Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
Moderator: Moderators
-
Hunter Morrow
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5692
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
- x 16
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
His leash should be watching Cassel start the third.
But he'll be given at least until the bye week.
But he'll be given at least until the bye week.
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
This is actually unfortunate. Ponder should be given this full season to show us whether or not he is our man. We are not winning the Super Bowl this year, we just have too many weaknesses (LB, S, QB, OL), but if the game can finally slow down for Ponder (which unfortunately, I don't think will happen, I think he will end up in mediocrity - just good enough to start, but bad enough that you are wishing for a new starter), then we have one less hole to fill and if we could address LB and S next year, we have a team (assuming the OL gets back on track).
The difference between men is not lack of strength, not lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of will.
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
LA Viking wrote:This is actually unfortunate. Ponder should be given this full season to show us whether or not he is our man. We are not winning the Super Bowl this year, we just have too many weaknesses (LB, S, QB, OL), but if the game can finally slow down for Ponder (which unfortunately, I don't think will happen, I think he will end up in mediocrity - just good enough to start, but bad enough that you are wishing for a new starter), then we have one less hole to fill and if we could address LB and S next year, we have a team (assuming the OL gets back on track).
Super Bowls can be won with average, competent QB's. Super Bowls CANNOT be won with bad QB's. "They" say that 32-35 games started by a QB should tell you everything. Ponder is close to that. He hasn't shown any real improvement. Time to move on.
Though, I feel Ponder should be given a home game before he gets the axe. It's a tough situation when you're juggling with a #### OC and a #### QB. Who do you blame first?
-
HornedMessiah
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3382
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:32 pm
- Location: nodakoda
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
If Ponder is really hanging on by a thread then maybe they should call Tampa Bay and see if those rumors about Freeman being on the outs have any truth to them. I saw an article earlier today that Freeman plans to ask for a trade before the October deadline. Maybe they would be interested in a one-for-one swap? Cassel could start for a couple weeks until Freeman acquaints himself with the offense.
I still don't think Ponder is in any immediate danger of losing his job. That article makes it seem like it's Frazier's decision whether or not to bench Ponder and go with Cassel, but I'm not sure that's the case.
I still don't think Ponder is in any immediate danger of losing his job. That article makes it seem like it's Frazier's decision whether or not to bench Ponder and go with Cassel, but I'm not sure that's the case.
-
PurpleMustReign
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
I love Josh Freeman. I would be extatic if the Vikings would pick him up but I don't see it happenign.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
-
Purple bruise
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
PurpleMustReign wrote:I love Josh Freeman. I would be extatic if the Vikings would pick him up but I don't see it happenign.
Really, what has Freeman done? He threw for 125 yards today in a loss and 210 yards the week before.
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
LOL, doesn't mean he does either, does it? Did he suck when he played for NE? Or his last preseason game here? How many snaps have you seen him take with our starting O. In your mind, are we stuck with Ponder forever? Because anyone else sucks?80 PurplePride 84 wrote:Just because Ponder sucks doesn't mean Cassel doesn't.
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
Benching Ponder now sends a clear message that the Vikings are going to move on. Do you do that, risk alienating anyone in the locker room who supports Ponder, possibly getting a worse result, and tip your hand for the draft already? Or, do you stick with Ponder, do what you can to improve his play and keep competitive, and risk alienating anyone in the locker room who is tired of Ponder at QB? It's a heck of a balancing act, but winning does make a nice balm. But who is the winner?PurpleKoolaid wrote: LOL, doesn't mean he does either, does it? Did he suck when he played for NE? Or his last preseason game here? How many snaps have you seen him take with our starting O. In your mind, are we stuck with Ponder forever? Because anyone else sucks?
