Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8621
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1072

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by VikingLord »

StumpHunter wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:14 pm
VikingLord wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 12:59 pm

First of all, the defense gave up 16.

Second of all, holding every opponent to even 13 points from here on out isn't good if the offense can't score more than 6. So my short answer to your hypothetical is "it depends".

I really wish I could see yesterday's defensive performance as a success like you do. It was not a good performance, not for the defensive talent the Vikings have and not against a hobbled Bear offense.
Defense gave up 13. 3 came on a drive when the defense moved the Bears back 5 yards. I am not going to blame them for those 3, but you feel free too, since 16 is still a good day by reasonable standards.
The Bears came out to start the 3rd and immediately created a turnover and put their offense in a favorable position to score more points.

But in your view, the Vikings defense can't be expected to create one of its own to do the same for its offense?
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:58 pm
The negotiator wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 12:57 pm
Stump, I’m talking specifically about yesterday’s game. He can throw for 4000-4500 yds a year since he became a starter, so we know he can throw. What do you think about my other points I brought up? I can easily point to the Packer game and say it was on him for that last throw. I don’t have any problem saying when he makes a bad play. But to lay it on him because of his track record Is unfair.
It’s like Kirk says “ a qb gets too much credit when the team wins, and too much blame when they lose.” This team will be an 8-8 or 9-7 team unless they come up with a better offensive scheme against teams with really good defensive front fours. Our coaches ability to adjust on the fly just isn’t there.
Exactly. Cousins didnt just forget how to throw a football or somehow become wildly inaccurate. Like I said before, this offense is now becoming the opposite of Flips. Too much run vs too little pass. I begged to run the ball last year and now it's an overwhelming amount and we look like we dont know how to pass a football.

Pass Under Flip- 13th
Pass Under Stef/Kub- 31st

Run Under Flip- 30th
Run Under Stef/Kub- 3rd

.....one-dimensional offenses

Flip and Stefanski/Kub are complete opposites of each other that have put too much time into one aspect of the offense and not enough in the other. Guys can blame Cousins, the OL, or whatever all you want. Theee single biggest change that happened to this team compared to 2017 was the loss of Pat Shurmur

And just to throw this in here.....

Run under Shurmur- 7th
Pass under Shurmur- 11th

................B.A.L.A.N.C.E.


Like, does it honestly make sense that in 2018 we were 13th in passing and now all of the sudden we're 31st?? When we have the same QB, same top 2 WRs, same TE plus a good rookie, slightly different OL (neither being good). And guys want to blame Cousins? And play dumb like Cousins isnt a good passer now when he has been his whole career. Zimmer has drastically failed at finding an offensive coordinator that can do his job and do it effectively other than Pat Shurmur. Turner wasnt it, Flip wasnt it and looks like Stefanski isnt it.

But yeah, screw Kirk Cousins. He's where the blame goes.....give me a break. There is such a bigger picture to all this that some of you are failing to see. Instead you sit in front of your TV on Sundays with a composition notebook taking notes on what Kirk doesnt do well, recognizing what else goes wrong on the team and drafts up reasons that #8 is still to blame. I'm almost at the point where I no longer want Cousins on the team because he has consumed so much of this board with argument, defending, finger pointing, etc. Obviously not his fault but for some of our own sanity that's how I sometimes feel. It's the apologists (also known as guys that look at the big picture) vs. the haters. There could be a thread on here about the 1970 Minnesota Vikings and somehow Cousins name will be brought up in that and what he did wrong since he's been here. It's baffling
Here's where I have to disagree with you, PHP ... and it goes beyond stats and into the eye test.

Kirk Cousins is afraid of the rush.

It's obvious. You can see it in his eyes. He's seeing the rush instead of feeling it, and that's hurting the Vikings. Not only that, the league has caught on, sure as I'm sitting here. Film don't lie.

Yes, the pass protection needs to improve. I mean, the strip-sack was all on Reiff. Horrible effort against Mack, a guy you just can't have a horrible effort against. But Kirk is flinching from the rush, and every team in the league knows it. Look for the rest of the NFL to now put max pressure on Cousins every passing down ... and they'll do it until he proves he can beat them. It's gonna be a feeding frenzy until he steps up.

I am not a Cousins hater. You know that. I was singing the praises of the Vikings organization when they signed him. But there's no other way to put it ... he's stinking up the field this year. That overthrow to Thielen would have changed the entire complexion of the game. And the fumbles. He just doesn't value ball security in the pocket ... or he panics and forgets. Neither works.

