Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:07 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
- x 59
Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
I am curious what everyone thinks of the state of the other teams in the NFC and who you see competing for the NFCC and who you see being a nonfactor this upcoming season. As Paul Allen says this is the offseason and you have a right to change your opinion in September.
Watching the latest season of All or Nothing you can see what an impact injuries (and suspensions) have on a team. The Cowboys were without Zeke, Left Tackle, and Sean Lee much of the season and eeked out just above .500. I have not heard much noise about them this off-season, but I think the Cowboys could be poised to surprise this year (like they did two seasons ago). I think jettisoning Dez will also help them improve. I see them making the playoffs and advancing at least to the divisional round. This pains me to say as the Cowboys compete with the Packers as my most disliked teams.
Conversely, I think the Rams are poised for a sophomore slump with McVay. No doubt they improved their roster on paper this offseason, but now the pressure is on and it is a big question mark as to wether or not these big names can gel. Football is the ultimate team sport. Also, other coaches now have a year of tape on McVay as head coach which may help defensive coordinators catch up.
Not surprisingly, I think the road of the NFC will run through the Eagles. No significant drop offs, a young team and they get Wentz back. It’s hard to repeat (especially considering the parody in the NFL, specifically the NFC) but they are the undeniable team to beat in my opinion.
To put a finer point on this, here are my NFC Predictions:
NFC East Champ: Eagles
NFC North Champ: Vikings
NFC South Champ: Saints
NFC West Champ: Rams (least competitive division)
NFC Wild Card 1: Cowboys
NFC Wild Card 2: Falcons
This would mean that the Packers miss the playoffs two years in a row. I am sure many will say this is unlikely with Rogers in back. Last year did expose some glaring weaknesses, though. If the Packers get in, I think it is because the NFC South beats each other up enough that the second place team misses the wild card.
What do you think?!
Watching the latest season of All or Nothing you can see what an impact injuries (and suspensions) have on a team. The Cowboys were without Zeke, Left Tackle, and Sean Lee much of the season and eeked out just above .500. I have not heard much noise about them this off-season, but I think the Cowboys could be poised to surprise this year (like they did two seasons ago). I think jettisoning Dez will also help them improve. I see them making the playoffs and advancing at least to the divisional round. This pains me to say as the Cowboys compete with the Packers as my most disliked teams.
Conversely, I think the Rams are poised for a sophomore slump with McVay. No doubt they improved their roster on paper this offseason, but now the pressure is on and it is a big question mark as to wether or not these big names can gel. Football is the ultimate team sport. Also, other coaches now have a year of tape on McVay as head coach which may help defensive coordinators catch up.
Not surprisingly, I think the road of the NFC will run through the Eagles. No significant drop offs, a young team and they get Wentz back. It’s hard to repeat (especially considering the parody in the NFL, specifically the NFC) but they are the undeniable team to beat in my opinion.
To put a finer point on this, here are my NFC Predictions:
NFC East Champ: Eagles
NFC North Champ: Vikings
NFC South Champ: Saints
NFC West Champ: Rams (least competitive division)
NFC Wild Card 1: Cowboys
NFC Wild Card 2: Falcons
This would mean that the Packers miss the playoffs two years in a row. I am sure many will say this is unlikely with Rogers in back. Last year did expose some glaring weaknesses, though. If the Packers get in, I think it is because the NFC South beats each other up enough that the second place team misses the wild card.
What do you think?!
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
- Location: Coon Rapids, MN
- x 117
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
I would keep in mind that all three of the top NFC teams: Eagles, Vikings, and Rams played fluffy schedules last year. Of the three we probably had the toughest road, playing the NFC S. I agree on the Rams as being poised for a slump, but I think it has more to do with Goff and a 1st place schedule.
Larger point isn't to diminish what each team did, but to point out that this year they will all be playing 1st place schedules and dealing with the NFL meat grinder. Momentum can really matter in the NFL, as such I predict at least one of these teams will not be back in the post season and that assumes they stay healthy.
Larger point isn't to diminish what each team did, but to point out that this year they will all be playing 1st place schedules and dealing with the NFL meat grinder. Momentum can really matter in the NFL, as such I predict at least one of these teams will not be back in the post season and that assumes they stay healthy.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
I think it ends up like below. I think the Saints don't make it this year.
NFC East Champ: Eagles
NFC North Champ: Vikings
NFC South Champ: Falcons
NFC West Champ: Seahawks
NFC Wild Card 1: Rams
NFC Wild Card 2: Packers
NFC East Champ: Eagles
NFC North Champ: Vikings
NFC South Champ: Falcons
NFC West Champ: Seahawks
NFC Wild Card 1: Rams
NFC Wild Card 2: Packers
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:07 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
- x 59
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:07 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
- x 59
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
I agree this is a big factor. Your statement about momentum is what worries me about our first 5 games. All of them are tough and it’s important to get off on decent footing!mansquatch wrote: ↑Mon Jul 16, 2018 10:46 am Larger point isn't to diminish what each team did, but to point out that this year they will all be playing 1st place schedules and dealing with the NFL meat grinder. Momentum can really matter in the NFL, as such I predict at least one of these teams will not be back in the post season and that assumes they stay healthy.
