He is a puzzle, but by January we should be able to have a better grasp on whether he's the quarterback of the future
Or
I have no fuc*ing clue

Moderator: Moderators
That's basically what I just chose. I picked "He is still a puzzle, and by Jan there will still be no consensus on Ponder as our franchise QB" because I can't imagine there will be a consensus but I prefer the way you phrased it. "He is still a puzzle" alone would have been ideal because that sums up my view of him very accurately!dead_poet wrote:How about the option:
He is a puzzle, but by January we should be able to have a better grasp on whether he's the quarterback of the future
GBFavreFan wrote:yes it is that time again .... We exceeded all expectations and won 10 games, entered the playoffs, had an historic season with Adrian Peterson, and our team is the home of the reigning MVP and therefore best player in the NFL. We had some great breakout play from Harrison Smith, and others, we had an exciting offseason with some great rookie and veteran additions. And we enter the new season with a possibly deteriorating Packer squad, a hard to read Bears group, and a Lions team seemingly on a perennial treadmill. All under the roaming gaze of the two big lions of the NFC the 49ers and Seahawks.
And we enter this jungle with Christian Ponder as our QB. We've had an offseason of training camp, roster changes, deep reflection, and three weeks of preseason with CP as the starter. As we are about to enter the 2013-2014 season, how do you feel about Christian Ponder as the Vikings starting QB?
Why is it that when it comes to Ponder, poor performance by the offensive line or the receivers is never a reason, it's always an excuse?GBFavreFan wrote:We're into year three and whenever anyone pointed out how Ponder seems to be lacking the overall ability to be a good QB, we've been bombarded with a whole host of excuses mainly being patience to give Ponder more time, or blaming the offensive line and/or receivers. Well we're getting to the end of the line for those excuses.
Okay, I won't because I don't think it's true that he showed "nothing" when his protection was solid. He made some good throws in the preseason and some bad ones. He and most of his offensive teammates were very inconsistent.Don't use the line as an excuse because they didn't blow coverage in every single play and Ponder showed nothing when his protection was solid.
I don't expect a sudden transformation from any player but (and I know you don't want to hear this) preseason games are pretty meaningless as an accurate indication of regular season performance. You're right that Ponder hasn't earned the benefit of the doubt an established player would get but that doesn't make his performance in meaningless games any more meaningful. It just makes fans more unforgiving. Preseason games are meaningless because of the nature of the preseason itself. The approach to the games is very different from the regular season. The preparation is different, the playcalling is different, the goals of the coaches and teams are different. It's just not like regular season football.If Ponder played solid all year long, I would disregard his preseason performance, but even Blaine Gabbert knew he couldn't wait until Week 1 to start reminding people why he was drafted #1. For a guy who has so much to prove, Ponder played like a guy who is no different from the guy who dragged down the Vikings last year, before Adrian pulled us back up. Does anyone honestly expect Ponder to suddenly transform into playing well once the regular season starts as if CP doesn't try unless the games count? Even old man Peyton Manning gave it 100% to prepare for the regular season last week.
Mothman wrote:I picked "He is still a puzzle, and by Jan there will still be no consensus on Ponder as our franchise QB" because I can't imagine there will be a consensus
Well said. That's how I feel about it too. I want Ponder to work out because the Vikes need a legitimate QB and it would obviously be better if they didn't have to go back to square one and start the development process all over again with another player. I'm not confident Ponder will work out but I'm glad they're trying to develop a starter instead of just putting band-aids over the problem like they did during the majority of the Green and Childress eras. It's the right approach. Hopefully, Ponder's not the wrong player.VikeMike wrote:I voted that Ponder is puzzle, but we'll know by January. I'm afraid that I suspect I know how this will turn out, and that I'm right about those suspicions. I don't think Ponder will develop into an effective, consistent NFL starter. I hope my suspicions are wrong, because it's back to square one yet again. I also don't care if it is Ponder or someone else who becomes a legitimate QB for the Vikings. I just want someone to do it. I would prefer Ponder only because it is the most expedient way.
LOL! Come on, man. It's okay to cry.The Breeze wrote:I find your question to be a bit personal....my feelings are my feelings, Buddy.