
Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
I have got to agree that if I had a choice I would have a bigger QB. Thank God the Vikes have a 6-2 230 lb. QB that runs a 4.6 forty and is a good scrambler. 

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
-
- Franchise Player
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 pm
- Location: St.Francis Minnesota
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Oh id rather have a stereotypical 6'4 230 QB than a 5'10 QB but thats not what you look into you dont just go hes tall so he must have a chance or hes short so he has no chance. Linemen dont stand stiff as a board they are usually crouched trying to get lower than others so I mean just because a Lineman is 6'6 in reality the Qb could probably still see over him even if the QB is 5'11Demi wrote: One ring, and not a single one left in the playoffs.![]()
This isn't the Twilight Zone, RGIII and Russell Wilson are not going to win a super bowl. Ever. Book it Danno!
Obviously they *can* have success...I'd just rather take my chances on a guy who can stand tall in the pocket and manage to see over his linemen without having to find lanes between them! Or a release point a few inches higher!
If I was to ask you right now, would you rather have a 5'11 quarterback, or a 6'4 quarterback which would you choose? Everything else being equal? Quarterbacks are a complete crap shoot regardless of everything involved, if I can increase my odds, no matter how tiny of a difference it makes, I'm going too!
The term fan comes from FANatic or fanatical.
-
- Franchise Player
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 pm
- Location: St.Francis Minnesota
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Steve Young 6'2
Brett Favre 6'2
Joe Montana 6'2
Drew Brees 6'0
Aaron Rodgers 6'2
Just saying there are plenty good quarterbacks who are shorter I think they all have also won a ring
Brett Favre 6'2
Joe Montana 6'2
Drew Brees 6'0
Aaron Rodgers 6'2
Just saying there are plenty good quarterbacks who are shorter I think they all have also won a ring

