J. Kapp 11 wrote:
Are you kidding me? Do you honestly believe all parents hit their kids?
I won't criticize people who spank their kids. I will say that my wife and I never needed it, and our kids were among the best-behaved you could possibly imagine. My youngest is a father now, and he's the most patient, loving dad I've ever seen. All I'm saying is that you don't HAVE to hit your kids to be successful as parents. But some parents spank their kids, and that's their business.
But I have to say, I'm sickened by this. I'm reading reports that AP was proud of his kid because he took "about five more lashes than normal" and "didn't drop a tear." More than normal? As in, we do this all the time? I guess I didn't anticipate something like this from a guy who is, by most accounts, a great guy.
Corrected the post (per PurpleHazes post)
Joe - Kudos for your post. I am not on the other side of the discussion (more like 90 degrees away). My daughter is one I would classify as one of the best behaved kids, and I frequently get compliments on her conduct. I am very proud of her, and I constantly tell her these things. Is she perfect? No, and that is why in the past I
have spanked her. I have two rules for spanking:
1) Never with an implement (always open hand and always on the buttocks); and
2) Never angry when administered.
So while we might disagree on whether we should
ever administer physical punishment, we agree that this is too far. After my daughter turned around 8 or so, I no longer spanked her. Not because I had some philosophical belief against it, but because I knew my daughter well enough to know that other (in this case, non-physical) discipline was actually
more effective in motivating her to behave the way that was best. I won't criticize those who believe you should
never strike a child, especially when there are those who do administer some form of discipline and that discipline is effective. Some would argue this discipline is equally or more effective than corporal punishment. Who am I to argue? I know that inflicting this type of injury to a child (whether intended or not) appears to violate Texas law, so I actually admire the Vikings for 'deactivating' Peterson for Sunday's game. By being 'deactivated' Peterson still gets his pay (He's not been convicted of anything yet) and still has my team taking the 'moral high road' by not having him play on Sunday.
My guess is Peterson will get at least a 6 game suspension (if not longer) out of this if he is convicted.