Jordysghost wrote:
Jordysghost wrote:
Yea, not like we almost tied up one of the best Ds in the league after trailing 37-14 or anything. Not like we beat one of the best Ds in the league earlier in the year either..
The one thing I think will help you guys alot, is that the Packers really don't like playing on the road, and I think in TCF that will help you, but if it comes down to week 17 in GB it is going to be a tough challenge for the Vikes.
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
My point was, they lost 2 games in a row, to teams with really good defenses. Why are most of your post either sarcastic, or trying to start something with other members of this board. Do you get points on a Packer board for being a pain in the A over here?
Jordysghost wrote:
I dont post with the intention of starting crap with other board members ever, jfyi.
Yes, they did, but i reject the premise that they 'cant' beat a top rated Defense, mainly because they already did, and partly because of the effort they poured upon the Panthers D in the closing moments of the game today, if i misunderstood your point, or took what you said out of context, then I apologize.
Where did the words 'can't beat a top rated Defense' come from? I read 'Don't like playing playing teams with a good D.' I haven't followed the Packers, but it seems you lost two in a row and beat one earlier against good defenses. That puts you 1-2 against good defenses which qualifies for 'don't like playing'. You've admitted you don't like playing on the road and you're 2-2 on the road. So if they don't like that at .500 how could they possibly like playing good D's at 1-2???
You are rejecting a premise that you alone have put forward in this thread. And from where I sit you have absolutely confirmed the OP's position.
But you seem respectful in your attempts to defend your position which I sincerely appreciate. But you'll forgive me if I sincerely state what I see.