PacificNorseWest wrote: Ponder didn't even see 90% of the open guys.

Moderator: Moderators
PacificNorseWest wrote: Ponder didn't even see 90% of the open guys.
My comment isn't based on today's performance but I'll agree that it's an unfair generalization because of the way I phrased it. What I really meant was that some fans feel that way and I don't think that's unfair at all. I'm tired of ALL of this so I won't go into detail but suffice to say that I'm referring to the electron microscope of criticism Ponder has been under for 2 years now. There's a level of criticism that is fair and justified and there's a level at which people are just piling on and being unrealistic. I'm talking about the latter extreme and I know you've seen that stuff around here.J. Kapp 11 wrote: Jim, I hate to say it, but given today's performance by Ponder, your comment is pretty unfair.
I understand it already and I'm not defending his performance today except to say that it wasn't 100% bad and I mean that in the most literal sense. There are people who want to suggest otherwise.Yes, we want him to be better. I, for one, would accept almost any degree of better. But the brutal reality of today ... he wasn't. Not even close. Honestly, he was pretty horrible.
When you see the replay, you'll understand what we're talking about.
As the leader of the Ponder lynch mob...there's a reason. You had FSU fans after the draft telling us he's not NFL material. You watch him at FSU and he wasn't a very good QB. You saw repeatedly, preseason, regular season, heard about practices, that the guy doesn't have it. And you watch games and see it. And still there are fans who say "give him more time". Spielman and the Vikings say "3 years!" you don't need 3 years! It was clear from day one! And they didn't even try to have a backup plan. And then this year they just grab the best veteran available. No QB drafted the entire team since he was drafted. No real undrafted free agents. They just give him it. Same thing happened with Jackson before this. Why do we keep screwing with this position? Some fans (myself) are damn sick and tired of it. Childress came in and jerked around Culpepper. Half assed it the entire time. He's gone, and we do it again. It's maddening. And keeps happening!!!There's a level of criticism that is fair and justified and there's a level at which people are just piling on and being unrealistic. I'm talking about the latter extreme and I know you've seen that stuff around here.
His completion percentage is what it is. You can try and rationalize that it should be lower, but that does not change the fact that he is able to hit receivers in the short and medium range. I don't care if they are easy throws or not. Completion percentage has absolutely nothing to do with measuring difficulty of the throw. He throws an absolutely horrible and inaccurate long ball.allday1991 wrote:
If you read a few post up you will see why his passing completion Is higher than it should be, did you watch this offence last year? Our best passing play was a screen like dump to Harvin ....so hard to complete. My prove of him not going through his reads is in the information of another person seeing what I see so therefor backing up my point, notice I didn't have to use words like "I think' he goes through his reads like you did.
He doesn't belong as the starting quarterback of an NFL team. Whether he is 100% bad or 97% bad or 99% bad is really not the issue.Mothman wrote:
I understand it already and I'm not defending his performance today except to say that it wasn't 100% bad and I mean that in the most literal sense. There are people who want to suggest otherwise.
Watch the play again with Wright running a hitch that is almost a pick six the other way but lucky the lion defender dropped the ball. Watch Ponders head as he stairs down Wright the whole play and doesn't move his head side to side, what more proof do you want that he doesn't go through his progressions. Its easy enough to see when a guy in the pocket is moving his head around and going through progressions, if he looks one way then runs that isn't going through your progression not hard to see.BGM wrote: His completion percentage is what it is. You can try and rationalize that it should be lower, but that does not change the fact that he is able to hit receivers in the short and medium range. I don't care if they are easy throws or not. Completion percentage has absolutely nothing to do with measuring difficulty of the throw. He throws an absolutely horrible and inaccurate long ball.
Notice I use words like "I think" because I am expressing MY OPINION. Much as you are expressing yours. You are not an NFL coach nor an NFL player, I assume, so unless you have some other access to game film, your "proof" is simply hearsay. Has he missed open players, undoubtedly. Is that a result of not moving through his progressions, or his field vision? THAT is arguable.
I contend he goes through his check downs and simply does not see the open guy in real time. I could be wrong. You claim he does not check down and always goes to the primary receiver. I just don't see that, but you seem to be firmly convinced of that.
Do you actually understand the term confirmation bias?
To be honest, I no longer even care what the issue is regarding Ponder because I'm tired of talking about all of it. I need a break from the irrational, unreasonable posts that have gradually started to dominate this board and drown out the reasonable voices that used to be the majority. The Vikings could cut Ponder tomorrow and it wouldn't bother me if they had a replacement that made sense. I'd feel bad for the guy but really, he's not even the issue for me anymore. It's the way this board is barreling straight toward the same fate as the old Vikings newsgroup. It was created as a haven from the kind of nonsense that ruined that place. Now it's mired in it.DanAS wrote: He doesn't belong as the starting quarterback of an NFL team. Whether he is 100% bad or 97% bad or 99% bad is really not the issue.
We want a winning competitive team, Ponder isn't getting it done, I don't see what's so unreasonable or irrational.Mothman wrote: To be honest, I no longer even care what the issue is regarding Ponder because I'm tired of talking about all of it. I need a break from the irrational, unreasonable posts that have gradually started to dominate this board and drown out the reasonable voices that used to be the majority. The Vikings could cut Ponder tomorrow and it wouldn't bother me if they had a replacement that made sense. I'd feel bad for the guy but really, he's not even the issue for me anymore. It's the way this board is barreling straight toward the same fate as the old Vikings newsgroup. It was created as a haven from the kind of nonsense that ruined that place. Now it's mired in it.
Move along then. No one is forcing you to watch.DanAS wrote:
The issue is that we have better things to do with our lives than watch this guy play football.
That's the attitude.PacificNorseWest wrote: Move along then. No one is forcing you to watch.
No it wasn't. That's EXACTLY where you throw it. Right where only the receiver can catch it. ESPECIALLY in man-to-man coverage. He was draped. That is supposed to have been learned in practice. Pure timing and it was there, but Simpson couldn't catch. Period.PurpleKoolaid wrote:The first pic was a poor throw as well. That's why it was tipped. It was a timing slant and well, that's what happens when the ball is poorly thrown.