre hands. That's what practice and reps are all about. Even if AP is used to seeing the field based upon being squared up, most dump passes from the backfield will start with 2-5 yards of open space, especially if he blocks/fake blocks to the tight end side. The tight end will draw that defender down field 10 or so, or wherever he goes. Besides, AP could catch the lob in stride almost facing down the field or at least angled toward the sideline. If the D gets wind of it, the tight end pass is usually a money grabber. Therefore, yes, run and catch is always best! Heck, I wouldn't mind seeing Ponder/Cassel run opposite a play and wave some "I'm open," arms! It's always cool when a qb becomes a receiver, especially one with wheels!

...wisdom
...spirits in the wind and the trees
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1074

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by VikingLord »

Mothman wrote:
Yes.

I think Peterson has been under-utilized as a receiver over the course of his career and I'd like to see him used in that capacity more this season.
Proof positive that the checkdown works:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhwfUGWbieU
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Demi »

Yeah the coaches are just not giving him those opportunities because they work so well.

Has nothing to do with being a dreadful blocker, who on a number of occasions has had easy check downs bounce off his hands. :confused:
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Mothman »

:wallbang:
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Purple bruise »

Mothman wrote::wallbang:
Blame it on Ponder , that 6-2 230 lb. midget coudn't even throw a checkdown pass that far anyway. :rofl:
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by Demi »

Mothman wrote::wallbang:
What? He's probably the greatest, or top 3, runner of all time. He's pathetic as a blocker, many times letting his guy go through unblocked, and not a very good receiver.

My god, I know some people think he's a mixture Adonis, Jerry Rice, Hercules, Jim Brown. But he's not.

:wallbang: is right.
User avatar
MV711
Backup
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Stamford, CT

Re: Adrian Peterson

Post by MV711 »

Demi wrote: What? He's probably the greatest, or top 3, runner of all time. He's pathetic as a blocker, many times letting his guy go through unblocked, and not a very good receiver.

My god, I know some people think he's a mixture Adonis, Jerry Rice, Hercules, Jim Brown. But he's not.

:wallbang: is right.
He may not be the all-around back we all want him to be BUT if given more opportunities as a receiver, I believe he can improve his receiving skills. I agree his blocking skills suck.
Post Reply