Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:53 pm
Please re-read. I did not bring up the past until you did. My point is simple: Suh was fined for his actions on Sunday. Allen's actions (which you brought up) was two years ago. I stated that it was irrelevant what Allen did. I am simply pointing out, that if you want to use actions (2 years old) to mitigate Suh's action's on Sunday, then it's perfectly reasonable to bring up Suh's past actions as well. Either we bring up the past (in which case Suh's actions of the past are fair game) or we don't (in which case it is somewhat disingenuous to refer to Allen's past indiscretions). I'm simply asking what you would like to use as criteria and then we both be consistent with the application of the criteria.Iron Lion wrote: No. The conditional "if" failed because you guys are bringing up the past... re-read.
