Again, we dont know if "that's what he actually did". I would have to imagine that given as much as the Vikings investigated it, there's a lot more to the story that you have no idea about. You are automatically assuming he was guilty and calling him a rapist. I guess I can call Ray Lewis a murderer, Dalvin Cook a woman beater, etc. Even though they were never proved to be guilty. That's fair?StumpHunter wrote: ↑Wed May 04, 2022 6:51 amWas it really important to challenge my stance about not wanting a child rapist on the team? To the point you diminished what he did by claiming it could have been consensual between a 15 and 13 year old or that they were "just playing doctor"? I sort of understand the people who have to ignore the charges to be able to continue to follow the team, but defending what that monster actually did? That is just plain evil.VikingsVictorious wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am
I'd give our draft a solid B+ and I'm excited to see how the new players work out. Sorry for getting into it a bit with Stump, but I don't like just letting him go unchallenged.
Have your questions about it, sure. But to sit here and call the guy a rapist and say he did this or did that, is not fair at all IMO. Just my two cents.