PurpleKoolaid wrote:Why cut Sage and keep Webb? Insanity. Are they really going to try and make a QB out of him?

Moderator: Moderators
PurpleKoolaid wrote:Why cut Sage and keep Webb? Insanity. Are they really going to try and make a QB out of him?
Solid write up of this in the Strib: http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikin ... 83706.html80 PurplePride 84 wrote:Vikes cut Bowman to make room for Jefferson and Pat Brown to make room for Mark Asper an OL they claimed off waivers from BUF.
Jefferson has freak athleticism with 4.49 speed and a ridiculous 44" vertical at 6'0/193 from the 2010 Combine.Texas Vike wrote:Anyone know anything about Jefferson?
@TomPelissero: Spielman says scouting staff spent 38 consecutive hours in the office to get through cuts and the first waivers wave. #Vikings
@TomPelissero: Spielman says all 4 QBs played well. "Sage is a very good quarterback and has some value and you never know what happens down the road here"
I suspect that, if it actually becomes necessary, he'll be available. The Vikings may be figuring that, too.John_Viveiros wrote:I suspect that, with our luck with QB injuries, he'll be back soon enough.
You're not supposed to drink your own kool aid! Silly Spielman.Spielman says all 4 QBs played well.
Thank you summarized my whole thinking. Whats every ones LOVE INFATUATION with Sage? Hes 36 taking up Money and you really think the back up quarterback matters at this point considering we wont be making it to playoffs?soflavike wrote:I would have kept Webb and MBT as well. Sage looked terrible against Houston. Why pay an old, slow, never was all that good QB to hold a clipboard? We're not going to the playoffs, let's go with the young talent.
We still have to watch the product. And sorry watching Webb pretend to be a QB again isn't something I'm looking forward too. Considering we've had Webb, TJoke, Ponder...if (or when?) Ponder does go down, it'd be nice to have someone who has the ability to read a defense and make a catchable accurate throw. But I guess I'll have to wait for Matt Barkley, or some college junior to get to see that...Mercy Percy wrote: Thank you summarized my whole thinking. Whats every ones LOVE INFATUATION with Sage? Hes 36 taking up Money and you really think the back up quarterback matters at this point considering we wont be making it to playoffs?
Wow. I could not possibly disagree more. Rewatch the Detroit game, or the Philly game a year before. I can't take my eyes off the screen.Demi wrote: We still have to watch the product. And sorry watching Webb pretend to be a QB again isn't something I'm looking forward too.
childress had his pet project TJoke now frazier has his in joe webb.John_Viveiros wrote: Wow. I could not possibly disagree more. Rewatch the Detroit game, or the Philly game a year before. I can't take my eyes off the screen.
Sure. Sometimes it's like watching a forest fire... Terrible and awe inspiring at the same time.
There's a slight difference, though: Jackson was always being "groomed" to be the starter someday. Webb will be a back-up behind Ponder (assuming Ponder "pans out) whereas everyone knew that Favre/Rosenfels etc. were never going to be the "long-term" answer for us at QB, and so Jackson might potentially be the QB of the future. (Maybe he will be in Buffalo nowhibbingviking wrote: childress had his pet project TJoke now frazier has his in joe webb.
they should have brought someone in that could have seriously competed with ponder and pushed him. i have seen good moments from ponder at times but not great moments. i think they are just wasting time with joe webb as a qb.80 PurplePride 84 wrote: Not even close to the same thing or a good comparison.
Childress traded up for and groomed T-Jack to be his starter and still deemed him QBotF even after benching him for Gus Frerotte and signing Favre...twice. And the Vikings don't have any intention of Webb every being the starting QB, barring injuries.
Webb was kept at QB BY CHILLY so he could jettison Rosenfels.
The only reason Webb is still a QB at the moment is because he doesn't have good hands and isn't a crisp route runner. And the Vikes have nowhere to put him, but he's too talented an athlete to cut.
He's a good out of the bullpen QB, so to speak, but when teams have time to prepare for him he blows.
I'm not crying over the loss of Rosenfels he's old and mediocre. Most likely MBT will become nothing, but there's at some hope he can develop into a decent backup. You know what you have in Sage.
And for the Ponder haters/detractors/non-believers you should be happy our backups are so bad because if Ponder gets hurt or benched we'll win even less games than we're projected to now and be right in the Barkley sweepstakes.
I think that's a good assessment of the situation regarding both T-Jack and Webb.80 PurplePride 84 wrote:Childress traded up for and groomed T-Jack to be his starter and still deemed him QBotF even after benching him for Gus Frerotte and signing Favre...twice. And the Vikings don't have any intention of Webb every being the starting QB, barring injuries.
Webb was kept at QB BY CHILLY so he could jettison Rosenfels.
The only reason Webb is still a QB at the moment is because he doesn't have good hands and isn't a crisp route runner. And the Vikes have nowhere to put him, but he's too talented an athlete to cut.
He's a good out of the bullpen QB, so to speak, but when teams have time to prepare for him he blows.
I'm not crying over the loss of Rosenfels he's old and mediocre. Most likely MBT will become nothing, but there's at some hope he can develop into a decent backup. You know what you have in Sage.
And for the Ponder haters/detractors/non-believers you should be happy our backups are so bad because if Ponder gets hurt or benched we'll win even less games than we're projected to now and be right in the Barkley sweepstakes.