Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Hunter Morrow
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5692
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
x 16

Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

Post by Hunter Morrow »

I know the refs want to keep a star out of people like Devin Hester him and didn't call a single illegal formation, holding or block in the back on the returns, but still.

249 yards?
User avatar
LA Viking
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1502
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:35 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

Post by LA Viking »

I don't recall any missed calls, just missed tackles and lanes and overpursuit.
The difference between men is not lack of strength, not lack of knowledge, but rather a lack of will.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

Post by Mothman »

This is an aspect of the game that really needs to be emphasized. Hunter pointed out that Hester had 249 yards on returns. Hester broke his own franchise record with that total and I think it's arguably the #1 reason the Vikings lost that game. There were breakdowns on defense, mistakes on offense, etc. but 249 yards indicates a massive amount of sacrificed field position. This 2013 Vikings defense has a lot of work to do but they sure weren't being helped by a special teams coverage unit that repeatedly but them in bad positions.

Jim
Last edited by Mothman on Tue Sep 17, 2013 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
mansquatch
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3836
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
x 117

Re: Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

Post by mansquatch »

I would argue that at least part of this was the condition of the field. Guys were slipping all day out there. When AP lost 13 yards in the Red Zone it was because he slipped after making a cut. I agree that 249 yards is atrocious and cannot happen again, but I saw replays and guys were slipping all over the place trying to get to him. Sunday was just about the perfect storm for Hester, sloppy field and his being quite perturbed with his organization.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
beardedterror
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:41 am

Re: Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

Post by beardedterror »

mansquatch wrote:When AP lost 13 yards in the Red Zone it was because he slipped after making a cut.
No, it was because he ran backwards 13 yards. Boneheaded move from a usually smart runner.
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

Post by Eli »

My take is that a kick returner has a big advantage on a wet field like that, and we saw it on both sides. The kicker can't get the ball as deep due to the poor footing and a damp ball, making returns much more likely to begin with. On the return, the returner is running downhill, making small cuts at high speed, whereas the coverage team has to stop and cut more severely. Kick returners always make use of small seams in the coverage, but on a wet track those seams close much more slowly.
User avatar
Thaumaturgist
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 917
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 7:29 am
x 86
Contact:

Re: Our shocking lack of coverage on special teams

Post by Thaumaturgist »

As much as I hated seeing Hester with the run backs, it was a refreshing change from the boring kick it out of the back of the end zone that we're so used to seeing these days.

Who couldn't ask for a more exciting way to start the game?
Post Reply