Re: Vikings @ Bears Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 8
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 3:40 pm
For real.PurpleKoolaid wrote:Wonder if CP is worth a wooden nickle in a trade. Talk about a wasted first round pick.
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://vikingsmessageboard.com/
For real.PurpleKoolaid wrote:Wonder if CP is worth a wooden nickle in a trade. Talk about a wasted first round pick.
Missed this part. Lost to the Packers, Cards, Hawks, and Lions while beating KC and the Raiders. Given the Bears aren't a good team either I would suggest their record is perfectly understandable and yet there is nothing there to tell me the Vikings are better.Jordysghost wrote:
Who have the Bears beaten? Answer the question.
So because you have absolutely no reply to my point about the Bears having both a worse record, and just as weak of wins, if not weaker, you just are going to ignore it?SP1966 wrote: I'm not talking about those who place bets, but those who set the line. I understand that the people placing bets then affect how the line is adjusted, but lines rarely change so much as to change who is favored.
The Vikings record has virtually no meaning given who they've played. As the soft part of their schedule comes to an end they're going to really struggle, this team isn't good yet.
But there IS enough to tell you that the Bears should not be favored, it is called, their on field success. Not saying anyone is for sure without any doubt going to beat the other, only saying the Bears should not be expected to win going into this one, and they shouldn't. Because they haven't accomplished as much.SP1966 wrote: Missed this part. Lost to the Packers, Cards, Hawks, and Lions while beating KC and the Raiders. Given the Bears aren't a good team either I would suggest their record is perfectly understandable and yet there is nothing there to tell me the Vikings are better.
Look at the post prior the this ^^^ one, I missed the last part and posted my reply, not avoiding it at all.Jordysghost wrote: So because you have absolutely no reply to my point about the Bears having both a worse record, and just as weak of wins, if not weaker, you just are going to ignore it?
Stop ignoring the reply you cant refute, who have the Bears beaten to lead you to believe they should be favored over a team with 2 more wins then them?
I thought so toothat's an illegal hit,below the knees.