Happy Anniversary, Minnesota!

Run into some old friends from another group or board? Want to do a little schmoozing, talk over old times? Or just some off topic stuff, then this is the place.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
DeeEss57
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1281
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Zenith City of the Inland Seas

Happy Anniversary, Minnesota!

Post by DeeEss57 »

On May 11, 1858, Minnesota became the 32nd state in the union after Congress finally approved its application for statehood.

Go here
http://www.mn150years.org/home.html to learn more about the celebration.


Dawn
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

wow

Post by jackal »

Im kinda surprised it wasn't an earlier state
than 32 to be honest.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
User avatar
DeeEss57
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1281
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Zenith City of the Inland Seas

Re: wow

Post by DeeEss57 »

jackal wrote:Im kinda surprised it wasn't an earlier state
than 32 to be honest.
I think it was because of issues with boundaries and the shape of the state. Should it be an east-west state? Or a north-south state? There was much debate about the shape of the state-to-be.

The east-west proponents wanted the northern border to be at the 46th parallel, the 45th and 30 minutes, or the 45th and 15 minutes. The western border of the east-west state would have been the Missouri River.
The northern half of the Minnesota Territory (including the Iron Range and the port of Duluth) would become another state, and the east-west state of Minnesota would have become a farming state.

The north-south proponents wanted the western border to be the Red River and the southern border to be the Iowa border. Due to decisive action by Henry Rice, these are the borders that the US Congress approved.

It's interesting to note that Minnesota was the first state in eight years to be admitted to the union, following Iowa by twelve years, Wisconsin by ten, and California by eight years. The Dakotas wouldn't be admitted to the union until 31 (!) years after Minnesota.

Did you know that Minnesota actually had two constitutions? One was written on white paper and was signed only by the Republican delegates and one on blue paper signed only by the Democratic delegates to the constitutional convention.

Ah, the drama of politics!



Dawn
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Post by PurpleMustReign »

I thought Minnesota had been looking a little grayer lately... :lol:

It is cool. I'll be 79 when MN turns 200, hopefully I'll be arounbd to see that too.
User avatar
Minniman
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7417
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 10:07 am
Location: Vikingland Minnesota

Post by Minniman »

It's interesting to note that Minnesota was the first state in eight years to be admitted to the union, following Iowa by twelve years, Wisconsin by ten, and California by eight years. The Dakotas wouldn't be admitted to the union until 31 (!) years after Minnesota.
Why the Dakota Territory was allowed to become two states is beyond me.

At least Minnesota can still claim that it is the northern-most state of the contiguous 48 states.
We come from the land of the ice and snow .... :smilevike:
User avatar
DeeEss57
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1281
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Zenith City of the Inland Seas

Post by DeeEss57 »

Minniman wrote:Why the Dakota Territory was allowed to become two states is beyond me.
It actually became three states because Montana was part of the Dakota Territory. Montana was admitted to the union six days after the Dakotas.

And the reason the Dakotas are east-west states is because of the railroads. The railroads went east-west, so settlement went the same direction, causing the northern and southern parts of the territory to have little contact with each other.

I love history!




Dawn
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

mmm

Post by jackal »

I know the California ballot has had an issue
of making California into three or two states. There
is no way it will go anywhere though. LA won't wan't get
lose the water rights IMO.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Post Reply