Jordysghost wrote: Lol I bet your a Moss fan.
Oh, Wisconsin, when will you teach your students basic grammar like the difference between "your" and "you're"? The legacy of Scott Walker.
Moderator: Moderators
Jordysghost wrote: Lol I bet your a Moss fan.
Yea, must always remember to uphold the staunch formality of a sports message board.Texas Vike wrote:
Oh, Wisconsin, when will you teach your students basic grammar like the difference between "your" and "you're"? The legacy of Scott Walker.
Staunch formalityJordysghost wrote:
Yea, must always remember to uphold the staunch formality of a sports message board.
I dont live in WI.
Born, yea, though it doesnt feel like it. Raised? Hard to say, spent alot of time there but spent more time elsewhere.Texas Vike wrote: Staunch formality
You live in the tower of Babel now, but I suspect you were born and raised in WI.
I think Brady is more consistent, Rodgers can get into slumps as we saw this year and in the past. But at the risk of over inflating Jordy's head, when Rodgers is hot, I think he's the best in the game.Mothman wrote: I'd take Brady any day.
I hate listening to Buck and Aikman fawn all over Rodgers. It gets tiresome.
Which isn't accurate.S197 wrote: I think Brady is more consistent, Rodgers can get into slumps as we saw this year and in the past. But at the risk of over inflating Jordy's head, when Rodgers is hot, I think he's the best in the game.
Not similarly. Moss was on a much higher level of d bag, you call Aaron a #### because you perceive him as 'Smug' or 'Arrogant'.Texas Vike wrote:
Anyways, Erin's dbaggery shouldn't squelch your fondness for him. He's a heck of a player. Similarly, the fact that Moss did some idiotic things didn't hinder me from being a fan.
Jordysghost wrote: Not similarly. Moss was on a much higher level of d bag, you call Aaron a #### because you perceive him as 'Smug' or 'Arrogant'.
Moss is remembered as one of the games most legendary d bags because he was a crying little diva who walked off the field on his own team while a game was occuring.
There is nothing to suggest that, your just using it as a lame insult.Texas Vike wrote:
You have always exaggerated Moss's weak points. His goal post wipe seems to have offended your very soul.
Isn't 2015 in the past? He had a string of bad games in 2015 and 2016. He missed significant time in 2013 so throw that season out. That's 3 out of the last 4 years. I'm not going to go and dredge up anything before then. I think Brady is more consistent, stats aren't everything and its my opinion.Jordysghost wrote:Btw, "In the past"? When has Rodgers ever had any sort of slump prior to 2015? He hasnt. Ever.
You say "Throw that season out", and then apparently count it as one of his 'Slumps'. 3 of the past 4 years? Dont you mean two of the last 3?S197 wrote: Isn't 2015 in the past? He had a string of bad games in 2015 and 2016. He missed significant time in 2013 so throw that season out. That's 3 out of the last 4 years. I'm not going to go and dredge up anything before then. I think Brady is more consistent, stats aren't everything and its my opinion.
Tl;dr - Shutup Meg.
It's not just perceived that way by Vikings fans.Jordysghost wrote:You prove an interesting point on Ridgers, anyone else has his last two years and its great, but because Rodgers set his own bar so incredibly high, he is perceived as 'Slumping'. Literally not one other player in history would get as much #### for the years he just had.
Seems like a slump to me. YMMV.HOW BAD HAS AARON RODGERS GOTTEN?
How bad is Aaron Rodgers playing right now?
Brace yourself for this.
Pro Football Focus, which grades every play of every game, just gave Rodgers the worst single-game grade of his career. He earned a 33.0 for Sunday’s loss to the Minnesota Vikings. That falls into PFF’s “poor” categorization, which is also their lowest or worst categorization. On the season, Rodgers’ grade thus far is 42.6, also classified as poor.
Want to see something even more depressing?
Rodgers is playing quarterback at a similar level to the San Francisco 49ers’ Blaine Gabbert.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cs0DwWwW8AAaacb.jpg
I never said it was, thats the point, Rodgers set his own bar far too high.Cliff wrote: It's not just perceived that way by Vikings fans.
http://www.totalpackers.com/2016/09/bad ... rs-gotten/
Seems like a slump to me. YMMV.
During that 8 game stretch he was matching Blaine Gabbert's stats so ... sure, by the end of the year he had done well enough to bring his numbers up, but during that window he was awful.Jordysghost wrote:I never said it was, thats the point, Rodgers set his own bar far too high.
Who cares about some pff nonsense? I prefer real stats, NFL statistics, and they seem to indicate that even in this "slump" year, Rodgers just put up as good a year as Brady has put up since he went 18-1. (With the possible and arguable exception of Bradys current year)
Why was Bradys 2013 not looked at as a super ultra mega slump? He had a 25-11 Td to int ratio and an 87.3 rating, Rodgers has never had a season that bad in his life, if 31-8 td to int ratio and a rating of 92.7 is a slump, then Brady has had multiple worse slumps in his career.
Point blank, its only a slump by Rodgers own standard, anyone else puts up those years and its a great/good year.