All this "I don't remember" crap from you guys lol come on it wasn't 50 years ago
Come on man really? He was screwing with an ex-teammate....you going to compare that to Suh kicking ball sack? Give me a break...I live and think in reality...come join me...
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:17 am
by Iron Lion
Also in case you didn't know, the Falcons' o-line has the reputation for being the dirtiest in the NFL. He was not an o-lineman but he was playing next to o-linemen as a blocker on the kick.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:19 am
by Funkytown
Iron Lion wrote:I didn't know former teammate = automatically best friends forever
You interpret it as a joke. I interpret it as "Yo dude, we been teammates so I know how you play, you pull that crap on me and I'm gonna defend myself like a potential rape victim"
...really? I'm not surprised you don't find the humor in this. Your sense of humor, is, well...off.
“Ray is obviously a former teammate and friend of mine.
And not best friends, but certainly friends.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:19 am
by Iron Lion
forgot the vikes were the kicking team ^
but I don't see in the article where he says it was a joke
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:20 am
by Iron Lion
Fine guys, don't own it.
BTW Suh is not a dirty player lawl.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:25 am
by Funkytown
Iron Lion wrote:Fine guys, don't own it.
BTW Suh is not a dirty player lawl.
Schwartz, is that you?
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:30 am
by Funkytown
Definitely a devastating hit.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:31 am
by Iron Lion
Got one that isn't in slomo?
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:38 am
by Funkytown
Iron Lion wrote:Got one that isn't in slomo?
No. I don't. That's the only one that I could find. Slow-mo or not--it was hardly a wicked hit. More like a little love tap. Again, this was a friendly little jab--it wasn't meant to really cause serious harm or injury. Comparing Suh to this is foolish. Honestly. People can laugh about this; you can't laugh at some of the crap Suh pulls. It's just plain wrong.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:22 am
by tnvikesfan
Sheesh, the only groin punch I remember seeing as an intentional hit perpetrated by a Viking was back in the day with Duane Clements. He racked the fire out of someone. Dirty? Hayelle Yes! Did I approve? No. If it weren't for the camera angle, it would probably never have been seen on national TV, refs didn't see it, no flags. I think he got a good fine out of it though.
The Vikes have had many hard hitters, but we've never had a really dirty player like Suh. Big difference.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:52 am
by Iron Lion
I just have a hard time believing JA is a class act, lol.
Stories from female reporters of him walking around naked in front of them. If I followed the Vikes close like you guys I'd know of the other things he's done so I could pretend I don't...
Bottom line, if you replace JA with Suh in the above vid, what do you guys read into it?
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:43 am
by Demi
Iron Lion wrote:I just have a hard time believing JA is a class act, lol.
Stories from female reporters of him walking around naked in front of them. If I followed the Vikes close like you guys I'd know of the other things he's done so I could pretend I don't...
Bottom line, if you replace JA with Suh in the above vid, what do you guys read into it?
Come on bro. Allen has had issues. And isn't "clean". But Suh is a dirty rat bastard who does it repeatedly. Is he a scum bag, or an idiot. He seems dense so I'll go with idiot. Allen hasn't had any issues since when? I was the first to get on him with that lame hit on Schaub, but it's more from playing hard..and now and then stupid than being dirty. Suh is dirty. he seems a guys crotch, he kicks it, arm? Stomp it. Knee? Helmet it. He's not very bright and gets out of control. There's a reason he's got a 100k fine and Allen hasn't done #### in over a year so come on man.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:18 am
by Iron Lion
I'm not putting JA in the same league as Suh in this conversation. Just saying JA is a little bit of a scumbag too. I know you don't like seeing that in print but you have to own it if you're going to go slinging this stuff at other teams. Otherwise you just sound like Jim Whinerbaugh to me.
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:28 am
by jackal
SUH has serious problems every year in the league ..
the Foot stomp was among one of the worst
Re: Suh Fined 100,000
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:11 am
by Just Me
Iron Lion wrote:I'm not putting JA in the same league as Suh in this conversation. Just saying JA is a little bit of a scumbag too. I know you don't like seeing that in print but you have to own it if you're going to go slinging this stuff at other teams. Otherwise you just sound like Jim Whinerbaugh to me.
But you are excusing (to a degree) his behavior of 4 days ago, by pointing out that others have engaged in bad behavior almost two years ago. I don't feel the need to defend Allen, because he shouldn't have done that. To keep this in perspective: What dirty play did Allen commit 4 days ago? Why is he even being discussed? (I know he has committed fouls he shouldn't have, and was rightly penalized for it. So what? He hasn't shown the regular propensity to commit such acts whereas Suh has. )
