Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Superman
Backup
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:07 pm

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by Superman »

I almost don't want Ponder to score and pad his stats. But I love the Vikes more than I dislike ponder, so let's get a quick meaningless 7 points.
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by halfgiz »

saint33 wrote:If we had cut ponder we'd be seeing harnish right now and still paying ponder.

Regardless though, people can talk about the protection or the receivers or the defense all you want. Ponder is the xfactor in this game. You can't compete with a performance like this out of your QB.
His QB passer rating this game is 26.917 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8621
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1072

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by VikingLord »

McCarthy is laughing on the sideline!!!! LOL

He probably realizes it's not in his team's best interest to hasten the Vikings getting rid of Ponder, so he told his defense to let them score.
User avatar
me4get
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:41 pm
Location: NW IOWA
x 2

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by me4get »

halfgiz wrote: His QB passer rating this game is 26.917 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
higher than his IQ probably.
Viking fan since '65
User avatar
purplenoway
Rookie
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:12 pm
x 1

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by purplenoway »

It's all garbage time now, can we just forfeit the 4th quarter and go home?
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by PurpleMustReign »

Crax wrote: Not sure what that means, but I wouldn't wish ponder on anyone, except maybe the saints.
I don't understand it either. What exactly did we deserve? How did we deserve this???
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
frosted
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2157
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:30 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by frosted »

VikingLord wrote:McCarthy is laughing on the sideline!!!! LOL

He probably realizes it's not in his team's best interest to hasten the Vikings getting rid of Ponder, so he told his defense to let them score.
It's also in his best interest to lose weight, but he can't stand to cut the Twinkies out. This is what this game has brought me to - fat jokes.
Leafman
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:54 am
Location: Houston, TX USA
Contact:

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by Leafman »

purplenoway wrote:It's all garbage time now, can we just forfeit the 4th quarter and go home?
Now that the Vikings scored to cover the over to offset my IDIOTIC bet on the Vikes to cover ... Yes, they can forfeit.

LEAFMAN THE PURPLE FAN
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by Demi »

SP1966 wrote: Typically 3rd stringers are developmental players, Ponder is developmentally challenged.
Exactly! Rookie / Veteran. Starter / Backup. Developmental.

Why did SPIELTARD keep Ponder? We had a veteran, a rookie, get a guy for the scout team. Get a guy with potential. Don't keep your overpaid FAILURE.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: So it's Spielmans fault for holding onto him as a 3rd string QB????.....he's a 3rd string QB, they are ALL BAD. Hence why they are 3rd string
Yeah, but not all are as bad as #7. Some have hopes of playing in the NFL one day. Coaches grooming a 3rd string. I said we should have dumped #7 when we dropped MBT. I was right. Its time to just dump him. Not that #7 was the only problem today, but he HURT us, not helped us. He has regressed even further.
frosted
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2157
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:30 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by frosted »

At least I get to add to the Dirty Harry tracker...


I just puked - POOOOOONNNNNNDDDDDDEEEEERRRRRRRR!!!!!
frosted
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2157
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:30 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by frosted »

Jerick is good. I can't wait to see Ted back under center.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by Demi »

McKinnon did more on that run than Asiata has done to make some yards all season.

And our safety? If it isn't Smith, we might as well play one man down. No where in coverage, and Blanton getting run over every other play. Should have kept Chris Crocker huh Zimmer? :lol:
TeddyB
Backup
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 1:59 pm

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by TeddyB »

Guion has 2 sacks...what a joke
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5

Post by Demi »

Could have kept Guion and kept that big free agent money we spent on fat guy with a bullet in his leg. And likely no real loss in performance.

3 points over Ponder in there for another down. Good choice Zimmer.
Last edited by Demi on Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply