J. Kapp 11 wrote: I would agree with you that Matt Cassel's history is up-and-down, but there's one thing that has to be taken into account. His history also shows the ability to play well for long stretches, which backup-only types typically aren't capable of.
In 2008, the year he replaced an injured Tom Brady, he had 10 of 15 starts that were at or above league average for QBR. This despite never having started an NFL game and not even being a starter in COLLEGE (he rode the pine behind Matt Leinart). In 2010, his Pro Bowl season, 9 of his 16 starts were above league average. Add it up, and you get 19 of 31, or 61% of his starts above league average. That's very solid, consistent play for two entire seasons, no matter how you cut it. To give this level of play some comparison, Drew Brees has 8 of 14 games this season above league average, or 57%.
The other years Cassel was a starter -- 2009, 2011, and 2012 -- his stats were admittedly bottom-feeder material, with just 8 of 32 games at or above league average. So it begs the question: Why is a quarterback like Cassel so hit-or-miss? I don't know, but there is one common thread to his bad play ... it was with a very bad team.
To add to the mystery, he's on a pretty bad team again this year, yet he's played quite well. His QBR of 90.7 would place him just out of the top 10 if he had enough attempts to qualify. He would rank 8th in yards per attempt, 11th in yards per game, and he would be on pace for a 30-TD season.
So yeah, there are a lot of unknowns with Matt Cassel. But here's what we do know ... compared to what we have on the roster right now, he's easily the best QB on this team.
And despite the prevailing thought on this board, a lot of experts don't like this year's quarterback class (save for Teddy Bridgewater, who is by NO MEANS as much a certainty as Andrew Luck was, or even RGIII). That means Cassel, assuming he sticks around, is likely to be the best QB we'll have on the roster NEXT year.
Might want to get used to #16 under center.
King of Cassel
Moderator: Moderators
Re: King of Cassel
Excellent post! I've been trying to get used to Matt under center since week 4 too, and I stopped watching games completely until they put him back there. I went on a Cassel Strike!! And I'll do it again if they let anyone else start before he sucks eggs for at least 3 games straight.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4494
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Viking Country
- x 6
Re: King of Cassel
Bump for King of Cassel: Just a little facts: He gonna kick some #### against bengals next week!
He became the fifth player in NFL history to have back-to-back 400-yard passing games with a 415-yard performance against the Miami Dolphins on Nov. 23 after a 400-yard performance against the New York Jets on Nov. 13. In 2010, Cassel led the Chiefs to their first divisional championship in seven years, and earned a Pro Bowl berth in the process. He also posted a career-high passer rating of 136.3 while throwing for a career-best three touchdown passes in the Patriots' 41-7 victory over the Broncos on Oct. 20 ... His 136.3 passer rating against the Broncos ranks as the 10th best mark by a Patriots quarterback since the 1970 AFL-NFL merger
Yeahhhhh!!!


He became the fifth player in NFL history to have back-to-back 400-yard passing games with a 415-yard performance against the Miami Dolphins on Nov. 23 after a 400-yard performance against the New York Jets on Nov. 13. In 2010, Cassel led the Chiefs to their first divisional championship in seven years, and earned a Pro Bowl berth in the process. He also posted a career-high passer rating of 136.3 while throwing for a career-best three touchdown passes in the Patriots' 41-7 victory over the Broncos on Oct. 20 ... His 136.3 passer rating against the Broncos ranks as the 10th best mark by a Patriots quarterback since the 1970 AFL-NFL merger
Yeahhhhh!!!


“He's like a piece of gristle. He's got a great squirt in the hole"-- Brad Childress.
Re: King of Cassel
Nothing surprising here, just more confirmation of what we all already knew. We're more vertical and the WR's are more involved when Cassel is back there chucking the ball around. And the games are a helluva lot less painful to watch xD.
