We cant afford Tretter. Suh would come 3-4 million I think.J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 7:51 amThis is where I stand. We've got fairly deep group of D-linemen who aren't 35 and expensive (recognizing that Tretter is 31). OTOH, our center is holding our offense back.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 6:42 am As for Suh, I wouldnt be opposed to this signing simply because interior pass rush does worry me. Both Phillips and Tomlinson arent known pass rushers. Watts can do some damage but Suh is definitely tempting. But if I had to choose one FA to spend money on, it would be JC Tretter over Suh.
It's not that I think Suh is garbage. It's that I believe the scarce resources could be better spent.
Vikings Serious About Suh
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 10:22 pm
- x 74
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9824
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
- x 1885
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
The Vikings have $10.9 million in cap space with only 2 rookies still to sign. They can afford Tretter.JJBreaksRecords wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 7:02 amWe cant afford Tretter. Suh would come 3-4 million I think.J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 7:51 am
This is where I stand. We've got fairly deep group of D-linemen who aren't 35 and expensive (recognizing that Tretter is 31). OTOH, our center is holding our offense back.
It's not that I think Suh is garbage. It's that I believe the scarce resources could be better spent.
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
- Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
- x 1053
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Is the interior DL really where the Vikings need to improve at this point? It would be one thing if it were an obvious weakness, but assuming they remain healthy there I don't think it's an area that warrants further spending.
As to the specific player, Suh overall is at the tail end of his career anyway. Beyond his name recognition, I don't think he would bring much to the Vikings even if he came cheap.
If the Vikings still have dollars to spend, they should focus those on weak spots like center if there are any players who would be upgrades.
As to the specific player, Suh overall is at the tail end of his career anyway. Beyond his name recognition, I don't think he would bring much to the Vikings even if he came cheap.
If the Vikings still have dollars to spend, they should focus those on weak spots like center if there are any players who would be upgrades.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3857
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm
- x 797
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Many talk about having dollars and it will solve problems. People need to realize teams don't give their top players the boot and that's why there is always a very limited amount of top level talent in FA. And if there are a few top level players you will need to overpay about 30% or higher to get them. I wish the Rams will cut CB Ramsey who is as close to shut down as you can get. He won't be cut until he is washed up. We already have that with PP. Suh is washed up and at most is a spot player. A true shut down corner and a cornerstone center/guard are more important right now.VikingLord wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:42 pm Is the interior DL really where the Vikings need to improve at this point? It would be one thing if it were an obvious weakness, but assuming they remain healthy there I don't think it's an area that warrants further spending.
As to the specific player, Suh overall is at the tail end of his career anyway. Beyond his name recognition, I don't think he would bring much to the Vikings even if he came cheap.
If the Vikings still have dollars to spend, they should focus those on weak spots like center if there are any players who would be upgrades.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3674
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
- x 641
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Weird you bring up Ramsey since he was a guy who switched teams. It took a trade, but he was traded in large part because the Jags didn't think they could keep him.CharVike wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:08 amMany talk about having dollars and it will solve problems. People need to realize teams don't give their top players the boot and that's why there is always a very limited amount of top level talent in FA. And if there are a few top level players you will need to overpay about 30% or higher to get them. I wish the Rams will cut CB Ramsey who is as close to shut down as you can get. He won't be cut until he is washed up. We already have that with PP. Suh is washed up and at most is a spot player. A true shut down corner and a cornerstone center/guard are more important right now.VikingLord wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:42 pm Is the interior DL really where the Vikings need to improve at this point? It would be one thing if it were an obvious weakness, but assuming they remain healthy there I don't think it's an area that warrants further spending.
As to the specific player, Suh overall is at the tail end of his career anyway. Beyond his name recognition, I don't think he would bring much to the Vikings even if he came cheap.
If the Vikings still have dollars to spend, they should focus those on weak spots like center if there are any players who would be upgrades.
With an extra 35 million in cap this season the Vikings could have signed - 2022 cap hits:
JC Jackson - 8 million
James Daniels - 4.1 million
Brandon Scherff - 8 million
DJ Reed - 4.6 Million
Akiem Hicks - 8 million
If the roadblock with signing Tretter is truly money and not something else, they could add him and not Daniels since Cleveland is probably good enough at guard and not much of a downgrade from Daniels.
An expensive way to build a team and the Vikings wouldn't be able to add anything next season, but having extra cap space can make the team better.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:36 am
- x 55
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Brucifer Allen. Logic, decency and rationality cannot be applied. Looking at anything Washington did during his reign and what the rest of the league would do is not apples to apples. Its apples to dead baby bunnies.StumpHunter wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 8:45 amWhat are you talking about, Washington offered Cousins a 3 year deal.
The first franchise tag was a non-exclusive tag, meaning any team could have given up a couple of 1st for Cousins and gotten him if Washington didn't match their contract offer. They then gave Alex Smith more money than they offered Cousins, which just shows you how they really felt about the QB.Then they signed him twice to one year deals. If he sucked they wouldn't have offered those high one year franchise deals. Just tell him to get lost.
What does that have to do with anything?Tom Brady had this once four years and $72M were for the 2011 through 2014 seasons and it had a record amount of guaranteed money and was the biggest contract in NFL history. Only 4 years. That's not long term. Now he's on a 2 year deal and is playing as well as he ever did and shows no sign of slowing up. He could play another decade or maybe 2 more.
Cousins, at the peak of his value when he hit free agency wanted a fully guaranteed deal over 3 years. Did something change where he no longer wants a 3 year, fully guaranteed deal, or has his value declined to the point he can no longer ask for that? The Packers are all in on their QB and gave him 150 million fully guaranteed. The Vikings gave their QB 35 million. Which team actually believes in their QB and which team settled, afraid to bottom out?
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4280
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 762
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Looks like we weren't that serious about Suh or we would have signed him by now.
-
- Transition Player
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:06 am
- x 59
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Suh is visiting the Raiders too so Suh is deciding what team to sign with so that is why Vikings have not signed him yetVikingsVictorious wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 7:12 am Looks like we weren't that serious about Suh or we would have signed him by now.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4280
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 762
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
True, but it shouldn't take three weeks to figure this stuff out.VikingsFan84 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 06, 2022 7:39 pmSuh is visiting the Raiders too so Suh is deciding what team to sign with so that is why Vikings have not signed him yetVikingsVictorious wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 7:12 am Looks like we weren't that serious about Suh or we would have signed him by now.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:38 am
- x 411
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Suh would be a good guy to add to the rotation or start. He still has rare strength and brings attitude to a defense. He doesn't commit the dumb penalties as much as he used to and is always healthy.
mael·strom
a powerful whirlpool in the sea or a river.
a situation or state of confused movement or violent turmoil.
a powerful whirlpool in the sea or a river.
a situation or state of confused movement or violent turmoil.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4280
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 762
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Latest on Suh being considered by Vikings and vice versa.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3674
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
- x 641
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
Vikings waived Nate Stanley opening up a roster spot.
Suh signing on the horizon?
Suh signing on the horizon?
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4280
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 762
Re: Vikings Serious About Suh
I thought it would be safe to read your post in this thread so I opened it. Glad to hear we got rid of Stanley Steamer.StumpHunter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 12:44 pm Vikings waived Nate Stanley opening up a roster spot.
Suh signing on the horizon?