Texas Vike wrote:That is a concern, though a broken foot is better than an ACL or other major joint injury history. I am a bit concerned about his burst off the line and his route running too, especially considering whether his talent warrants the 11th overall pick. We have to go BPA I think. We just have too many holes.
Agreed and honestly, based on what I know of him, Parker doesn't strike me as an 11th pick in the draft talent, which isn't to say he couldn't be a good addition to the Vikes or a successful NFL player.
I thought this was a good write up on players in the non-playoff bowls:
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/nfl- ... ears-bowls[/quote]
Thanks for that link. Lippett's intriguing, Gordon's a stud and I'm very interested in seeing how petty performs at the Senior Bowl and how he'll do at the next level.
I'm very much in the BPA camp. The Vikes need impact players. They failed to score 20 points in 9 of 16 games this year. Their run defense struggled too much. they need playmakers that can help them close out games or better yet, to just put games out of reach.
One position I really doubt they'll draft in R1 is OT. It's possible, but I thought Kalil's game picked up down the stretch and I didn't get the impression the team was as down on him as fans and the media were. Loadholt's basically entrenched at RT. Unless a tackle they just feel is way too good to pass up falls into their lap at #11, I doubt they'll go in that direction.