I don't have anything particularly creative to offer in terms of creating mismatches. I'll leave that to Musgrave.

Jim
Moderator: Moderators
They have to find that outside threat, otherwise they'll remain too easy to defend. I use that word loosely since AD obviously wasn't easy to defend last season but as much as I like him and as much as he brings to the offense, the Vikings are only going to get so many points per game out of their running game. Their perimeter offense was practically non-existent most of last season. Rudolph's a good TE but he has not shown much ability to get separation and consequently, will only draw so much attention on seams and other intermediate-to-deep routes. Harvin's a terrific weapon but to some extent, his touches need to be manufactured and he's much more effective in the short-to-medium range. Bringing an extra defender into the box helps defend against Peterson, Harvin and Rudolph, which is why it's so crucial for the Vikings to on the outside. If they can do that it should open up the middle and make it much easier for those 3 playmakers. If they can't, teams will continue to feel too comfortable focusing on the middle and bringing an extra defender up into the box.PurpleMustReign wrote:Harvin and AD in the same backfield would be BEAST.
But if we sign a legit outside threat (heck even a healthy Simpson) it could do wonders for this offense.
I wonder how much of the lack of an "outside" threat is scheme? I mean, it really seems like on the majority of plays the Vikings offense is in pretty tight and Musgrave seems to like it that way. I don't know if the bunched alignments make it easier to conceal whether the play is a run or a pass, or easier to block as there are more offensive players in tight, but it sure seems like a high percentage of offensive snaps come in tightly-bunched alignments, which are necessarily going to be harder to go deep on, at least with the sort of fly patterns that are most often associated with "outside" threats.Mothman wrote: They have to find that outside threat, otherwise they'll remain too easy to defend. I use that word loosely since AD obviously wasn't easy to defend last season but as much as I like him and as much as he brings to the offense, the Vikings are only going to get so many points per game out of their running game. Their perimeter offense was practically non-existent most of last season. Rudolph's a good TE but he has not shown much ability to get separation and consequently, will only draw so much attention on seams and other intermediate-to-deep routes. Harvin's a terrific weapon but to some extent, his touches need to be manufactured and he's much more effective in the short-to-medium range. Bringing an extra defender into the box helps defend against Peterson, Harvin and Rudolph, which is why it's so crucial for the Vikings to on the outside. If they can do that it should open up the middle and make it much easier for those 3 playmakers. If they can't, teams will continue to feel too comfortable focusing on the middle and bringing an extra defender up into the box.
That's my take anyway...
Join a midget league?fiestavike wrote:If we end up keeping Harvin this year, does anyone have any creative ideas for getting both Harvin and Wright on the field at the same time?
Personally, I suspect the lack of talent on the outside had a substantial influence on the play design and playcalling.VikingLord wrote:I wonder how much of the lack of an "outside" threat is scheme? I mean, it really seems like on the majority of plays the Vikings offense is in pretty tight and Musgrave seems to like it that way. I don't know if the bunched alignments make it easier to conceal whether the play is a run or a pass, or easier to block as there are more offensive players in tight, but it sure seems like a high percentage of offensive snaps come in tightly-bunched alignments, which are necessarily going to be harder to go deep on, at least with the sort of fly patterns that are most often associated with "outside" threats.
Agreed but either type of receiver is an outside threat and outside threat doesn't necessarily mean deep threat.I think the real question here is not whether the Vikes look at an outside speedster at WR, but whether what they lack is the sort of bigger, ball control type of WR who has an excellent vertical and wins a majority of his share of jump balls. That's not necessarily the same thing as a guy who can blaze down the field and beat coverage deep.
I don't see the consistency, although Wright made a few nice plays deep. Personally, I don't think it's a strength at all for Harvin, which isn't to say he can't get open or make some plays down the field. I just don't see either player as an exceptional deep threat at this point. I'd call them average deep threats in NFL terms but "average" is more than we got from the other Vikings WRs as deep threats last season.In fact, between Wright and Harvin I'd say they already have 2 guys who can get open deep consistently and who are threats in that aspect of the game.
It might be, although I still think they would be better off with 2 bigger receivers on the outside, even if one is a true deep threat and the other is a big-bodied possession receiver. I like Wright's game but I don't think the Vikes should just settle for him as one of their starting outside starters. Right now, I see him as a player that should be in the mix to start at WR, not as a definitive answer at the flanker position.I guess the point is, if the Vikes need a bigger, ball-control type at WR (which I think is the real need, not a "deep threat"), then a guy like Justin Hunter makes perfect sense, and they can probably snag him with their 2nd rounder. Hunter not only has size, but he's actually a decent runner as well (I think he clocked 4.41 at the Combine), so that might be the right guy to solve the "outside threat" problem.
