Gus?JEC334 wrote:
I guess Brett Favre was a good choice for us too. Brad Johnson, Gus Ferotte, Rich Gannon, all of those were good choices too.

Moderator: Moderators
Gus?JEC334 wrote:
I guess Brett Favre was a good choice for us too. Brad Johnson, Gus Ferotte, Rich Gannon, all of those were good choices too.
We were discussing franchise QBs and what makes him a franchise QB. I made the argument that franchise QBs are QBs who atleast take their team to the super bowl. Joe Kapp doesn't count because i said super bowl, not the NFL championship.MelanieMFunk wrote: You're losing it.![]()
Weren't y'all discussing quarterbacks who took the Vikings to the Super Bowl? Took not won, right? Kapp didn't?![]()
James, you posted after 1 in the morning. I'll let that be your excuse. Time for a little nappy nap.
Maybe because they want to?? Just because you're tired of my post doesn't mean you think for everyone else. And you of all people can't talk. Making a thread about Mike Wobshcall. I remember some weeks earlier you complaining about this thread saying that there were too many Ponder threads. But as you can see, this Ponder threads has a lot of views and replies so apparently a lot of members of this board liked this thread.Eli wrote: I don't know about anyone else, but this **** it getting old.
Why do you people keep responding to this guy?
I know. But maybe you should look more into it. Come back and let me know what it says about the Vikings/Chiefs Super Bowl and who was quarterback.JEC334 wrote: We were discussing franchise QBs and what makes him a franchise QB. I made the argument that franchise QBs are QBs who atleast take their team to the super bowl. Joe Kapp doesn't count because i said super bowl, not the NFL championship.
Holy crap I am so sick of this type of junk that I try not to read his outlandish posts unfortunately when he is quoted then I have to read them. Of course I was quite enlightened to know that Joe Kapp "did not play in a Super Bowl"Eli wrote: I don't know about anyone else, but this **** it getting old.
Why do you people keep responding to this guy?
MelanieMFunk wrote: I know. But maybe you should look more into it. Come back and let me know what it says about the Vikings/Chiefs Super Bowl and who was quarterback.
Yeah ya did! A big one! I've known you to be a bit loopy at times, so I'm not bothered by it. I'm sensing you're getting under a lot of people's skin on here though. It's kind of funny, though. If they think YOU are bad, they have NO idea how bad things can truly be on a message board. lol. I can assure them, it gets far far FAR worse than you.JEC334 wrote: Ahahahaha! I see I made an error. Okay, I made a mistake this time. I still stand by my post. We haven't had a franchise QB since Fran Tarkenton. ONLY because Kapp was here for 3 years or so. And what a crappy performance from him in the super bowl may I add. No wonder the Vikings didnt sign him back.![]()
Fran Tarkenton is still our only franchise QB, not because of him leading us to a super bowl as I DID state earlier, but because not only did he get us to some super bowls but he manage to stick with the team and play well for some years and became a household name. I didn't even know who this Joe Kapp scrub was until I had to research on the QB.
Believe me, we know and those of us who started out posting on the old Vikings newsgroup on usenet definitely know. That place was eventually overrun and ruined by idiots and trolls.MelanieMFunk wrote:Yeah ya did! A big one! I've known you to be a bit loopy at times, so I'm not bothered by it. I'm sensing you're getting under a lot of people's skin on here though. It's kind of funny, though. If they think YOU are bad, they have NO idea how bad things can truly be on a message board. lol. I can assure them, it gets far far FAR worse than you.
Oh, we know ... we just don't play those gamesMelanieMFunk wrote: If they think YOU are bad, they have NO idea how bad things can truly be on a message board. lol. I can assure them, it gets far far FAR worse than you.
I assure you, James doesn't "make up his own facts" to argue. He honestly believes what he's saying. He's not doing it to be a troll. With that said, he probably could do a little more research before he goes off on people. lol. Either way, he's not afraid to admit he's made a mistake. That's one good thing. It's a start!Cliff wrote: Oh, we know ... we just don't play those games
JEC334 in this post is about as far as we'll allow, honestly. It's certainly not a banable offense to get under someone's skin ... but when a person is making up their own facts just so they can argue with someone else it does start to call into question if they're just saying whatever they can to get a reaction, aka trolling ... we're not there yet though, I don't think
I have no idea what you're talking about.JEC334 wrote:Unlike my Kevin Williams and Sharrif Floyd thread that got hi-jacked with people posting pics of llamas.
dead_poet wrote: I have no idea what you're talking about.
Oh yes, people are creepers. There is one on this site, too. Not sure what it is about me that makes people want to get all up in my personal biz...but yeah. It's creepy no doubt. I guess I make it too tempting with my screen name being my real name.On the Vikings.com message board and the WeAreVikingsFan.Com boards, things usually got really heated back there. Probably because we didn't have any mods who actually monitor the boards. I remember one member found Melanie's myspace page and kept trying to find as much personal info that they could..