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - Frank Zappa
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
I haven't given up on the season, but I have on Ponder. The good he shows is overshadowed by the bad. The pick 6 was the game. He still stares down receivers like he did his rookie year. He doesn't wait for his read progressions like other good QBs. He did actually make an audible today, but should we bite the bullet and let him play more for that? Because I think we are just waiting for bad Ponder 2 games in a row. Which, at this point, would ruin this season. After that I don't care what they do with him. They have shown me at least, they have no idea how to pick a QB, in a draft or FA.BGM wrote: Benching Ponder now sends a clear message that the Vikings are going to move on. Do you do that, risk alienating anyone in the locker room who supports Ponder, possibly getting a worse result, and tip your hand for the draft already? Or, do you stick with Ponder, do what you can to improve his play and keep competitive, and risk alienating anyone in the locker room who is tired of Ponder at QB? It's a heck of a balancing act, but winning does make a nice balm. But who is the winner?
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
I know you have given up on him, as have many here. I see very little good that can come of keeping him starting. However, if I am the head coach, my job is to give the team the best opportunity to win. So, does benching Ponder do that? That's a very tough question to answer with any certainty. Do you stay with the devil you know or the one you have yet to face and hope he becomes a savior instead? Personally, I do think the Ponder era should end here.PurpleKoolaid wrote: I haven't given up on the season, but I have on Ponder. The good he shows is overshadowed by the bad. The pick 6 was the game. He still stares down receivers like he did his rookie year. He doesn't wait for his read progressions like other good QBs. He did actually make an audible today, but should we bite the bullet and let him play more for that? Because I think we are just waiting for bad Ponder 2 games in a row. Which, at this point, would ruin this season. After that I don't care what they do with him. They have shown me at least, they have no idea how to pick a QB, in a draft or FA.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." - Frank Zappa
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
I really think that we need to give him the full season, but if I were Frazier, I would probably be very close to putting in Cassel. Though, I haven't seen much from Cassel (in his limited preseason appearances) that would make me think that he is the better option, but the coaches have a much better feel for the QB edge.
It is kind of ironic/sad/funny that Ponder's backup at FSU is looking to be a pretty solid QB right off the bat.
It is kind of ironic/sad/funny that Ponder's backup at FSU is looking to be a pretty solid QB right off the bat.
The difference between men is not lack of strength, not lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of will.
- Laserman
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
- Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
- x 14
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
Let Ponder finish out the season and sink us so we draft 1,2, or 3 and Draft the Alabama QB. All he does is win national championships.
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
Great, if the Vikings are playing the SEC. Wait, not sure they could win in that league.....Laserman wrote:Let Ponder finish out the season and sink us so we draft 1,2, or 3 and Draft the Alabama QB. All he does is win national championships.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
The Vikings lost by 1 point in a game where they gave up 246 kickoff&punt return yards to Devin Hester. This is not a team that is going to win less than 7 games. They could have won today, probably should have won today. That they didn't does not make them the disaster some on this board are proclaiming them to be. They are likely a good, not great team. Unfortunately, all bets are off if AD is injured and cannot play at 100%. However, if AD can indeed play, it should be remembered that he has more rushing yards in weeks 1 and 2 this year than he had in his 2000+ yard season last year if I am not mistaken. That will overcome a lot of inconsistent QB play, like last year, especially if they utilize C. Patterson in the Percy Harvin role to a greater extent than they've done so far.Raptorman wrote: Great, if the Vikings are playing the SEC. Wait, not sure they could win in that league.....
Re: Glazer: Ponder on shorter leash than believed
Thats how I see it. I wanna see Ponder play like he did in the second half for the next few games though and for the D to not take me through so many roller coaster rides.CalVike wrote: The Vikings lost by 1 point in a game where they gave up 246 kickoff&punt return yards to Devin Hester. This is not a team that is going to win less than 7 games. They could have won today, probably should have won today. That they didn't does not make them the disaster some on this board are proclaiming them to be. They are likely a good, not great team. Unfortunately, all bets are off if AD is injured and cannot play at 100%. However, if AD can indeed play, it should be remembered that he has more rushing yards in weeks 1 and 2 this year than he had in his 2000+ yard season last year if I am not mistaken. That will overcome a lot of inconsistent QB play, like last year, especially if they utilize C. Patterson in the Percy Harvin role to a greater extent than they've done so far.