Page 1 of 2
A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:50 am
by dead_poet
Was it just me, or did the offensive line play noticeably better in the second half? And, oddly enough, that's when Christian Ponder suddenly did his best to look like an NFL quarterback. There just might be a correlation? Anybody notice if the Bears stopped bringing pressure or if the line just manned up and have the best protection they've had all year?
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:57 am
by soflavike
dead_poet wrote:Was it just me, or did the offensive line play noticeably better in the second half? And, oddly enough, that's when Christian Ponder suddenly did his best to look like an NFL quarterback. There just might be a correlation? Anybody notice if the Bears stopped bringing pressure or if the line just manned up and have the best protection they've had all year?
I know I would have questioned the OL's manhood at halftime of that game. Don't know if it was coaches or players, but someone got their attention. They definitely stepped it up and gave Ponder room to work.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:11 am
by Mothman
dead_poet wrote:Was it just me, or did the offensive line play noticeably better in the second half? And, oddly enough, that's when Christian Ponder suddenly did his best to look like an NFL quarterback. There just might be a correlation? Anybody notice if the Bears stopped bringing pressure or if the line just manned up and have the best protection they've had all year?
As far as I could tell, it was the latter but there was a noticeable difference.
The aspect of the game that stood out to me most in the first half was the poor o-line play. From the stands, they just looked painfully overmatched and I was beginning to despair about the team's chances to win the game because I just didn't think Peterson was going to get the running room he needed or that Ponder would get the time he needed. However, the line played much better in the second half and the Bears fans around me noticed it too. As you said, I don't think it's a coincidence that Ponder looked better behind better protection.
On a related note, there were some plays where Cutler had all day to throw. The Bears o-line has definitely improved.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:52 am
by dead_poet
Mothman wrote:As far as I could tell, it was the latter but there was a noticeable difference.
Well, that begs the question...WHAT got them to play this well? It's frustrating to realize they have this potential. Where has it been and how do they harness it for four quarters?
On a related note, there were some plays where Cutler had all day to throw. The Bears o-line has definitely improved.
It wasn't pretty. Several of the Bears' red zone plays and the long TD to Marshall it was particularly noticeable. There hasn't seemed to be a steady flow of pressure this season, which is frustrating when that's been our defensive strength. Also, our linebackers continue to be non-factors. There are a lot of holes on this defense. It seems like when one gets filled, two others open up. I know this is getting too far ahead of ourselves, but aside from possibly guard and QB, LB, DE and DT are going to be priorities in the next draft.
Cook, so far, hasn't looked like a guy that's deserving of a contract extension, either. Of course, due to the Vikings' lack of options outside of Rhodes, he'll probably get one. Plenty of time to improve, I suppose. I hope it happens.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:52 am
by mansquatch
Yeah our lack of pass rush is becoming a real headache. Also our CB are inconsistent. I know Brandon Marshall is a beast, but after watching the Seattle Secondary (which is really good) it leaves something to be desired. Our guys are big and physical, but we are just not seeing the playmaking on the outside. (sans the tip by Rhodes, great recovery) Harrison Smith is awesome, but if he hadn't of been there to make that pick, it would have been a TD, Robinson was totally beat.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:57 am
by dead_poet
mansquatch wrote:Robinson was totally beat.
I know it's early, but he's looking like a complete bust. Team expected big things. Was hoping he'd also win the PR job due to his speed. Something isn't clicking and the secondary is hurting due to lack of other options.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:18 am
by The Breeze
I noted in another thread that we ran much more play action in the second half, as well executing a few drop off passes, quick hits to WRs and more 3 receiver sets. I think that also helped the line and Ponder some.
But both lines got beat IMO, except for some stretches here and there. The D-line is not covering up the youth behind them the way we'd hoped. And we are getting gashed by RBs....both running and receiving to the tune of 400+ yds in 2 games!
Boy, do we miss Winfield. Plus, Bishop and Mauti need to see the field at some point. I can't by that these starting LBs are just going to start playing over their heads. They just aren't that good.
#1 offseason priority is LB.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:22 am
by dead_poet
Cordarrelle Patterson replaced Simpson to start the #Vikings second drive, but played just six snaps, still fewer than Webb.
Bishop: 2 snaps
Mitchell: 25
Both out when in nickel (most of the time)
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:48 am
by Mothman
dead_poet wrote:Well, that begs the question...WHAT got them to play this well? It's frustrating to realize they have this potential. Where has it been and how do they harness it for four quarters?
I have no idea but they were brutal in the first half so the difference in their performance from one half to the next really stood out to me. The defense was markedly better in the second half too. Aside from the turnovers (which, admittedly, were big plays) I thought the defense was pretty lousy in the first half too.
It wasn't pretty. Several of the Bears' red zone plays and the long TD to Marshall it was particularly noticeable. There hasn't seemed to be a steady flow of pressure this season, which is frustrating when that's been our defensive strength. Also, our linebackers continue to be non-factors. There are a lot of holes on this defense. It seems like when one gets filled, two others open up. I know this is getting too far ahead of ourselves, but aside from possibly guard and QB, LB, DE and DT are going to be priorities in the next draft.
Cook, so far, hasn't looked like a guy that's deserving of a contract extension, either. Of course, due to the Vikings' lack of options outside of Rhodes, he'll probably get one. Plenty of time to improve, I suppose. I hope it happens.