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 8:38 pm
- x 1
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
It is murder's row the first 5 weeks for sure. But I like its at the start where defenses generally are closer to mid-season form than the offenses. I think a general defensive advantage is multiplied by our team D and familiarity with system and each other to start out in late season form and tip scales our way early.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
- Location: Coon Rapids, MN
- x 117
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
Our veteran defense is certainly an early season advantage when offenses are less crisp. I think facing Green Bay early is helpful in this regard also. Obviously this assumes we stay healthy.
In general by week 6 we'll have an idea of who is who. There will likely be a team playing a soft schedule that cranks out wins, there almost always seems to be one. (SF seems like a likely candidate this season) The usual vet teams with great QB play will also likely be winning games. (Ironically the last few seasons GB has struggled to do this.)
To me the risk in the NFC is that the team playing the wimpy schedule might win enough games that it will secure one of the top 2 seeds even though in terms of actual power it isn't the best team. Then there is tough competition for the other bye week slot, or there is no competition if another team goes on a dominating run. Bottom line, you need to win at least 12 games to feel like you have a shot at the bye. With a 1st place schedule there are more than four opportunities to either lay an egg or have a game stolen within the point margin.
Here is my rough power ranking of NFC teams
Elite Rosters:
Vikings
Philly (Curious to see if defense can play at same ferocity without "Wentz injury" to motivate them.)
Rams (I rate them below the other two, Goff isn't at this level yet IMO.)
Teams that can run:
SF (young, best coaching staff of this group)
Dallas (Front 7 on D good to great, best rushing team in NFL. Pass Defense / Offense weaknesses are significant.)
GB (Rogers still best QB in NFC, but rest of roster is poor)
NO (volatile team IMO)
CAR (I think this is the weakest team of the NFC S bunch)
ATL (If Defense improves could be real threat)
CHI might be an honorable mention. If they can stay healthy (their bugaboo the last two seasons.) they have a strong young roster with potential studs on both sides of the ball. Not sure if they'll develop into a winner this season, but the potential is there.
In general by week 6 we'll have an idea of who is who. There will likely be a team playing a soft schedule that cranks out wins, there almost always seems to be one. (SF seems like a likely candidate this season) The usual vet teams with great QB play will also likely be winning games. (Ironically the last few seasons GB has struggled to do this.)
To me the risk in the NFC is that the team playing the wimpy schedule might win enough games that it will secure one of the top 2 seeds even though in terms of actual power it isn't the best team. Then there is tough competition for the other bye week slot, or there is no competition if another team goes on a dominating run. Bottom line, you need to win at least 12 games to feel like you have a shot at the bye. With a 1st place schedule there are more than four opportunities to either lay an egg or have a game stolen within the point margin.
Here is my rough power ranking of NFC teams
Elite Rosters:
Vikings
Philly (Curious to see if defense can play at same ferocity without "Wentz injury" to motivate them.)
Rams (I rate them below the other two, Goff isn't at this level yet IMO.)
Teams that can run:
SF (young, best coaching staff of this group)
Dallas (Front 7 on D good to great, best rushing team in NFL. Pass Defense / Offense weaknesses are significant.)
GB (Rogers still best QB in NFC, but rest of roster is poor)
NO (volatile team IMO)
CAR (I think this is the weakest team of the NFC S bunch)
ATL (If Defense improves could be real threat)
CHI might be an honorable mention. If they can stay healthy (their bugaboo the last two seasons.) they have a strong young roster with potential studs on both sides of the ball. Not sure if they'll develop into a winner this season, but the potential is there.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
- Location: Hawaii
- x 151
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
I think I would put NYG and DET above CHI. Maybe even TB.mansquatch wrote: ↑Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:14 am Our veteran defense is certainly an early season advantage when offenses are less crisp. I think facing Green Bay early is helpful in this regard also. Obviously this assumes we stay healthy.
In general by week 6 we'll have an idea of who is who. There will likely be a team playing a soft schedule that cranks out wins, there almost always seems to be one. (SF seems like a likely candidate this season) The usual vet teams with great QB play will also likely be winning games. (Ironically the last few seasons GB has struggled to do this.)