The term fan comes from FANatic or fanatical.
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
I think most NFL teams would too but height can't become THE determining factor in whether a QB should be drafted or not. That's too extreme. Would you really want the Vikes to pass up on the next Brees or Rodgers because they weren't 6' 4"?Demi wrote: One ring, and not a single one left in the playoffs.![]()
This isn't the Twilight Zone, RGIII and Russell Wilson are not going to win a super bowl. Ever. Book it Danno!
Obviously they *can* have success...I'd just rather take my chances on a guy who can stand tall in the pocket and manage to see over his linemen without having to find lanes between them! Or a release point a few inches higher!
A team increases their odds of success by drafting the QB with best overall combination of size, skill, productivity, decision-making, demonstrated leadership, athleticism, etc., not by passing on a potentially great QB because he's a little too short. Admittedly, a 5' 11" QB needs to really be able to make up for his far less than ideal height by being strong in other areas but you apply this same logic to 6' 2" QBs and that's where it really gets silly. Once you've admitted that such QBs can have success, height is no longer a legitimate reason to pass on them in the draft.If I was to ask you right now, would you rather have a 5'11 quarterback, or a 6'4 quarterback which would you choose? Everything else being equal? Quarterbacks are a complete crap shoot regardless of everything involved, if I can increase my odds, no matter how tiny of a difference it makes, I'm going too!
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Yes, he would. Demi's team wouldn't have a player under 6' tall (only cornerbacks and kickers would be allowed under 6' 2") and they'd all run 4.4 40s, have bright white teeth and gleaming hair. He could lay out his entire draft board based on combine results and 8x10" photos of the players.Mothman wrote:I think most NFL teams would too but height can't become THE determining factor in whether a QB should be drafted or not. That's too extreme. Would you really want the Vikes to pass up on the next Brees or Rodgers because they weren't 6' 4"?
Or you draft them in the middle to late rounds and cross your fingers hoping you've lucked out a little and found a diamond. Like the Seahawks did. Nobody drafts a QB in the third round expecting him to be a franchise quarterback. You take a chance on him, hoping he makes the team and some day becomes productive.A team increases their odds of success by drafting the QB with best overall combination of size, skill, productivity, decision-making, demonstrated leadership, athleticism, etc., not by passing on a potentially great QB because he's a little too short. Admittedly, a 5' 11" QB needs to really be able to make up for his far less than ideal height by being strong in other areas but you apply this same logic to 6' 2" QBs and that's where it really gets silly. Once you've admitted that such QBs can have success, height is no longer a legitimate reason to pass on them in the draft.
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Well said. In Wilson's case, I think Seattle took a very wise, calculated risk on a player who was available in the third round because of his height. Based on his performance and production as a college player (particularly in his senior season at Wisconsin) Wilson would likely have been a first round pick if he was taller. He might have even been a top 15 pick. He perfectly illustrates why it's a mistake to over-emphasize a single characteristic.Eli wrote:Or you draft them in the middle to late rounds and cross your fingers hoping you've lucked out a little and found a diamond. Like the Seahawks did. Nobody drafts a QB in the third round expecting him to be a franchise quarterback. You take a chance on him, hoping he makes the team and some day becomes productive.
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Exactly. It's always a mistake to underestimate actual on-field experience and performance. I mean, Wilson was nothing less than a stud QB in college and played against some of the best competition in the nation, not to mention he broke a FBS record for passing efficiency.Mothman wrote: Well said. In Wilson's case, I think Seattle took a very wise, calculated risk on a player who was available in the third round because of his height. Based on his performance and production as a college player (particularly in his senior season at Wisconsin) Wilson would likely have been a first round pick if he was taller. He might have even been a top 15 pick. He perfectly illustrates why it's a mistake to over-emphasize a single characteristic.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Hey Squatch, I could probably find Sherman and Mr. Peabody and borrow their wayback machine.mansquatch wrote:What exactly does this hindignt is 20/20 discussion have to do with the off-sesaon direction of the Vikings? You don't like the Ponder pick. Well boo-hoo, until somebody invents a wayback machine we are all going to have to deal with the fact that barring injury he'll be the starter in September.
The NT aspect of this thread is of interest. I think getting a solid playmaker at NT and MLB would do much to improve our defense. Are there any FA or Draft prospects that could be the next Vince Wilfork or Pat Williams for this club?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpgJzlY9y8A
Last edited by Purple bruise on Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1618
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:24 am
- Location: south minneapolis
- x 20
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Would I be correct, Purple bruise, that you are a "man of a certain age"?Purple bruise wrote: Hey Squatch, I could probably find Sherman and Mr. Peabody and borrow their wayback machine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpgJzlY9y8A
"My anterior orifice is forever causing me extreme difficulty;
therefore, I shall endeavor to acquire some self-control."
therefore, I shall endeavor to acquire some self-control."
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Well I was not watching the original ones but I watched a lot of old reruns.PsyDanny wrote: Would I be correct, Purple bruise, that you are a "man of a certain age"?

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
I admire your certainty. But your argument here is uninformed. Ponder, Wilson, and RG III all unexpectedly brought young teams into the playoffs in 2013. Odds are far greater that one of the three wins the show despite your fierce certainty they will not.Demi wrote:This isn't the Twilight Zone, RGIII and Russell Wilson are not going to win a super bowl. Ever. Book it Danno!
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
IMO odds are greater two of those teams don't even make the playoffs next year...CalVike wrote: I admire your certainty. But your argument here is uninformed. Ponder, Wilson, and RG III all unexpectedly brought young teams into the playoffs in 2013. Odds are far greater that one of the three wins the show despite your fierce certainty they will not.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
- Location: Coon Rapids, MN
- x 117
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
More likely a certaintly. I doubt RG3 plays much in 2013 after that injury, WSH is not much without him.Demi wrote: IMO odds are greater two of those teams don't even make the playoffs next year...
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
http://vikingsmessageboard.com/viewtopi ... =1&t=25446Boon wrote:According to nfl.com jets might be trading revis. Thoughts?
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Ha! It's late. Whoops.Boon wrote: Funny, thats a thread about free agents
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly