Pondering Her Percy wrote:But my question is, you aren't sure what they are doing in what sense?? We're looking into nickel DBs, we're looking into RBs, looking into WRs, etc. Plus we have the draft. And signed two offensive tackles. Outside of CP and Cap, we really lost very little. And both are definitely replaceable. There is no replacement for CP when it comes to KR but as a WR, definitely. I don't understand what everyone is so upset about. We go out and fill huge tackle voids which is what everyone wanted and there are still fans that aren't pleased. I don't get it.
Take off the purple goggles you're wearing over your purple glasses for a minute and maybe you will. Just
think, for Pete's sake. You literally wrote the following earlier in this same thread:
But lets go get more injury prone tackles like Okung or Clady and hope everything is ok.....oh wait, or maybe Mr. Inconsistency Matt Kalil 2.0 in Riley Reiff.

And we wonder why this OL wont get any better. Because we never want to spend any money on it via FA and dont draft them. We just get a bunch of has-beens
Now you expect us to believe you're genuinely puzzled because people aren't thrilled about the signings of Reiff and Remmers? I know, you were freaking out and now you've calmed down. Nevertheless, your opinion of these two players wasn't so high before they suddenly became Vikings and now you seem to expect everybody to be impressed that Spielman actually paid a premium for a couple of free agent cast-offs to play tackle. That's taking homer-ism to another level.
If Newman and Peterson are both gone, along with Munnerlyn and Patterson, those are all significant losses. Newman and Munnerlyn have both played very important roles in the Vikings defense over the last 3 years. Just because you think Peterson is washed up, that doesn't mean everybody does and washed-up or not, his likely departure leaves a big void at RB. Patterson's one of the best special teams players in the game and although he's replaceable at WR, he had moved into the #3 spot last season and was doing some good things. Nobody is irreplaceable but these guys all played their positiosn well enough that replacing them with players of equal or greater value isn't a given. There's room for a little uncertainty and disappointment.
We didnt let Danielle Hunter and Stefon Diggs go. It was a nickel back and a #3-4 WR. They are two replaceable players. Look at the contracts up next year. We need the money for much more valuable players other than a nickel back that wanted to play outside and signed a 4 year deal at age 29 and a good kick returner. I wouldve like to have CP back but its not the end of the world
Nobody is saying it's the end of the world. They're saying they would have liked the Vikes to keep him. It's not the same thing.