Hate to bring it up again, but there was one other big difference between 2017 and the next two years, and that was Case Keenum. The guy played his butt off for the Vikings. His mobility and ability to avoid sacks saved a mediocre offensive line so many times that year, it's almost impossible to count. Every single time he escaped, that's a time Cousins likely fails to make a play. Please don't start with the "Keenum is garbage" theme. I'm not talking about his overall career. I'm talking about 2017, and he wasn't garbage then. That's the only comment I'm making here, and I'm making it because you're attributing all the difference to Pat Shurmur. I disagree somewhat. If Cousins were playing as well as Keenum did in 2017, we'd likely be undefeated.

When the Vikings signed Cousins, I was convinced that the coaching staff, front office and fans in Washington just weren't willing to give him the time of day. The more I watch him play, especially against teams that can get pressure on the quarterback, the more I think they may have been right. The ugly truth is that Kirk Cousins seems to be great in shorts and helmets, but when the pads come on, there's just something missing.

The Vikings are in a real pickle here. They have a very talented roster. But they're not getting even minimum quarterback play out of Cousins right now, and he's got 28 games and about $49 million in guaranteed salary left to go. We're sorta stuck with whatever he can give us, so he needs to improve. As Thielen said, the NFL is not going to let you rush for 180 yards a game. You have to be able to throw the ball when you need to.

Again, not a hater. Just stating the obvious. I want Kirk Cousins to succeed in the worst way, but he's got to play better if we're going to have a chance.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

Mothman wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:09 pm
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:58 pmBut yeah, screw Kirk Cousins. He's where the blame goes.....give me a break. There is such a bigger picture to all this that some of you are failing to see. Instead you sit in front of your TV on Sundays with a composition notebook taking notes on what Kirk doesnt do well, recognizing what else goes wrong on the team and drafts up reasons that #8 is still to blame. I'm almost at the point where I no longer want Cousins on the team because he has consumed so much of this board with argument, defending, finger pointing, etc. Obviously not his fault but for some of our own sanity that's how I sometimes feel. It's the apologists (also known as guys that look at the big picture) vs. the haters. There could be a thread on here about the 1970 Minnesota Vikings and somehow Cousins name will be brought up in that and what he did wrong since he's been here. It's baffling
If criticism of Cousins baffles you, I don't know what the heck you're watching. You raised some good points about the coordinators but Cousins was awful yesterday and he was pretty bad in the loss to GB too. Yesterday, he continually threw inaccurate passes, coughed the ball up more than once and wilted under pressure. Sure, he made some good throws too but he did not, by any reasonable measure of QB performance, play well. He deserves criticism.
Never said he didnt deserve criticism. I've said multiple times he's had his own wrong doings this year. What I said was baffling is that he is brought up in every thread at one point or another, usually by a hater, which then starts the same old argument, and so on. I would have to imagine the name "Cousins" has been typed more than any other name ever on this board. If that's not over the top then idk what is. It's impossible to discuss anything without saying "Cousins" on this board anymore. Again, usually the same guys beating a dead horse.

All I'm saying is, you wanna criticize then criticize but be fair about who and what you're criticizing. Instead of letting your hatred for #8 take over the board. I will tell you when Cousins does wrong, Zim does wrong, the D does wrong, etc. Others will go as far as defending this OL just to say Cousins is bad. Yes that is also baffling.

I saw a stat that two of the Bears sacks yesterday were the fastest sacks in the NFL in week 4. Guess what two they were? Yup, the two that Cousins fumbled. But that's "Kirk holding the ball too long" or "Kirk not protecting the football". Again, this is what drives me nuts. Like do fans think I'm lying when I say Cousins was sacked the second he hit the back of his 7 step drop from under center?? That also happened in GB. But somehow this OL has been defended. It's all just baffling to me
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:45 pm
Mothman wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:09 pm

If criticism of Cousins baffles you, I don't know what the heck you're watching. You raised some good points about the coordinators but Cousins was awful yesterday and he was pretty bad in the loss to GB too. Yesterday, he continually threw inaccurate passes, coughed the ball up more than once and wilted under pressure. Sure, he made some good throws too but he did not, by any reasonable measure of QB performance, play well. He deserves criticism.
Never said he didnt deserve criticism. I've said multiple times he's had his own wrong doings this year. What I said was baffling is that he is brought up in every thread at one point or another, usually by a hater, which then starts the same old argument, and so on. I would have to imagine the name "Cousins" has been typed more than any other name ever on this board. If that's not over the top then idk what is.
Four words.

Eighty four million dollars.

When you're a quarterback who makes that kind of money, all guaranteed, you are going to take criticism. If you play poorly, you should expect that criticism to increase exponentially. This is especially true in the salary-cap era, when resource allocation is far more important than individual salaries. We're investing 15% of our salary cap on a single player. Criticism -- good or bad -- comes with the territory.

It's not over the top. It's what Kirk Cousins should expect. And you know, I'm sure he does. After all, Kirk says all the right things in press conferences. But you can say all the right things and still play bad football.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by Mothman »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:45 pm
Mothman wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:09 pm

If criticism of Cousins baffles you, I don't know what the heck you're watching. You raised some good points about the coordinators but Cousins was awful yesterday and he was pretty bad in the loss to GB too. Yesterday, he continually threw inaccurate passes, coughed the ball up more than once and wilted under pressure. Sure, he made some good throws too but he did not, by any reasonable measure of QB performance, play well. He deserves criticism.
Never said he didnt deserve criticism. I've said multiple times he's had his own wrong doings this year. What I said was baffling is that he is brought up in every thread at one point or another, usually by a hater, which then starts the same old argument, and so on. I would have to imagine the name "Cousins" has been typed more than any other name ever on this board. If that's not over the top then idk what is. It's impossible to discuss anything without saying "Cousins" on this board anymore. Again, usually the same guys beating a dead horse.

All I'm saying is, you wanna criticize then criticize but be fair about who and what you're criticizing. Instead of letting your hatred for #8 take over the board. I will tell you when Cousins does wrong, Zim does wrong, the D does wrong, etc. Others will go as far as defending this OL just to say Cousins is bad. Yes that is also baffling.

I saw a stat that two of the Bears sacks yesterday were the fastest sacks in the NFL in week 4. Guess what two they were? Yup, the two that Cousins fumbled. But that's "Kirk holding the ball too long" or "Kirk not protecting the football". Again, this is what drives me nuts. Like do fans think I'm lying when I say Cousins was sacked the second he hit the back of his 7 step drop from under center?? That also happened in GB. But somehow this OL has been defended. It's all just baffling to me
I understand. We saw that sort of hyperbolic blaming when Ponder was QB too. He was blamed for things well beyond his control.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by Mothman »

J. Kapp 11 wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:41 pmThe Vikings are in a real pickle here. They have a very talented roster. But they're not getting even minimum quarterback play out of Cousins right now, and he's got 28 games and about $49 million in guaranteed salary left to go. We're sorta stuck with whatever he can give us, so he needs to improve. As Thielen said, the NFL is not going to let you rush for 180 yards a game. You have to be able to throw the ball when you need to.

Again, not a hater. Just stating the obvious. I want Kirk Cousins to succeed in the worst way, but he's got to play better if we're going to have a chance.
If he doesn't get better they may have to just eat his contract at the end of the year and move on, even if that proves painful.

A pickle indeed...
StumpHunter
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
x 646

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by StumpHunter »

Mothman wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:03 pm
StumpHunter wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:45 pmWe had 10 possessions in that game and scored on one. That is why the team lost.

What do you suppose the record is of teams who only score on one possession?

How about of teams who's defense holds the opposition to 13?

One is a negative, the other is a positive, yet we focus on the positive as a place for improvement? Bizarre.
It's not bizarre and they gave up 16, not 13.

Points allowed is a limited measure of defensive performance. As Mike has pointed out, the Vikings defense struggled to get off the field. That had a significant impact on the game. The Bears dominated time of possession, controlled the line of scrimmage and even though they were settling for FGs most of the game, moved the ball effectively.

The offense's inability to score is reason #1 the Vikings lost, not the only reason. The defense didn't get the job done either. Both units need to improve.
Seems reasonable to blame them for giving up 3 points on a -5 yard drive. Fine 16. Still way below the league average.

Points allowed is the only stat that matters in the end, since you know, games are won and lost by points scored?
vikesrock
Waterboy
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by vikesrock »

THE WHOLE TEAM SUCKED YESTERDAY PERIOD! INCLUDING THE COACHING! I mean a freakin throw 2 yards short of the goal line for the 2 point conversion. Nice call there = pathetic, now with that off my chest, Cousins doesn't look like the answer we have been hoping for for years! The dude's nice and all that,but if he even played decent we would have beat the Peckers. This game yesterday he sucked in, but you can put the blame on everyone for that game!

