Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8322
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 990

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by VikingLord »

Mothman wrote:Bridgewater does too. Since he's the one who takes the hits when they break down on a passing play, he should understand them as well as anybody. Even if his coaches let him down with a bad play call, a sack or turnover in that situation ends the game and he was the person most responsible for making sure that didn't happen. He had the ball so he was the only one in control of the situation and he needed to throw it away. Don't step up and double clutch, just get rid of it.
Agree with this too, but only to the degree that once the ball is snapped it's up to Bridgewater to then manage the play and the outcome.

In my view, the only play that should have been called was something quick and outside, like a bubble screen. Basically a play where the QB gets the ball, drops, and fires towards the sideline.

Given how aggressive the Cardinals were playing, it just seems like the better option was to not risk it and just kick the field goal on 3rd down.

Freeney deserves credit, sure. Kalil deserves some blame, sure. But I agree with you that Bridgewater bears the burden of post-snap knowing what he needs to do and when he needs to do it by.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by Mothman »

I think 13 seconds was enough time to run one more play in that situation but the whole things rests on the QB making a good decision. The time only becomes a serious issue if the decision is bad.

The QB should be able to get the ball out of his hands in 2-2.5 seconds (at most) after the snap and the route needs to be designed to allow that to happen.

If the receiver isn't in position to make the catch and get out of bounds, the QB needs to throw the ball away. If the receiver is open near the sidelines but covered well enough that he might not get out, throw it away. If there's no receiver open, throw it away. Basically, if there's any situation other than an easy throw, catch and step out of bounds, throw it away.

You obviously need to have a well-designed play in that situation but the main danger is a poor choice by the QB.

The Vikes blew it. :(
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by mosscarter »

i think the final play was systematic of what we've seen from bridgewater all year mothman. he's been double pumping way more this year than last year and he's been hesitant. when time is a factor you have to know where you are going to go with the football. if that play isn't there throw it away. he dropped back and had no idea where he was going to go, he pumped and looked around and then out came the ball. it seems like teddy is only good at getting us close; but nothing beyond that. as noted, his touchdown statistics are horrible and i don't think mike wallace is the problem. teddy has to be in close range to even have a chance at throwing a td and that isn't a good sign. so many other teams play to win and i didn't feel we played to win on that last drive at all. they put all their eggs in one basket with walsh; who at times has been inconsistent. why don't we take shots to the end zone? the way i see it it can only be one of two things: they don't have confidence in bridgewater, or bridgewater simply cannot make those downfield throws period whether they call the play or not. he hasn't shown me anything whatsoever of a vertical passing element. he looked more poised in the pocket last night, but so many of those throws were short and there were a ton of yac. until, or if he learns to throw deeper passes we'll never beat the tougher teams. the alarming part of this season is against denver, green bay, seattle, and the cardinals were all loses. if we can't beat the good teams what is the point? i said it before that late last year and the first half of this year our schedule was so easy.
TeddyBaller
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by TeddyBaller »

Mothman wrote: I don't know but once it was called, it was going to be run. At that point, the coaches had made their blunder. TB needed to preserve the opportunity to kick the field goal.

Matt Ryan would be perfect for the Vikings

i want teddy in the ATL
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 151

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by 808vikingsfan »

Mothman wrote:I think 13 seconds was enough time to run one more play in that situation but the whole things rests on the QB making a good decision. The time only becomes a serious issue if the decision is bad.

The QB should be able to get the ball out of his hands in 2-2.5 seconds (at most) after the snap and the route needs to be designed to allow that to happen.

If the receiver isn't in position to make the catch and get out of bounds, the QB needs to throw the ball away. If the receiver is open near the sidelines but covered well enough that he might not get out, throw it away. If there's no receiver open, throw it away. Basically, if there's any situation other than an easy throw, catch and step out of bounds, throw it away.

You obviously need to have a well-designed play in that situation but the main danger is a poor choice by the QB.

The Vikes blew it. :(
I think you meant to say, "Bridgewater blew it." :)


I had an emergency call for work last night so I wasn't able to give my full attention to the 2nd half of the game. But I think I have to agree with Jim on this one. Bridgewater has to know the situation. The image that TSonn posted, 3 of the receivers are in the middle of the field. I think the smart decision at that point is to abort the play and kick the FG. I'd like to say that you have to trust your teammates to do their job. I'd like to say that you follow the designed play no matter what. But I think in this instance, you chuck the ball OOB.
Last edited by 808vikingsfan on Fri Dec 11, 2015 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
S197
Fenrir
Posts: 12790
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 662

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by S197 »

Zimmer's head:
"41 yards... I bet the kid will Walsh it to the right from here. Better get it a little closer."

"Alright #5, quick sideline routes, this line has been Norving their blocks all night long so get it out quick."

"Stop patting the god #### ball and throw it!"

