Adrian Peterson
Moderator: Moderators
Adrian Peterson
Although I as well as countless Viking fans are thrilled with AD's rushing performance over his career, would the Vikings be wise to use him a little more as a receiver out of the backfield on screens, slants, etc. so as to utilize his speed and athleticism as well as to possibly increase this dimension to our offensive attack to our advantage?
Re: Adrian Peterson
MV711 wrote:Although I as well as countless Viking fans are thrilled with AD's rushing performance over his career, would the Vikings be wise to use him a little more as a receiver out of the backfield on screens, slants, etc. so as to utilize his speed and athleticism as well as to possibly increase this dimension to our offensive attack to our advantage?
Yes.
I think Peterson has been under-utilized as a receiver over the course of his career and I'd like to see him used in that capacity more this season.
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Adrian Peterson
I knew you'd be advocating for more check-downs, Jim.Mothman wrote:
Yes.
I think Peterson has been under-utilized as a receiver over the course of his career and I'd like to see him used in that capacity more this season.


“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
-
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Adrian Peterson
dead_poet wrote: I knew you'd be advocating for more check-downs, Jim.![]()
Jeez, Jim, what are you trying to do, run the Vikings into the ground??

The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
Re: Adrian Peterson
dead_poet wrote:I knew you'd be advocating for more check-downs, Jim.![]()

-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
- Location: Coon Rapids, MN
- x 117
Re: Adrian Peterson
Wasn't there a thread last season all about Jim called "Check Down Charlie". I think Jim is secretly Bald Clueless, err I mean Brad Childress and the reason he sucked so bad on the sidelines was because he was busy on his iPhone responding to all the threads on this forum instead of you know, actually coaching.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
Re: Adrian Peterson
The check down is the single greatest play in any NFL team's arsenal. It's unstoppable! Every play should be set up to deceive the defense into believing something other than a check down will occur, then the QB should just check down to an RB or TE.mansquatch wrote:Wasn't there a thread last season all about Jim called "Check Down Charlie". I think Jim is secretly Bald Clueless, err I mean Brad Childress and the reason he sucked so bad on the sidelines was because he was busy on his iPhone responding to all the threads on this forum instead of you know, actually coaching.

Re: Adrian Peterson
Perhaps, but he's been pretty average as a receiving back so far, so I don't know what's to be gained when he's also running the ball 25 times a game. Peterson has incredible vision and cutting ability, but it's predicated on seeing the field in front of him. Nine times out of ten when he catches the ball, he has his back to the defense, and at the point when he catches the ball he looks like just another guy with shoulder pads and helmet and a football in his hands.
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:52 am
- x 3
Re: Adrian Peterson
Yes, he could/should be used more as a receiver. Just about any football player who regularly holds/touches the football can surely catch a 3-5 yard lob from a qb, even if he is known for having mediocre hands. That's what practice and reps are all about. Even if AP is used to seeing the field based upon being squared up, most dump passes from the backfield will start with 2-5 yards of open space, especially if he blocks/fake blocks to the tight end side. The tight end will draw that defender down field 10 or so, or wherever he goes. Besides, AP could catch the lob in stride almost facing down the field or at least angled toward the sideline. If the D gets wind of it, the tight end pass is usually a money grabber. Therefore, yes, run and catch is always best! Heck, I wouldn't mind seeing Ponder/Cassel run opposite a play and wave some "I'm open," arms! It's always cool when a qb becomes a receiver, especially one with wheels!
...wisdom
...wisdom
...spirits in the wind and the trees
- VikingLord
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8634
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
- Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
- x 1074
Re: Adrian Peterson
Proof positive that the checkdown works:Mothman wrote:
Yes.
I think Peterson has been under-utilized as a receiver over the course of his career and I'd like to see him used in that capacity more this season.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhwfUGWbieU
Re: Adrian Peterson
Yeah the coaches are just not giving him those opportunities because they work so well.
Has nothing to do with being a dreadful blocker, who on a number of occasions has had easy check downs bounce off his hands.
Has nothing to do with being a dreadful blocker, who on a number of occasions has had easy check downs bounce off his hands.

-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Adrian Peterson
Blame it on Ponder , that 6-2 230 lb. midget coudn't even throw a checkdown pass that far anyway.Mothman wrote:

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: Adrian Peterson
What? He's probably the greatest, or top 3, runner of all time. He's pathetic as a blocker, many times letting his guy go through unblocked, and not a very good receiver.Mothman wrote:
My god, I know some people think he's a mixture Adonis, Jerry Rice, Hercules, Jim Brown. But he's not.

Re: Adrian Peterson
He may not be the all-around back we all want him to be BUT if given more opportunities as a receiver, I believe he can improve his receiving skills. I agree his blocking skills suck.Demi wrote: What? He's probably the greatest, or top 3, runner of all time. He's pathetic as a blocker, many times letting his guy go through unblocked, and not a very good receiver.
My god, I know some people think he's a mixture Adonis, Jerry Rice, Hercules, Jim Brown. But he's not.
is right.