Mothman wrote:
It might count if he was playing alone.
What is so hard to grasp about the idea that in a sport where each team has 22 starters and more players than that involved, one player is never solely responsible for a loss? Why even try to fight that obvious fact? Isn't it enough for people to acknowledge that Ponder's performance in that game was a huge reason for the loss? What's the point of trying to hold him solely responsible?
The Vikings allowed 23 points in that game and GB had an 11 minute scoring drive to begin the 4th quarter. Walsh missed a 42 yard field goal with just over 2 minutes left. Those were factors in the loss too.
I think it's human nature.....although I'm more of the opinion that it's really a learned behavior. It's just like when people blame the president for the price of gas, or government for the fact that they lack the ability to govern themselves. We are(many of us) even encouraged, from an early age, to put accountability for our very lives on the shoulders of someone else.
And in team sports there are positions that have an unequal amount of influence on the out come of games. Pitchers and catchers, QBs, FG kicker etc.....it plays right into the psyche of blame. A guy is either hero getting too much credit or a bum with too much blame. It's appears to be one of the corner stones of fanaticism. Our society is often fanatical.....