As far as Cousins, the brass better start thinking about drafting the future, because barring a miracle this guy could put us into another year of misery waiting on the long waited Super Bowl Championship hopes. We need a solid QB before this team needs to hit the restart button! :wallbang:
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by halfgiz »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:45 pm
Mothman wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:09 pm

If criticism of Cousins baffles you, I don't know what the heck you're watching. You raised some good points about the coordinators but Cousins was awful yesterday and he was pretty bad in the loss to GB too. Yesterday, he continually threw inaccurate passes, coughed the ball up more than once and wilted under pressure. Sure, he made some good throws too but he did not, by any reasonable measure of QB performance, play well. He deserves criticism.
Never said he didnt deserve criticism. I've said multiple times he's had his own wrong doings this year. What I said was baffling is that he is brought up in every thread at one point or another, usually by a hater, which then starts the same old argument, and so on. I would have to imagine the name "Cousins" has been typed more than any other name ever on this board. If that's not over the top then idk what is. It's impossible to discuss anything without saying "Cousins" on this board anymore. Again, usually the same guys beating a dead horse.

All I'm saying is, you wanna criticize then criticize but be fair about who and what you're criticizing. Instead of letting your hatred for #8 take over the board. I will tell you when Cousins does wrong, Zim does wrong, the D does wrong, etc. Others will go as far as defending this OL just to say Cousins is bad. Yes that is also baffling.

I saw a stat that two of the Bears sacks yesterday were the fastest sacks in the NFL in week 4. Guess what two they were? Yup, the two that Cousins fumbled. But that's "Kirk holding the ball too long" or "Kirk not protecting the football". Again, this is what drives me nuts. Like do fans think I'm lying when I say Cousins was sacked the second he hit the back of his 7 step drop from under center?? That also happened in GB. But somehow this OL has been defended. It's all just baffling to me
I don't think your lying. In your eyes your opinion is the only one that is right and everybody else is wrong. :lol:
The one fumble was on Cousins...You got to protect the ball,which he failed to do...no excuses.
With that kind of pressure why was Cousins taking a 7 step drop.

I also think Zimmer needs to stay away from QB's and Kickers. He messes them up.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by Mothman »

StumpHunter wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 4:02 pmSeems reasonable to blame them for giving up 3 points on a -5 yard drive.
They played well on that possession under the circumstances but statistically, they still allowed 3 points. That's just how it works.
Points allowed is the only stat that matters in the end, since you know, games are won and lost by points scored?
The final score is the bottom line but it's simplistic to act as if it's the only factor worth examining when discussing the quality of a unit's performance. The defense's job isn't just to keep the opposing team off the scoreboard. It's to get the opposing offense off the field as soon as possible. Time of possession matters. Field position matters. These factors influence the final outcome and any football fan knows this as surely as they understand that games are won and lost by points scored.
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8621
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1072

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by VikingLord »

Mothman wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 5:29 pm
StumpHunter wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 4:02 pmSeems reasonable to blame them for giving up 3 points on a -5 yard drive.
They played well on that possession under the circumstances but statistically, they still allowed 3 points. That's just how it works.
Points allowed is the only stat that matters in the end, since you know, games are won and lost by points scored?
The final score is the bottom line but it's simplistic to act as if it's the only factor worth examining when discussing the quality of a unit's performance. The defense's job isn't just to keep the opposing team off the scoreboard. It's to get the opposing offense off the field as soon as possible. Time of possession matters. Field position matters. These factors influence the final outcome and any football fan knows this as surely as they understand that games are won and lost by points scored.
I think it goes even a bit farther than that.

The defense's job is also to make the offense uncomfortable. Keep them out of a groove. Show some anticipation and make them doubt what they're doing. Give them something to worry about and something to think about.

I really haven't seen the Vikings do that all year so far. The formula seems to be to let the 4 down linemen rush and concede the underneath routes in the passing game, then tackle while throwing in a blitz here and there. It can be boiled down to a basic mentality of keeping everything in front. They've been better against the run, although the Packers went off on them a bit, mostly because they got so far ahead they could afford to keep pounding it. But the basic mentality is a very typical one of make the offense run plays. The more plays they run, the more likely they are to make a mistake that gets the Vikings off the field.

The thing is, what if the offense isn't making mistakes? What if they're executing on those shorter plays in front and extending drives as the Bears were doing all day? What if the opposing QB is so comfortable he feels like he's running the scout team in practice? Where is the adjustment? Why not throw a little more aggression at a backup QB and try to make him uncomfortable by either trying to generate a little more pressure with extra rushers or maybe jumping on a few short routes to try to put some doubt into his mind?