I hope so too. They definitely have to play better on that side of the ball.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:26 am
by dead_poet
@TomPelissero
Watched #Bears final drive again. Definitely at least two plays #Vikings aren't all playing the same defense. Brutal time for breakdowns.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:45 am
by mondry
It's a whole lot of what came first? The chicken? the egg? or the chicken? maybe the egg? possibly the chicken?
Was it more of the formations / 3 WR sets and less of the condensed zach line lead runs that helped the o-line which helped Ponder?
Was it Ponder making more plays both with his arm and a couple nice runs that fired him up and fired the team up and allowed him to get in a rhythm?
Was it the line getting their crap together for some inspired blocking?
Was it Musgrave calling the right plays to take advantage of what the bears were doing and that put Ponder and the line in a better situation to succeed?
That is what is so maddening about this team because it happened last year for a stretch as well. It feels like everything from the top down is under performing whether it's play calling, formations, QB play, O-line, or the WR's (though the WR's have been a strong point I'd say this year) to the point where they look border line incompetent. Then all of a sudden it's like everything comes together and they play nearly lights out.
Realistically it's probably all 4 of those things combined to some extent. At least until we get felton back those condensed formations just haven't been too hot for us. I'm trying to remember that outside of rudolph and AD, our offensive weapons are still fairly new. Simpson and wright were here for 1 year and simpson was limited most of that time. Jennings and Patterson are brand new and if you notice Tom Brady looks "human" relying on his rookies and new faces.
Point is it takes Musgrave a little bit to figure out how to use all these guys and of course the Chemistry between them and Ponder is still a work in progress. We've got a squishy part of the schedule coming up and it's been said it looked like we finally came out of preseason mode so if that's the case, look for us to get back to 2-2 here.
I do think we need to get ponder involved from the get go though, whether that's with passes, some boot leg designed runs, or whatever. He just seems to respond more when we get him into the action and just playing FOOTBALL rather than the calculated "I can't make a mistake" mode that ironically leads to tons of mistakes...
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:52 am
by dead_poet
mondry wrote:It's a whole lot of what came first? The chicken? the egg? or the chicken? maybe the egg? possibly the chicken?
Was it more of the formations / 3 WR sets and less of the condensed zach line lead runs that helped the o-line which helped Ponder?
Was it Ponder making more plays both with his arm and a couple nice runs that fired him up and fired the team up and allowed him to get in a rhythm?
Was it the line getting their crap together for some inspired blocking?
Was it Musgrave calling the right plays to take advantage of what the bears were doing and that put Ponder and the line in a better situation to succeed?
That is what is so maddening about this team because it happened last year for a stretch as well. It feels like everything from the top down is under performing whether it's play calling, formations, QB play, O-line, or the WR's (though the WR's have been a strong point I'd say this year) to the point where they look border line incompetent. Then all of a sudden it's like everything comes together and they play nearly lights out.
Realistically it's probably all 4 of those things combined to some extent. At least until we get felton back those condensed formations just haven't been too hot for us. I'm trying to remember that outside of rudolph and AD, our offensive weapons are still fairly new. Simpson and wright were here for 1 year and simpson was limited most of that time. Jennings and Patterson are brand new and if you notice Tom Brady looks "human" relying on his rookies and new faces.
Point is it takes Musgrave a little bit to figure out how to use all these guys and of course the Chemistry between them and Ponder is still a work in progress. We've got a squishy part of the schedule coming up and it's been said it looked like we finally came out of preseason mode so if that's the case, look for us to get back to 2-2 here.
I do think we need to get ponder involved from the get go though, whether that's with passes, some boot leg designed runs, or whatever. He just seems to respond more when we get him into the action and just playing FOOTBALL rather than the calculated "I can't make a mistake" mode that ironically leads to tons of mistakes...
I agree with your last part, almost to the point where I'd like to see some hurry-up, up-tempo stuff. He needs to get out of his own head and just PLAY. With how smart he supposedly is, he might be TOO smart for his own good and overthinks everything. At times (the first half of the game, for example), he just seems to play so technical and robotic. I dunno if I can really put my finger on it. But this Good Ponder Atrocious Ponder act is really getting old.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:31 pm
by The Breeze
I agree with Mondry and DP. Lots has to go right for a team to succeed, and there is always 11 other guys trying to prevent it.
Ponder needs to be reacting more and thinking/worrying less.
If the conservative mantra becomes a cornerstone for playing not to lose and worrying about job security then they've lost their jobs already. If you want your team to go down fighting you have to give them a fighting chance.
Just like you can have a ball control offense that is not run heavy, you can also turn Ponder loose to make plays that don't involve any more risk for mistakes.
The ideas of some designed runs for him and more no huddle stuff are good ones IMO.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:46 pm
by dead_poet
Frazier on Patterson not being on the field: "We're going to get that rectified." Said it shouldn't be the case again.
Re: A tale to two halves
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:10 pm
by mansquatch
you know that 2nd half was the first time since 2011 where I felt like the coaches were letting Ponder just be Ponder and play his game. Admittedly he had/has plenty to learn, ie stepping up in the pocket and making a play with his arm. However, on Sunday his legs were an asset and not happy feet. Good to see.
Really worried about the LB and CB right now...