Christian Ponder
Matt Cassel
Code: Select all
start cmp att pct yds avg td in lg rate
Ponder 9 152 239 63.6% 1648 6.90 7 9 47 77.9
Cassel 5 111 197 56.3% 1387 7.04 9 4 79 85.1
Code: Select all
rec yds avg td lg rec% yard%
WR Jennings 24 274 11.42 0 27 15.79 16.63
WR Patterson 22 207 9.41 1 37 14.47 12.56
WR Simpson 21 364 17.33 0 47 13.82 22.09
WR Wright 11 169 15.36 1 38 7.24 10.25
WR Webb 2 9 4.50 0 8 1.32 0.55
TE Carlson 20 196 9.80 1 28 13.16 11.89
TE Rudolph 16 183 11.44 2 31 10.53 11.10
TE Ford 2 22 11.00 0 20 1.32 1.33
TE Ellison 2 26 13.00 1 14 1.32 1.58
RB Peterson 20 116 5.80 1 19 13.16 7.04
RB Gerhart 7 43 6.14 0 13 4.61 2.61
FB Felton 4 31 7.75 0 11 2.63 1.88
FB Line 1 8 8.00 0 8 0.66 0.49
Total 152 1648 10.84 7 47
rec yds avg td lg rec% yard%
WR's 80 1023 12.79 2 47 52.63 62.08
TE's 40 427 10.68 4 31 26.32 25.91
backs 32 198 6.19 1 19 21.05 12.01
Code: Select all
rec yds avg td lg rec% yard%
WR Jennings 25 308 12.32 3 70 22.52 22.21
WR Patterson 15 307 20.47 2 79 13.51 22.13
WR Simpson 23 322 14.00 2 51 20.72 23.22
WR Wright 7 90 12.86 1 24 6.31 6.49
WR Webb 3 24 8.00 0 15 2.70 1.73
TE Carlson 13 158 12.15 0 30 11.71 11.39
TE Rudolph 11 103 9.36 1 23 9.91 7.43
TE Ford 2 13 6.50 0 11 1.80 0.94
TE Ellison 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00
RB Peterson 7 29 4.14 0 11 6.31 2.09
RB Gerhart 4 28 7.00 0 10 3.60 2.02
FB Felton 1 5 5.00 0 5 0.90 0.36
FB Line 0 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00
Total 111 1387 12.50 9 79
rec yds avg td lg rec% yard%
WR's 73 1051 14.40 8 79 65.77 75.78
TE's 26 274 10.54 1 30 23.42 19.75
backs 12 62 5.17 0 11 10.81 4.47
"Our playoff loss to the Vikings in '87 was probably the most traumatic experience I had in sports." -- Bill Walsh
Re: King of Cassel
Thanks for doing the work on the stats. 90 and change for Cassel's passer rating this year is something we could live with pretty easily until we transition to our 'franchise guy.' (Whomever and whenever that may be...)Reignman wrote:Nothing surprising here, just more confirmation of what we all already knew. We're more vertical and the WR's are more involved when Cassel is back there chucking the ball around. And the games are a helluva lot less painful to watch xD.
<Stats snipped for brevity>
Last edited by Just Me on Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
Re: King of Cassel
Not sure where the 85 came from or what source is most reliable but http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... ssMa00.htm has him at 90.7.Just Me wrote: Thanks for doing the work on the stats. 85 and change for Cassel's passer rating this year is something we could live with pretty easily until we transition to our 'franchise guy.' (Whomever and whenever that may be...)
Re: King of Cassel
saint33 wrote:It's weird watching the Vikings with a legitimate passing game.
I nominate this for post of the year.
The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds,the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps.
Elenore Roosevelt. 1945
Elenore Roosevelt. 1945
Re: King of Cassel
Webbfann wrote: Not sure where the 85 came from or what source is most reliable but http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... ssMa00.htm has him at 90.7.
90.7 is correct. I think the source I was using hadn't factored in last Sunday's game yet. (Corrected my earlier post - Thanks for letting me know...)
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
Re: King of Cassel
The saddest part about those yardage totals is that Ponder's played nearly twice as many games! And of course the WR TD's is what stands out to me.
Re: King of Cassel
I wonder if the quality of his WRs on the teams had anything to do with it. Cassel has always liked throwing the ball to his wide outs rather than dumping off. As I've said before, I think the Vikings have four quality WRs in Jennings, Simpson, Wright, and Patterson. I'm not saying they're the best WR corps in the NFL, but these guys are athletically inclined and can make tough catches. And it appears as if Cassel has some chemistry with them. Look at how both Jennings and Patterson are getting involved in the game now.J. Kapp 11 wrote:The other years Cassel was a starter -- 2009, 2011, and 2012 -- his stats were admittedly bottom-feeder material, with just 8 of 32 games at or above league average. So it begs the question: Why is a quarterback like Cassel so hit-or-miss? I don't know, but there is one common thread to his bad play ... it was with a very bad team.
To add to the mystery, he's on a pretty bad team again this year, yet he's played quite well. His QBR of 90.7 would place him just out of the top 10 if he had enough attempts to qualify. He would rank 8th in yards per attempt, 11th in yards per game, and he would be on pace for a 30-TD season.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: King of Cassel
I have seen much improvement in the pass protection and it seems as though Loadholt is playing more consistently. Berger seems to be much better in pass protecting that Fusco. A few more upgrades and tweeks with the Draft and trades and this team will be back on track in the third and final year of the Spielman's rebuild planlosperros wrote: I wonder if the quality of his WRs on the teams had anything to do with it. Cassel has always liked throwing the ball to his wide outs rather than dumping off. As I've said before, I think the Vikings have four quality WRs in Jennings, Simpson, Wright, and Patterson. I'm not saying they're the best WR corps in the NFL, but these guys are athletically inclined and can make tough catches. And it appears as if Cassel has some chemistry with them. Look at how both Jennings and Patterson are getting involved in the game now.