I'd rather just put Ellison out there to do that. He'd get a better block than Percy, who's a little undersized for the job.fiestavike wrote:Can you guys see any benefit to sliding Rudolph off tackle and putting PH, JW, or both in the slot beside him? I could see Percy being very effective "pulling" on sweep plays and power running plays to his side of the field in such a scenario. JW and KR ought to be able to double team the OLB or DE to seal the edge. I don't know, I'm just trying to come up with something, especially if we don't have a prototypical #1 WR.
I don't think it's just a question of long passes or downfield ability. That's part of it but the main issue is the outside threat and I mean that literally: a threat to make plays that lines up on the outside, a player that represents a mismatch in single coverage, a player who can draw attention away from the inside where Harvin's in the slot, Rudolph is lined up at TE and Peterson is running. Sure, Harvin is capable of making catches on the outside but that doesn't address the problem because Harvin doesn't play outside most of the time, he plays in the slot. Simpson and Jenkins weren't worrying anyone and Wright was only effective periodically. They need someone outside who beats single coverage on a much more regular basis and consequently, forces defenses to make tougher choices. That's not Rudolph or Harvin. It may be Wright but it's definitely not yet.mansquatch wrote:I think the lack of outside passing game in the first half of the season had as much to do with Ponder as it did with the likes of Jenkins. Harvin is very capable of getting the ball on the outside, we saw him get the deep ball early on, just not very often. JW is showing flashes of the downfield ability. Both are players that are shifty, but also have legit speed. Neither is very tall. My point here is that if late 2012 season Ponder is throwing the ball we’ll see more downfield throws from the get go. I think the lack of long passes to PH was by design due to his open field ability, but also due to concerns about Ponder. We saw more of those stretch plays in the last part of the season and they were some of the best balls we’ve seen out of Ponder. I think that this “leash” will be looser in 2013 unless Ponder goes Mr. Hyde on us again.
They were all healthy at the same time, just not for long. Ponder's slump began a few weeks before Harvin was injured and Peterson posted 3 consecutive 100+ yard rushing performances in Harvin's last 3 games of the season.I’ve made this point before, but the timing of the injury to PH came at the start of CP’s slump. By the time Ponder righted his ship, PH was on IR. Likewise, AP really didn’t go into Beast mode until the last 8 games. The point here is that we haven’t seen what this offense can do when all the critical pieces are healthy because they were not all healthy at the same time.
It's not the _main_ issue, unless you take it for granted that the Vikings operate a run-first offense because they want to. They currently are run-first, but that's only because they've been forced into that uncomfortable situation, having little talent at either QB or WR. In 2009 they certainly weren't a run-first team, and I don't imagine many teams in 2013 would elect to be.Mothman wrote:It's not just a question of long passes or downfield ability. That's part of it but the main issue is the outside threat and I mean that literally: a threat to make plays that lines up on the outside, a player that represents a mismatch in single coverage, a player who can draw attention away from the inside where Harvin's in the slot, Rudolph is lined up at TE and Peterson is running.
I think they want to have a balanced offense with a strong running game at it's core and the main ingredient they're lacking to achieve that balance is arguably an outside threat. It would certainly help them get closer to a more balanced attack. That's taking Ponder out of the discussion, of course, but we know he's the incumbent starter and there's no indication that will change...Eli wrote:It's not the _main_ issue, unless you take it for granted that the Vikings operate a run-first offense because they want to. They currently are run-first, but that's only because they've been forced into that uncomfortable situation, having little talent at either QB or WR. In 2009 they certainly weren't a run-first team, and I don't imagine many teams in 2013 would elect to be.
My guess is the Vikings are going to do exactly what you're suggesting. I think they'll take a shot at getting a more balanced offense by acquiring a Wide Receiver from the draft that can get deep and also make big catches anywhere on the field. In fact, I'm thinking the Vikings might even draft two WRs in an effort to give their receiving corps a booster shot of talent.Mothman wrote: I think they want to have a balanced offense with a strong running game at it's core and the main ingredient they're lacking to achieve that balance is arguably an outside threat. It would certainly help them get closer to a more balanced attack. That's taking Ponder out of the discussion, of course, but we know he's the incumbent starter and there's no indication that will change...