Burton VRS Webb

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Who you would like to see make the team more, Burton or Webb?

Stephen Burton
7
16%
Joe Webb
37
84%
 
Total votes: 44

User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Burton VRS Webb

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

I thought there used to be a poll option as a thread? Oh well.

Im interested in who you would like to see make the team more, Burton or Webb. Burton, having the spot handed to him a few years in a row and doing nothing with it. Or Webb, who, to me, is exactly what we need on the outside, a big Megatron type WR. Webbs first year, and to me, he should already have the job. He is more athletic, a better blocker, faster, better hands, and a better route runner (and doesn't stop mid route to make Ponder look even worse). Yet I read people talking about Burton having the job already. Whats your opinion? As much as I disliked Webb at QB, I like him at WR, and he is a rookie.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by Demi »

Ponder is in his fifth year. And Webb is a rookie.

:rock:

Not sure why our 5th WR is that big of a deal. They were talking about it on KFAN earlier. Neither of these guys is likely to make that big of a difference. Webb has potential I guess, but apparently so does Burton?

I'll say Webb, and use him as the emergency QB, use MBTs roster spot for someone else. At least it gives you an opening. Maybe keep Webb and Burton if you were considering three QB? Rather have more depth and future potential at WR than a journeyman #3 QB who will never see the field.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

Demi wrote:Ponder is in his fifth year. And Webb is a rookie.

:rock:

Not sure why our 5th WR is that big of a deal. They were talking about it on KFAN earlier. Neither of these guys is likely to make that big of a difference. Webb has potential I guess, but apparently so does Burton?

I'll say Webb, and use him as the emergency QB, use MBTs roster spot for someone else. At least it gives you an opening. Maybe keep Webb and Burton if you were considering three QB? Rather have more depth and future potential at WR than a journeyman #3 QB who will never see the field.
Cause we don't have any big WRs? And he is in his rookie year as w WR if I have t spell that out for ya. And any improvement to the WRs is a big deal. The powers that be have forgotten them almost as much as the rotten QB's we have.
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by PurpleMustReign »

Demi wrote:I'll say Webb, and use him as the emergency QB, use MBTs roster spot for someone else. At least it gives you an opening. Maybe keep Webb and Burton if you were considering three QB? Rather have more depth and future potential at WR than a journeyman #3 QB who will never see the field.

I agree with this, an hope this is the way they go. Webb showed he can get up and catch the high ball, something that I dont' think Burton can do.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by Demi »

PurpleKoolaid wrote: Cause we don't have any big WRs? And he is in his rookie year as w WR if I have t spell that out for ya. And any improvement to the WRs is a big deal. The powers that be have forgotten them almost as much as the rotten QB's we have.
It was only a couple years ago they were giving him some offseason work at WR. He played WR a year in college. He knows the offense and the plays. He isn't a guy who they just moved to WR out of the blue without any work there before....
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by Demi »

Still not sure what the big deal is with Burton, but the team must like him. He an amazing practice player or something?
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by DK Sweets »

I feel like both deserve a roster spot, and MBT will be shuffled to the practice squad. If you're down to your third QB, you're screwed anyways. Might as well do some pistol/option type plays (possibly even Wildcat) with Peterson and Joe Webb. I doubt that's what they would do, but that's what I think is best...

But if I can only keep one, I think it would be Webb.
headless_norseman
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1878
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:35 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by headless_norseman »

No contest. Webb. Drop both players and see how fast they get picked up. Webb gets picked up faster than Burton, easy. We've seen enough of Burton for several years now - why bother?
A successful coach needs a patient wife, loyal dog, and great quarterback - and not necessarily in that order.

-- Bud Grant
The Breeze
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: So. Utah

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by The Breeze »

I'm with the consensus. If I had to choose it'd be Webb. I see why they like Burton....he almost pulled down that bad pass from Ponder with one hand, he blocks well, and he seems to get open...he has skills. But the knock has been consistency and I can't really comment on that about him.

My gut says that if they only keep two QBs they won't keep an extra WR, it'll be a DB or LB.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by DK Sweets »

The Breeze wrote:I'm with the consensus. If I had to choose it'd be Webb. I see why they like Burton....he almost pulled down that bad pass from Ponder with one hand, he blocks well, and he seems to get open...he has skills. But the knock has been consistency and I can't really comment on that about him.

My gut says that if they only keep two QBs they won't keep an extra WR, it'll be a DB or LB.
The reason a lot of us have mentioned two QBs is the idea that Joe Webb can focus on being a wide receiver, but if we needed our emergency #3 QB he still knows the offense well enough to plug the hole. Essentially using one guy to fill both roster spots.
User avatar
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Sebastian, FL
x 67

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by Raptorman »

PurpleKoolaid wrote:I thought there used to be a poll option as a thread? Oh well.

Im interested in who you would like to see make the team more, Burton or Webb. Burton, having the spot handed to him a few years in a row and doing nothing with it. Or Webb, who, to me, is exactly what we need on the outside, a big Megatron type WR. Webbs first year, and to me, he should already have the job. He is more athletic, a better blocker, faster, better hands, and a better route runner (and doesn't stop mid route to make Ponder look even worse). Yet I read people talking about Burton having the job already. Whats your opinion? As much as I disliked Webb at QB, I like him at WR, and he is a rookie.
Poll option is at the bottom. You can still do it. Just go in and edit.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
S197
Fenrir
Posts: 12790
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 662

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by S197 »

Added the poll for him.
PurpleHalo
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1915
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:28 am
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by PurpleHalo »

DKSweets wrote:The reason a lot of us have mentioned two QBs is the idea that Joe Webb can focus on being a wide receiver, but if we needed our emergency #3 QB he still knows the offense well enough to plug the hole. Essentially using one guy to fill both roster spots.
But you aren't developing MBT that way. If Webb is going to play WR he should be all in with that, and not halfway in 2 positions. I know decades ago before my time, they had Bob Lee as a punter and backup QB, but punter is a much easier position than WR.
This space available for rent.
The Breeze
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: So. Utah

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by The Breeze »

DKSweets wrote:The reason a lot of us have mentioned two QBs is the idea that Joe Webb can focus on being a wide receiver, but if we needed our emergency #3 QB he still knows the offense well enough to plug the hole. Essentially using one guy to fill both roster spots.
Yeah, I get the part about the 2 QB thing and Webb. It was originally tossed out there as a way to keep both Burton and Webb.

I meant that if they only keep 2QBs it doesn't mean they will keep Burton as a 6th WR. They could...but having an extra guy on the defense would probably be wiser......
User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9603
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
x 24

Re: Burton VRS Webb

Post by soflavike »

Webb: 6'4" - 220 lbs. with a 42.5 vertical, decent speed and great agility and strength, and he's shown good hands in pre-season... plus he can be an emergency QB and a good option on a WR reverse with a pass option type of gadget play. Not even a close decision on this one.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
Post Reply