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: King of Cassel
Purple bruise wrote: I have seen much improvement in the pass protection and it seems as though Loadholt is playing more consistently. Berger seems to be much better in pass protecting that Fusco. A few more upgrades and tweeks with the Draft and trades and this team will be back on track in the third and final year of the Spielman's rebuild plan
I'm not disagreeing that the protection is getting better, but watch this play and you see Cassel avoid 2 defenders....step up in the pocket....anticipating a receiver breaking open.... reset his feet and deliver a strike.
http://www.vikings.com/media-vault/vide ... 116504b52e
Now, watch it again with Ponder in your mind.....Sack or QB run.
The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds,the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps.
Elenore Roosevelt. 1945
Elenore Roosevelt. 1945
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1878
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: King of Cassel
J. Kapp 11 wrote:
The other years Cassel was a starter -- 2009, 2011, and 2012 -- his stats were admittedly bottom-feeder material, with just 8 of 32 games at or above league average. So it begs the question: Why is a quarterback like Cassel so hit-or-miss? I don't know, but there is one common thread to his bad play ... it was with a very bad team.
Cassel generally played well when he played under a good coach and with talent around him. His worst years recently with KC, he had a horrible coach, as evidenced by And Reid's commplete turnaround of that team in one season.
A successful coach needs a patient wife, loyal dog, and great quarterback - and not necessarily in that order.
-- Bud Grant
-- Bud Grant
Re: King of Cassel
They very much remind of the GB packers WR corp. Not a truly dominant one in the bunch but plenty of quick guys who just need someone to deliver an accurate ball on time 5-15 yards down the field to give them the opportunity for the catch and to pick up some YAC. I absolutely love what we have on offense as far as talent and personnel goes, if Cassel can play like he has against PIT and PHI this unit can be REALLY good.losperros wrote: I wonder if the quality of his WRs on the teams had anything to do with it. Cassel has always liked throwing the ball to his wide outs rather than dumping off. As I've said before, I think the Vikings have four quality WRs in Jennings, Simpson, Wright, and Patterson. I'm not saying they're the best WR corps in the NFL, but these guys are athletically inclined and can make tough catches. And it appears as if Cassel has some chemistry with them. Look at how both Jennings and Patterson are getting involved in the game now.
Improve the defense and coaching and this team has a real shot I think next year to turn some heads.
Re: King of Cassel
dkoby wrote:
I'm not disagreeing that the protection is getting better, but watch this play and you see Cassel avoid 2 defenders....step up in the pocket....anticipating a receiver breaking open.... reset his feet and deliver a strike.
http://www.vikings.com/media-vault/vide ... 116504b52e
Now, watch it again with Ponder in your mind.....Sack or QB run.
This is the biggest difference in the offense. The WRs aren't playing different, nor is the line. It is a tale of two QBs. One QBs panics under pressure, at times holding the ball to long and getting sacked. Other times, he tries to step up in the pocket and runs directly into the oncoming pressure. He drops his head when he feels pressure, and when he doesn't get hit, he'll almost always tuck it and run. On the other side of the spectrum, Cassel sets up nicely in the pocket and gets the ball out of his hands quickly if coverage dictates that he has a place to go with the ball. If not, he correctly feels pressure and will step up, keep his eyes down field and anticipate his receiver coming open and throw the ball to that spot.
Nothing has changed about our protection, we just have a QB who doesn't fold under the slightest glimpse of pressure like we did for the majority of the season.

Re: King of Cassel
I agree completely with this assessment. Freeman actually does this well too (in terms of movement and awareness in the pocket - not the accurate throwing part), but Cassel is clearly out-performing all our current QBs.saint33 wrote: This is the biggest difference in the offense. The WRs aren't playing different, nor is the line. It is a tale of two QBs. One QBs panics under pressure, at times holding the ball to long and getting sacked. Other times, he tries to step up in the pocket and runs directly into the oncoming pressure. He drops his head when he feels pressure, and when he doesn't get hit, he'll almost always tuck it and run. On the other side of the spectrum, Cassel sets up nicely in the pocket and gets the ball out of his hands quickly if coverage dictates that he has a place to go with the ball. If not, he correctly feels pressure and will step up, keep his eyes down field and anticipate his receiver coming open and throw the ball to that spot.
Nothing has changed about our protection, we just have a QB who doesn't fold under the slightest glimpse of pressure like we did for the majority of the season.
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!