Page 1 of 2

0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 11:28 am
by PacificNorseWest
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/sport ... .html?_r=0
1992 SAN DIEGO CHARGERS It might seem hopeless for the Giants, but things looked far worse for this Chargers squad. After going 4-12 in the 1991 season, San Diego opened 1992 being outscored by a 95-29 total en route to an 0-4 record. An emergency preseason trade for quarterback Stan Humphries — the incumbent starter, John Friesz, was injured — was looking to be a bust and Bobby Ross, who had won a share of the national championship with Georgia Tech in 1990, was not impressing in his first stint as an N.F.L. head coach.

The Chargers’ run to the postseason started modestly, with a 17-6 win over the Seattle Seahawks, a team that would finish the season with a 2-14 record. But San Diego then had a bye week and emerged from it a different team. Humphries and a hodgepodge group of running backs started putting points on the board, and linebacker Junior Seau and end Leslie O’Neal led the defense. The Chargers closed the season with 9 wins in 10 games.

The only team to qualify for the playoffs after starting 0-4, the Chargers shut out the Kansas City Chiefs in the first round before they were crushed by the Miami Dolphins in the second round. Two seasons later, the core of this Chargers team went to the Super Bowl.

1995 DETROIT LIONS An 0-3 record was somewhat misleading, as the Lions had been outscored by a combined 16 points, twice losing by just a field goal. Regardless, Coach Wayne Fontes was on the hot seat, and the team was facing the defending Super Bowl champion San Francisco 49ers. Detroit attacked San Francisco through the air as Barry Sanders was unable to do much on the ground, gaining only 24 yards on 17 carries. The game was close, but Detroit held on to win, 27-24, when a last-second field goal attempt by the 49ers’ Doug Brien hit the right upright.

The win did not provide much momentum; through nine games, Detroit was 3-6. But something clicked, and the Lions closed the season with a seven-game winning streak that included two wins over the Chicago Bears, a team they held off for a wild-card spot by one game. Improved play by the Lions’ defense, the typical brilliance of Sanders, and a then-record 123 receptions by Herman Moore helped Detroit finish 10-6.

The magic did not last. Detroit lost to the Philadelphia Eagles in the first round of the playoffs, 58-37. The seemingly improved defense allowed 31 points in the second quarter, continuing Detroit’s postseason futility, a drought that stretches back to 1957.

1998 BUFFALO BILLS Unless the Giants have an undersize 36-year-old backup with a flair for the dramatic tucked away somewhere, it is hard to relate their situation to that of the 1998 Bills, who rode Doug Flutie to the playoffs after struggling with Rob Johnson, a more typical N.F.L. quarterback in terms of size and arm strength.

Johnson finished the season with a higher quarterback rating, a higher completion percentage and a better interception rate, but the Bills went 7-3 in Flutie’s starts and only 3-3 with Johnson starting.

With a 10-6 record in what was Wade Phillips’s first season as coach, Buffalo went on to lose to the Miami Dolphins in the first round of the playoffs. And the quarterback controversy was never fully resolved. Johnson refused to accept that he had become a backup, and he and Flutie continued to battle for the job in 1999 and 2000, with Johnson earning a Pyrrhic victory when Flutie signed with San Diego in 2001. But it is Bills fans who have suffered: Buffalo has not played a postseason game since 1999.

- Chargers got hot after their early bye week, which is where the Vikings are

- Lions lost a lot of close games early by a combined 16. Vikings have lost by a combined 15 points

- Bills were sparked by a change at quarterback

All of these are viable scenarios in my opinion so before everyone comes in here with their bad attitudes and negative opinions, well....Shove it! :D

It ain't over 'til it's over, baby!

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 11:40 am
by TheFoxInDetox
Thats the spirit!!! :smilevike:

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:00 pm
by maembe
So three teams in 21 years? We've got this one in the bag!

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:19 pm
by mondry
Yeah, it's not over yet, they can put it together and get on a roll, that's pretty much what they did last year. Maybe Cassel provides the spark or someone else steps up. Maybe we get Felton back and the run game looks like the end of last year for the next 13 games?

The main reason there aren't many 0-3 teams that do well is because they actually are terrible teams. Maybe we fall into that bracket, but at the same time, we do have a lot of talent to work with and Rhodes, Floyd, and Patterson all could have a larger impact than they are right now so we have some untapped potential as well. If Bishop get's more playing time at LB and maybe mauti or hodges can show something that'd be huge as well. All of that -could- come together and form a solid unit. Or it could easily remain the same and we're talking about a top draft pick, time will tell.

They really need to beat the steelers though, if they can go 1-3 into the bye, get everyone healthy, and know what they need to fix and work on maybe they can make the run.

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:03 pm
by Laserman
:roll: :rofl: :? Yeah, right

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:05 pm
by indianation65
One of those times I don't want to believe "You are what you are," even though I think it daily in all aspects of life.

...wisdom

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:56 pm
by 9man
:thumbsup: That is all

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:14 am
by Orion
Yeah! being able to cite 3 cases in decades of playing ought to galvanize the Vikings!

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:17 am
by JellyBean2144
Yeah 0-3 is bad but we can get it going to turn things around. But if we have that sorry effort like we did against the Browns, we might as well throw in the towel.

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:35 am
by radar55
Well aaaaallllll righty then

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:39 am
by radar55
Were 0-3 playing some of the worst football in the entire NFL so apparently this must have been Fraziers master plan.......lull everyone into believing that we suck and then we will have the league right where we want em..............

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:41 am
by radar55
get those playoff tickets ready

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:17 am
by PacificNorseWest
Worst football in the entire NFL? It's not great, but it's not like the NFC is light-your-hair-on-fire dominant that everyone expected. There's W's to be had, gentlmen.

7th best scoring offense in the NFL, baby.

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:39 am
by Funkytown
PacificNorseWest wrote:7th best scoring offense in the NFL, baby.
Why are they giving our offense credit for all of the points we scored?

Re: 0-3? No Problem...

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:42 am
by PacificNorseWest
Just sayin'...We'll nitpick and I'm not the biggest fan of Ponder, but the team is scoring points. 0-3 teams need some positivity, no?