"Son of a #### stupid #### mother ##### ##### sheep #### suck #### #### !!!!"
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by mosscarter »

you guys are missing the entire point i've been saying for weeks. bridgewater doesn't know what to do, how much more obvious does it need to be? we have qb problem. i've been saying it longer than anyone on this board aside from mothman.
sneaxsneax
Veteran
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 6:05 pm

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by sneaxsneax »

mosscarter wrote:you guys are missing the entire point i've been saying for weeks. bridgewater doesn't know what to do, how much more obvious does it need to be? we have qb problem. i've been saying it longer than anyone on this board aside from mothman.
Doesn't know what to do? Dude what are you talking about. You think you have been vindicated by that play? You think a game where he played very well and then got strip sacked in under 3 seconds on a play that shouldn't have been called and that ended in a #### up that was largely dude to a complete wiff by out LT? Holy #### dude, I see you in another thread thinking a 90 year old immobile manning is a good idea for this team. If my palm hit my face any harder it would come out the back of my head.
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by mosscarter »

same exact result in the denver game. explain that to me. please, i'm serious enlighten me. bridgewater is a weak armed over hyped qb and he has done nothing to prove that wrong. his statistics as a starter are among the top 5 worst in the entire nfl. he does not have it get used to it. what games have you been watching? every single pass of his is either a dump, screen, or 5 yd out pattern he is pathetic as an nfl qb. he cannot throw down the field its obvious.
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 151

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by 808vikingsfan »

808vikingsfan wrote: I think you meant to say, "Bridgewater blew it." :)




I had an emergency call for work last night so I wasn't able to give my full attention to the 2nd half of the game. But I think I have to agree with Jim on this one. Bridgewater has to know the situation. The image that TSonn posted, 3 of the receivers are in the middle of the field. I think the smart decision at that point is to abort the play and kick the FG. I'd like to say that you have to trust your teammates to do their job. I'd like to say that you follow the designed play no matter what. But I think in this instance, you chuck the ball OOB.
On the same note, if you're getting tackled on a reverse, you don't try and force the handoff.
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
Dmizzle0
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:03 pm
x 51

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by Dmizzle0 »

Teddy and the Defense did what they could do to keep us in the game. Initially I was mad only at Teddy for that play. I mean he could have had a got rid of the ball quicker but I think its on whoever mad that play call. This loss hurts only because I keep wondering if we could've pulled though in OT.
The Breeze
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: So. Utah

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by The Breeze »

808vikingsfan wrote:On the same note, if you're getting tackled on a reverse, you don't try and force the handoff.
OMG...that was a horrible decision.

He was looking right at the defender bear down on him as tried to convert that exchange.
sneaxsneax
Veteran
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 6:05 pm

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by sneaxsneax »

mosscarter wrote:same exact result in the denver game. explain that to me. please, i'm serious enlighten me. bridgewater is a weak armed over hyped qb and he has done nothing to prove that wrong. his statistics as a starter are among the top 5 worst in the entire nfl. he does not have it get used to it. what games have you been watching? every single pass of his is either a dump, screen, or 5 yd out pattern he is pathetic as an nfl qb. he cannot throw down the field its obvious.
Because we have protection that holds up for a few seconds, the majority of his passes are going to be plays that develop in time for that. It is actually really positive that he can go through his reads understand the coverage and then throw to his check down whilst evading pressure on nearly half of his snaps. Maybe he should stare down his 1st read and force a throw and throw a pick six.

No one calls tom brady bad, and most of his throws this season have been little dink and dunk passes to lewis and Edelman. I have seen teddy make the intermediate throws, and given the time to do so he can and does make them. The deep ball has been a bit of an issue but I think the chemistry is just lacking with Wallace, if he's back next year teddy and him really need to work on it.
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by Purple bruise »

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
User avatar
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Sebastian, FL
x 67

Re: Vikings-Cardinals final play thoughts

Post by Raptorman »

mosscarter wrote:same exact result in the denver game. explain that to me. please, i'm serious enlighten me. bridgewater is a weak armed over hyped qb and he has done nothing to prove that wrong. his statistics as a starter are among the top 5 worst in the entire nfl. he does not have it get used to it. what games have you been watching? every single pass of his is either a dump, screen, or 5 yd out pattern he is pathetic as an nfl qb. he cannot throw down the field its obvious.
Let's play myth vs reality. The myth is that Bridgewater is a dink and dunk QB unlike other QB's in the NFL. The reality is something different. So here goes. Bridgewater's passes compared to some other "REAL" NFL QB's. This is pass attempts into known area of the field. Data comes from ESPN. As people can see, Teddy has about the same number of attempts behind the LOS to the 10 yards past the LOS as other "real" NFL QB's. Now, I have done this before and will do it for any QB you want. But I can tell you the results are going to be about the same. His completion percentage past 31 yards is down below what many other do. Carr looks like a downfield freak at this point. BTW, Rodgers, Brees, and Rivers all had a higher percentage of attempts behind the LOS than Bridgewater. This is the reality of NFL QB's.

Edit: I add Culpepper and Favre on the bottom and addded percentage of TD's from 31+ as well as corrected the 31-40 should have read 31+. Total number of TD's thrown by these QB's that are in he 31+ range. 17. Wilson has the most at 4.

Code: Select all

             BLOS-10yards   11-30 yards     31+  yards   % comp 31+      % of TDs from 31+
Brady           73.6          23.5            2.9              23                  0.0
Rivers          71.5          25.1            3.4              27                  9.1
Bridgewater     69.9          26.6            3.5              17                 12.5
Brees           68.8          27.3            3.9              31                 15.0
Wilson          68.0          27.0            5.0              38                 22.2
Rodgers         66.4          30.0            3.6              36                  4.2
Carr            65.1          31.5            3.4              62                 12.5
Palmer          55.4          37.4            7.2              38                 10.3 

I figured let's add a couple of Vikings QB's to the mix. So I came up with Culpepper in 2003-04 and Favre in 2009. Obviously their best years on the Vikings. Now, granted, they did go down field more often. But the numbers are not that much greater.

Code: Select all

                BLOS-10yards   11-30 yards     31-40 yards   % comp 31-40
Culpepper 03       69.7          23.7             6.6             50
Culpepper 04       67.8          23.4             8.8             28
Favre 2009         70.6          25.1             4.3             43
Last edited by Raptorman on Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
Post Reply