I don't see you complaining regardless of who the Vikings pick. It's just not your style.Mothman wrote: Thanks for the link!
I certainly won't complain if the Vikings draft him.

Moderator: Moderators
I don't see you complaining regardless of who the Vikings pick. It's just not your style.Mothman wrote: Thanks for the link!
I certainly won't complain if the Vikings draft him.
I got tired of it during the Childress years.Funkytown wrote: I don't see you complaining regardless of who the Vikings pick. It's just not your style.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200000 ... uarterback"I would say in general, tape is worth about 85 percent of an overall grade, and the rest of the process is set up for red flags, and to go back and watch more tape to try to confirm what you saw or didn't see," Mayock said. "I saw about four of his tapes prior to the combine, and I really liked him. I thought he had a chance to be a franchise quarterback from what I saw on the tape. ... Except you've got to see the quarterbacks throw the ball live. I've never seen a top-level quarterback in the last 10 years have a bad pro day, until Teddy Bridgewater. He had no accuracy, the ball came out funny, the arm strength wasn't there, and it made me question everything I saw on tape because this was live.
"I went back and watched a bunch more tape and compared him to the rest of the guys in the draft," he said. "And like it or not, I've come to a conclusion -- if I was a GM in the NFL, I would not take him in the first round of the draft."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nf ... n/8172865/"Most teams feel the two top quarterbacks are Johnny Manziel and Blake Bortles. But there are other guys in that conversation, and I've heard 10 quarterbacks get grades of first, second or third round.''
--
Mayock notes that if he had to take one quarterback in this draft in the top 10, it would be Manziel.
--
"I think either one or two quarterbacks will go in the top eight,'' Mayock said. "That's at the most."
--
Mayock predicts a quarterback run beginning late in the first round and extending through the second.
If anything, it's the latter. NFL teams have scouts at NCAA games all season. They're paying attention.Demi wrote:Bridgewater goes from a top 5, to out of the top 10, after the last actual game is played.
Do NFL teams really just ignore the NCAA until a couple months after the season is over, or does the media just catch up then?
Interesting info. thanks!dead_poet wrote:Composite rankings of "experts": http://nesn.com/2014/04/jadeveon-clowne ... -rankings/
Some interesting things I found:
- Manziel ranks from 1-28
- If teams go BPA, based on this, no chance Mack gets to 8
- Donald went from previous average of 26 to 8
- Mosely ranked between 7-23
- Barr ranked between 8-30
- Fuller went from previous of average 48 overall to 27, Ward from 50-35, Beckham from 32 to 17
- Su'a-Filo ranked 22-44. Probably there at our R2 pick.
- Dennard still consensus #1 corner
- Nix has dropped quite a bit
- Kiper is bigger on Kelvin Benjamin, Kyle Van Noy, Derek Carr, Cody Latimer, Chris Borland than many and down on Anthony Barr, Ealy, Nix
I thought you'd like that.Mothman wrote:Look at Ward climb.
Why do you think he's "ready"?At this point, I'm with Kiper on Carr. Maybe he'll be an NFL bust but I think he's one of the most intriguing players in this draft. To me, he just seems ready to become an NFL QB.
Sorry, I should have been more specific.dead_poet wrote:Why do you think he's "ready"?
It's funny, other than perhaps "great arm" that analysis could have described the now-and-forever-He-Who-Shall-Remain-Nameless.Mothman wrote: Sorry, I should have been more specific.
I think any rookie is likely to need some work so I'm sure he'll need some too. I meant he seems "ready" mentally. The more I read about him, the more I love everything I hear about his "intangibles": experience, maturity, leadership, attitude (coachable, responsible, good work ethic, etc.). He strikes me as the kind of quarterback who has the confidence and personality to lead his team and the type a team responds to in a positive way, a player who will work hard to make the most of his opportunity.
Other than being a little shorter than optimal, he also seems to have what it takes physically: a great arm, quick release and good mobility. I'm hoping he's one of the QBs the Vikes are seriously considering.
Yes, it is... it's a search for the player with "the right stuff' and whatever that stuff is, it's elusive.dead_poet wrote:It's funny, other than perhaps "great arm" that analysis could have described the now-and-forever-He-Who-Shall-Remain-Nameless.
Such a crapshoot.
As you know I'm not the biggest Carr fan but he certainly does have an elite arm and it appears he has a good head on his shoulders. As for staying in school, I think he really had no choice. His mechanics were very poor in his junior season, particularly his footwork. That plus playing for Fresno St. (level of competition) probably kept his stock rather low. His brother being a bust probably didn't help, even if that's an unfair assessment to put on him.Mothman wrote: Yes, it is... it's a search for the player with "the right stuff' and whatever that stuff is, it's elusive.
Another thing I like about Carr is that he improved each season and that he stayed in school through his senior year (meaning he has the experience of being on the team for full seasons, three as a starter).
S197 wrote:As you know I'm not the biggest Carr fan but he certainly does have an elite arm and it appears he has a good head on his shoulders. As for staying in school, I think he really had no choice. His mechanics were very poor in his junior season, particularly his footwork. That plus playing for Fresno St. (level of competition) probably kept his stock rather low. His brother being a bust probably didn't help, even if that's an unfair assessment to put on him.
Your assessment of him is one of the only things keeping me from being more enthused about him.I saw him play at the beginning of his senior season and came away unimpressed. I do agree that he improved as the season went on, however. I find him intriguing because I think if he can get his mechanics down (it still needs a lot of work) and he can improve his poise under pressure, he has the traits to be very good. But taking everything into consideration, I don't think he's worth a 1st like some draft analysts predict. He would be a solid second round choice IMO. I would not trade up back into the 1st for him.