To me the risk in the NFC is that the team playing the wimpy schedule might win enough games that it will secure one of the top 2 seeds even though in terms of actual power it isn't the best team. Then there is tough competition for the other bye week slot, or there is no competition if another team goes on a dominating run. Bottom line, you need to win at least 12 games to feel like you have a shot at the bye. With a 1st place schedule there are more than four opportunities to either lay an egg or have a game stolen within the point margin.
Here is my rough power ranking of NFC teams
Elite Rosters:
Vikings
Philly (Curious to see if defense can play at same ferocity without "Wentz injury" to motivate them.)
Rams (I rate them below the other two, Goff isn't at this level yet IMO.)
Teams that can run:
SF (young, best coaching staff of this group)
Dallas (Front 7 on D good to great, best rushing team in NFL. Pass Defense / Offense weaknesses are significant.)
GB (Rogers still best QB in NFC, but rest of roster is poor)
NO (volatile team IMO)
CAR (I think this is the weakest team of the NFC S bunch)
ATL (If Defense improves could be real threat)
CHI might be an honorable mention. If they can stay healthy (their bugaboo the last two seasons.) they have a strong young roster with potential studs on both sides of the ball. Not sure if they'll develop into a winner this season, but the potential is there.
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
- Location: Coon Rapids, MN
- x 117
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
I'm not sold on DET, but I agree on the Giants. Curious to see what happens with their defense. TB still needs to prove it. They were supposed to be a darling last year, yet the completely fell apart.808vikingsfan wrote: ↑Tue Jul 17, 2018 5:01 pm I think I would put NYG and DET above CHI. Maybe even TB.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:46 pm
- x 5
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
Personally- I don't see the Rams regressing at all. I think they are going to be very strong. Sean McVey can coach his rear off and that team has clearly bought in. It will be interesting to see how much Jared Goff has progressed.
That division should be a fun one to watch- but I think LA comes out on top and are a contender to win the NFCC and represent in the SB.
That division should be a fun one to watch- but I think LA comes out on top and are a contender to win the NFCC and represent in the SB.
Boomer Sooner
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
First place schedule is only 2 games. Not a big difference. IF, those teams are the same as last year, which often they are not. For example.Purple Domination wrote: ↑Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:16 pm I agree this is a big factor. Your statement about momentum is what worries me about our first 5 games. All of them are tough and it’s important to get off on decent footing!
In 2017
Packer played Cowboys and Seahawks. 1st place teams from the year before.
Vikings played Redskins and Rams.
IN 2018
Packer play Redskins and Falcons
Vikings play Eagles and Saints.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
San Frans fist 7 games. Vikings, Lions, Chiefs, Chargers, Cardinals, Packers, Rams. IF they are even close to .500 then they are a good team.mansquatch wrote: ↑Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:14 am Our veteran defense is certainly an early season advantage when offenses are less crisp. I think facing Green Bay early is helpful in this regard also. Obviously this assumes we stay healthy.
In general by week 6 we'll have an idea of who is who. There will likely be a team playing a soft schedule that cranks out wins, there almost always seems to be one. (SF seems like a likely candidate this season) The usual vet teams with great QB play will also likely be winning games. (Ironically the last few seasons GB has struggled to do this.)
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:07 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
- x 59
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
Yikes, that is challenging. I am curious how the Cards will be this year with Bradford. I will be rooting for him this year in all games but one. If he can play all 16 games he should have a decent opportunity. Although you have to believe that Fitz will drop off sometime.
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
The first thing that led me there is I don't think 3 teams from the NFC South make it again this season. The panthers and Falcons both have easier schedules. The saints are tied with the 2nd most difficult.The teams were so close in talent that I think the strength of schedule pushes them to 3rd. The Saints dropped both games to the Falcons last year and split with the Panthers. I think Atlanta takes the NFC South the Packers and Rams have better chances of getting those wild card spots.Purple Domination wrote: ↑Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:13 pm Interesting. Do you see this because of an age related Drew Brees drop off? They have a strong crop of rookies from last year that will only be one year more experienced.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:06 pm
- Location: Kathleen, GA
- x 15
- Contact:
Re: Offseason Thoughts on Our NFC Compatriots
Interesting tid bit from the article Cliff linked:Cliff wrote: ↑Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:21 am The first thing that led me there is I don't think 3 teams from the NFC South make it again this season. The panthers and Falcons both have easier schedules. The saints are tied with the 2nd most difficult.
The teams were so close in talent that I think the strength of schedule pushes them to 3rd. The Saints dropped both games to the Falcons last year and split with the Panthers. I think Atlanta takes the NFC South the Packers and Rams have better chances of getting those wild card spots.
3 of the last 4 Super Bowl champs had the 10th hardest schedule (the 4th team had the 9th hardest). This year there’s 4 way tie at 8th place (so it encompasses 8-11).
The Vikings are one of the teams in that tie. This is our year! Skol!