Yeah, but think of the entire package that we get with BortlesVikingLord wrote:With a move like this, the Vikings would get the most "NFL-looking" QB of this year's draft class. Not "NFL-looking" in terms of readiness or production, but literally in terms of how the guy looks. Standing at a solid 6'4" and weighing 230 pounds, Bortles is the kind of guy who walks into a room and makes scouts think "Now THERE is a freakin' QB prospect". Certainly, he has a strong arm to go with that big body, right? Umm, not really, it's pretty average. Then he must be really accurate, right? Um, not particularly. Lit the college football world on fire during his brief career, right? Ummm, no.
In my opinion, any GM who would trade *up* to get Bortles should have his head examined right after he's fired. In fact, he should be severely beaten, then fired, and then he can have his head examined.
I used to think Bortles was the second coming of Blaine Gabbert, and to some degree I still think that, although Bortles might turn out to be marginally better. But trading up to #2 to get him? No way. Even taking him at #8 would be foolish IMHO. QBs should not be drafted on whether they look the part, and while Bortles has perhaps more ideal physical stats than some of his contemporaries, I'd much rather the Vikes sit at #8 and take one of Bridgewater or Manziel (or even Murray who I think has the chance to be as good as anyone coming out this year) than Bortles.
 
 This has got to count for something right??




 
  And oh by the way Geno Smith put up very similar numbers playing on a legit football team playing a tougher schedule. In one game he put up 656 yards and 8 tds.  I kind of see why he was drafted in the first round and has been compared with Bridgewater (black, same size, and same types of throwing arms).
 And oh by the way Geno Smith put up very similar numbers playing on a legit football team playing a tougher schedule. In one game he put up 656 yards and 8 tds.  I kind of see why he was drafted in the first round and has been compared with Bridgewater (black, same size, and same types of throwing arms).  look at the schedule you just posted and see how it proves my point
  look at the schedule you just posted and see how it proves my point  115th 116th 90th dude you just shot yourself in the foot. Defensive opponent's rankings  with Manziel VS Bridgewater, huh Alabama #1 ranked defense in the country and LSU # 8 playing all major colleges.   I will give you the Florida win and truthfully I think that is why Bridgewater's stock soared. I would not call him going 20-32 and 2 tds exactly "lighting" anyone up though.
  115th 116th 90th dude you just shot yourself in the foot. Defensive opponent's rankings  with Manziel VS Bridgewater, huh Alabama #1 ranked defense in the country and LSU # 8 playing all major colleges.   I will give you the Florida win and truthfully I think that is why Bridgewater's stock soared. I would not call him going 20-32 and 2 tds exactly "lighting" anyone up though.
 I give up on trying to explain to you the difference of teams playing top notch teams every week and teams that play eachother in the lowly Big East  conference. For Alabama to be ranked the  #1 defense in the country , playing their tough schedule, should speak volumes about how good they are.
  I give up on trying to explain to you the difference of teams playing top notch teams every week and teams that play eachother in the lowly Big East  conference. For Alabama to be ranked the  #1 defense in the country , playing their tough schedule, should speak volumes about how good they are.   