Page 55 of 55
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 10
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:00 am
by Texas Vike
Purple bruise wrote:
Your instincts might have been right but you also was saying pretty much that Carlson sucks.
Guess he might have proved a whole lot of people that they were wrong about him, at least for one game. He needs to get more involved in games and that is obvious. Maybe this will turn out to be a good signing just like Simpson is.
Yes, that's why I pointed out my INCORRECT PREDICTION ("But Carlson showed up BIG TIME…") along with my correct one. I am not afraid of my own folly!
Like others, I have been critical of Carlson. Mostly, it bothered me that he took up a roster spot while CP84 rode pine. But, as Eli pointed out, this was a different looking Carlson. Ponder does love his TE throws, so if he's healthy I think we can look for Carlson to shine some more.
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 10
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:40 am
by Funkytown
Is it true that the Vikes finished the game with just one penalty for seven yards? I just read that.
If that's true, that's freaking amazing.
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 10
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:53 am
by Eli
MelanieMFunk wrote:Is it true that the Vikes finished the game with just one penalty for seven yards? I just read that.
If that's true, that's freaking amazing.
They didn't have Phil Loadholt on the field. That's at least two penalties a game less than usual.
Re: Redskins @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 10
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:17 am
by Mothman
Eli wrote:They didn't have Phil Loadholt on the field. That's at least two penalties a game less than usual.