No, the Vikings defense under Zimmer is content to play the same formulaic approach regardless of the situation. If the offense makes mistakes, it works. If it doesn't, they end up on the field for long, soul-crushing drives that take up the bulk of whole quarters.
User avatar
Bowhunting Viking
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 813
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2018 11:39 am
Location: Convoy, Ohio
x 421

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by Bowhunting Viking »

Did anybody else see Total Access on NFL Network a little bit ago when they asked Kurt Warner if the Vikes can rely on Cousins to win games. He gave a 2 part answer. His 1st point was that he didn't think they want him to have to pass 30 - 35 times a game. But his 2nd point kinda mirrored something that myself and others have kinda hinted at.. the $84 million. He said he sees Cousins playing tentative , and is worrying about the big contract and not just playing loose and , his words, ripping the ball and letting it go like he has the arm for.
Just repeating what a HOF SB MVP is saying about him.
Like I said , I know that myself and others have wondered if that is part of his head problem.
I just wanna die as a Super Bowl Champion Viking Fan!!
Purple Domination
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 552
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:07 pm
Location: Austin, TX
x 59

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by Purple Domination »

I agree with Kapp, Cousins is scared of the rush. You can see him grimace before he is even hit. Have you ever seen him stand in the pocket and deliver a throw when he knows he’s taking a hit?
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by halfgiz »

Bowhunting Viking wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 7:20 pm Did anybody else see Total Access on NFL Network a little bit ago when they asked Kurt Warner if the Vikes can rely on Cousins to win games. He gave a 2 part answer. His 1st point was that he didn't think they want him to have to pass 30 - 35 times a game. But his 2nd point kinda mirrored something that myself and others have kinda hinted at.. the $84 million. He said he sees Cousins playing tentative , and is worrying about the big contract and not just playing loose and , his words, ripping the ball and letting it go like he has the arm for.
Just repeating what a HOF SB MVP is saying about him.
Like I said , I know that myself and others have wondered if that is part of his head problem.
Here is the thing, Zimmer doesn't want him doing that. He wants a boring controlled game.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: Kirk Cousins is just NOT a big game quarterback

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

halfgiz wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 5:01 pm
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:45 pm

Never said he didnt deserve criticism. I've said multiple times he's had his own wrong doings this year. What I said was baffling is that he is brought up in every thread at one point or another, usually by a hater, which then starts the same old argument, and so on. I would have to imagine the name "Cousins" has been typed more than any other name ever on this board. If that's not over the top then idk what is. It's impossible to discuss anything without saying "Cousins" on this board anymore. Again, usually the same guys beating a dead horse.

All I'm saying is, you wanna criticize then criticize but be fair about who and what you're criticizing. Instead of letting your hatred for #8 take over the board. I will tell you when Cousins does wrong, Zim does wrong, the D does wrong, etc. Others will go as far as defending this OL just to say Cousins is bad. Yes that is also baffling.

I saw a stat that two of the Bears sacks yesterday were the fastest sacks in the NFL in week 4. Guess what two they were? Yup, the two that Cousins fumbled. But that's "Kirk holding the ball too long" or "Kirk not protecting the football". Again, this is what drives me nuts. Like do fans think I'm lying when I say Cousins was sacked the second he hit the back of his 7 step drop from under center?? That also happened in GB. But somehow this OL has been defended. It's all just baffling to me
I don't think your lying. In your eyes your opinion is the only one that is right and everybody else is wrong. :lol:
The one fumble was on Cousins...You got to protect the ball,which he failed to do...no excuses.
With that kind of pressure why was Cousins taking a 7 step drop.

I also think Zimmer needs to stay away from QB's and Kickers. He messes them up.
Dude what?! It was one of the fastest sacks of week 4. THATS how bad and how quickly Reiff got burned. And cousins was about to pull the ball back to throw. He shouldn’t have to tuck the ball in 2 seconds. His blind side got burned. I would say he’s doing what he’s suppose to be doing in the sense of doing a 7 step drop, and throwing it within 3-4 seconds. But I guess since his LT was burned in a millisecond that’s on cousins....

And why is he doing a 7 step drop? Because that’s what the play calls for. Every play has specific drop backs to them. Are you really trying to fault cousins for taking a 7 step drop?!
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
Post Reply