Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:49 pm
His leash should be watching Cassel start the third.
But he'll be given at least until the bye week.
But he'll be given at least until the bye week.
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://vikingsmessageboard.com/
LA Viking wrote:This is actually unfortunate. Ponder should be given this full season to show us whether or not he is our man. We are not winning the Super Bowl this year, we just have too many weaknesses (LB, S, QB, OL), but if the game can finally slow down for Ponder (which unfortunately, I don't think will happen, I think he will end up in mediocrity - just good enough to start, but bad enough that you are wishing for a new starter), then we have one less hole to fill and if we could address LB and S next year, we have a team (assuming the OL gets back on track).
PurpleMustReign wrote:I love Josh Freeman. I would be extatic if the Vikings would pick him up but I don't see it happenign.
LOL, doesn't mean he does either, does it? Did he suck when he played for NE? Or his last preseason game here? How many snaps have you seen him take with our starting O. In your mind, are we stuck with Ponder forever? Because anyone else sucks?80 PurplePride 84 wrote:Just because Ponder sucks doesn't mean Cassel doesn't.
Benching Ponder now sends a clear message that the Vikings are going to move on. Do you do that, risk alienating anyone in the locker room who supports Ponder, possibly getting a worse result, and tip your hand for the draft already? Or, do you stick with Ponder, do what you can to improve his play and keep competitive, and risk alienating anyone in the locker room who is tired of Ponder at QB? It's a heck of a balancing act, but winning does make a nice balm. But who is the winner?PurpleKoolaid wrote: LOL, doesn't mean he does either, does it? Did he suck when he played for NE? Or his last preseason game here? How many snaps have you seen him take with our starting O. In your mind, are we stuck with Ponder forever? Because anyone else sucks?
I haven't given up on the season, but I have on Ponder. The good he shows is overshadowed by the bad. The pick 6 was the game. He still stares down receivers like he did his rookie year. He doesn't wait for his read progressions like other good QBs. He did actually make an audible today, but should we bite the bullet and let him play more for that? Because I think we are just waiting for bad Ponder 2 games in a row. Which, at this point, would ruin this season. After that I don't care what they do with him. They have shown me at least, they have no idea how to pick a QB, in a draft or FA.BGM wrote: Benching Ponder now sends a clear message that the Vikings are going to move on. Do you do that, risk alienating anyone in the locker room who supports Ponder, possibly getting a worse result, and tip your hand for the draft already? Or, do you stick with Ponder, do what you can to improve his play and keep competitive, and risk alienating anyone in the locker room who is tired of Ponder at QB? It's a heck of a balancing act, but winning does make a nice balm. But who is the winner?
I know you have given up on him, as have many here. I see very little good that can come of keeping him starting. However, if I am the head coach, my job is to give the team the best opportunity to win. So, does benching Ponder do that? That's a very tough question to answer with any certainty. Do you stay with the devil you know or the one you have yet to face and hope he becomes a savior instead? Personally, I do think the Ponder era should end here.PurpleKoolaid wrote: I haven't given up on the season, but I have on Ponder. The good he shows is overshadowed by the bad. The pick 6 was the game. He still stares down receivers like he did his rookie year. He doesn't wait for his read progressions like other good QBs. He did actually make an audible today, but should we bite the bullet and let him play more for that? Because I think we are just waiting for bad Ponder 2 games in a row. Which, at this point, would ruin this season. After that I don't care what they do with him. They have shown me at least, they have no idea how to pick a QB, in a draft or FA.
Great, if the Vikings are playing the SEC. Wait, not sure they could win in that league.....Laserman wrote:Let Ponder finish out the season and sink us so we draft 1,2, or 3 and Draft the Alabama QB. All he does is win national championships.
The Vikings lost by 1 point in a game where they gave up 246 kickoff&punt return yards to Devin Hester. This is not a team that is going to win less than 7 games. They could have won today, probably should have won today. That they didn't does not make them the disaster some on this board are proclaiming them to be. They are likely a good, not great team. Unfortunately, all bets are off if AD is injured and cannot play at 100%. However, if AD can indeed play, it should be remembered that he has more rushing yards in weeks 1 and 2 this year than he had in his 2000+ yard season last year if I am not mistaken. That will overcome a lot of inconsistent QB play, like last year, especially if they utilize C. Patterson in the Percy Harvin role to a greater extent than they've done so far.Raptorman wrote: Great, if the Vikings are playing the SEC. Wait, not sure they could win in that league.....
Thats how I see it. I wanna see Ponder play like he did in the second half for the next few games though and for the D to not take me through so many roller coaster rides.CalVike wrote: The Vikings lost by 1 point in a game where they gave up 246 kickoff&punt return yards to Devin Hester. This is not a team that is going to win less than 7 games. They could have won today, probably should have won today. That they didn't does not make them the disaster some on this board are proclaiming them to be. They are likely a good, not great team. Unfortunately, all bets are off if AD is injured and cannot play at 100%. However, if AD can indeed play, it should be remembered that he has more rushing yards in weeks 1 and 2 this year than he had in his 2000+ yard season last year if I am not mistaken. That will overcome a lot of inconsistent QB play, like last year, especially if they utilize C. Patterson in the Percy Harvin role to a greater extent than they've done so far.