Page 1 of 1

75.27

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:00 pm
by purplehaze
Well, like I said purplehaze is gonna post his rating after every game. Slightly better than last week but still sucks. That is all.

Re: 75.27

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:04 pm
by LA Viking
80.4.

Cassel's career rating (for those clamoring for Cassel).

Re: 75.27

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:06 pm
by purplehaze
LA Viking wrote:80.4.

Cassel's career rating (for those clamoring for Cassel).
And Plunders Career is 76.4 :lol:

Re: 75.27

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:14 pm
by LA Viking
purplehaze wrote: And Plunders Career is 76.4 :lol:
Right, so we have Mediocre 1 and Mediocre 2, and before we put in Mediocre 2 - who has had 5 or so seasons to show his mediocrity, let's give Mediocre 1 two full seasons.

Re: 75.27

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:15 pm
by purplehaze
LA Viking wrote: Right, so we have Mediocre 1 and Mediocre 2, and before we put in Mediocre 2 - who has had 5 or so seasons to show his mediocrity, let's give Mediocre 1 two full seasons.
I agree except Cassel did not have AD.

Re: 75.27

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:18 pm
by CalVike
Glazer reported today the leash will be short. Accountability is big with me. I'd like to see it with the Vikings QB position this season. I'm not calling for a benching yet. But soon if he cannot lead the team to wins and displays the maddening inconsistency that others on this Board have so eloquently described.

Re: 75.27

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:43 am
by King James
Boon wrote:
Yeah, good comparison....

Ok he's no Adrian Peterson but JC is still one of the best RBs in this league. If there was a list of RBs ranked from 1 to 10 for this season I bet he would be in the top 5. He ran for 1500 yards last season, coming off an ACL injury. So they had a running game. I thought their O-Line was the most terrible in the league, yet Charles still found way to make plays.

Re: 75.27

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:00 am
by allday1991
Purplemania wrote:I think just like how last week's rating didn't justify how bad Ponder did, this week's rating doesn't tell the story about how well Ponder did (in the 2nd half that is). Overall, the performance was average at best, but the fact that Ponder played good in the second half left a good taste in my mouth so I'm going to enjoy and pretend like this will continue onto next week and the rest of the season.
But, has it ever? the only thing is he consistent at is being inconsistent.

Re: 75.27

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:04 pm
by PurpleKoolaid
80 PurplePride 84 wrote: No but he did have Jamaal Charles.
So Cassel saw 8-10 in the box every down in KC?

Re: 75.27

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:32 am
by Reignman
Ponder rankings through 2 games.

rank CATEGORY stat (league average)
29th in RATING with 66.9 (89.3)
27th in CMP with 34 (46.5)
27th in ATT with 58 (74.7)
27th in PCT with 58.6 (62.3)
23rd in YDS with 463 (543.1)
23rd in TD with 2 (3.5)
23rd in TD% with 3.4 (4.6)
31st in INT with 4 (1.9)
32nd in INT% with 6.9 (2.5)
12th in YPA with 7.98 (7.27)
6th in YPC with 13.62 (11.68)

only rated higher than Freeman (63.0), Weeden (62.0), and Geno Smith (55.2)

Re: 75.27

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:30 pm
by Reignman
edit: ooops wrong thread