WTF were you thinking

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by Mothman »

dead_poet wrote:Reusse has some choice words to say about the issue. Worth the read.
I read that this morning and I agree. He has a point...
thatguy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5188
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:25 pm
Location: Too far from MN...

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by thatguy »

S197 wrote:We've been through this song and dance countless times over the years. How many of us were calling for Artis Hicks to get benched well before it finally happened. How about Tahi? How about Berrian?
Psh, nonsense. Bernard Berrian didn't deserve to be benched! :D
"The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it." ~Thucydides
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by dead_poet »

Jennings defended Ponder on the pick-six
He also defended quarterback Christian Ponder on the interception Ponder threw for a touchdown on Sunday, saying, "I can't put the interception on him."

"It wasn't just him. It was a play that wasn't really executed well, across the board," Jennings said. "We addressed it."

Coach Leslie Frazier said the Vikings had a go route for Jerome Simpson called on the play, and Ponder didn't get the ball where he wanted it. Simpson wasn't able to get back for the ball, and Tim Jennings stepped in front of him, taking the interception 44 yards for a touchdown.
http://espn.go.com/blog/minnesota-vikin ... autographs
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
S197
Fenrir
Posts: 12790
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 662

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by S197 »

thatguy wrote: Psh, nonsense. Bernard Berrian didn't deserve to be benched! :D
:lol:

Welcome back!
User avatar
Delaqure
Franchise Player
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:53 pm

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by Delaqure »

Laserman wrote: Couldn't have said it any better. Before the Vikings make any MAJOR moves towards being a team to be reckoned with Both the offensive and Defensive Philosophies HAVE TO CHANGE. We Play Wimp football, play not to lose girly football. Nothing will change around here until THIS changes
Man, I think you guys are right. Take a look at the Vikings of the 70s. They were an aggressive football club from the purple people eaters to Fran the man. How many blow outs did they have? They consistently had a large takeaway advantage and were huge on points scored and points allowed. They played not to just win, but to beat you hard. I too am tired of having a team that just can't be dominant nor seem to have a desire to be dominant. I blame the coaching staff for this. The defense needs to learn to ATTACK and the offense has got to get AGGRESSIVE. If we can't pick this up this year, we need a new coaching staff. This is the year for me to buy into the system or disband it. I give them the year, but if nothing changes then it's time to go for something and someone else.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by dead_poet »

Zulgad's take on the third-and-goal:
By giving Ponder no real option other than to hand the ball to Peterson, Musgrave showed zero faith in his quarterback and ends up looking no different than when Brad Childress was making sure everything was done his way. If the Vikings aren't going to utilize Ponder's brain power why are they playing him?
http://www.1500espn.com/sportswire/Zulg ... lity091813
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8636
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1074

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by VikingLord »

dead_poet wrote:Zulgad's take on the third-and-goal:
http://www.1500espn.com/sportswire/Zulg ... lity091813
I said this in another post - what makes anyone believe Ponder can do this when he consistently struggles with post-snap reads? Musgrave won't let Ponder start making pre-snap calls until he proves he can handle post-snap reads. That hasn't happened yet IMHO.

To criticize him for accepting reality is pretty harsh. Childress controlled even guys who had proven they could play QB like Brad Johnson. He deserved that criticism. But Musgrave, from where I sit, is just doing what any one of us in his position would be doing if Ponder were our QB.

I can just see where this is going to go if Ponder reverts in the Browns game. Holy smokes, it's going to get ugly. There will be significant temptation on the team to start pointing fingers. Chris Cook barely stayed away from doing that after the final play against the Bears, and if Ponder struggles again, especially if he has time to throw and open receivers, look out.
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by mosscarter »

we will beat the browns by 28 and that will only give ponder more job security.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by Mothman »

VikingLord wrote:I said this in another post - what makes anyone believe Ponder can do this when he consistently struggles with post-snap reads? Musgrave won't let Ponder start making pre-snap calls until he proves he can handle post-snap reads. That hasn't happened yet IMHO.
As I said in that thread, Ponder has already been allowed to call audibles. Drawing the conclusion that Ponder isn't allowed to make pre-snap calls based on the absence of a check-to-pass option on one play seems like a hasty generalization.
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

Mothman wrote: As I said in that thread, Ponder has already been allowed to call audibles. Drawing the conclusion that Ponder isn't allowed to make pre-snap calls based on the absence of a check-to-pass option on one play seems like a hasty generalization.
Maybe it only seems like he isn't allowed to audible because he rarely does. Or at least it appears to be that way.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by Mothman »

J. Kapp 11 wrote:Maybe it only seems like he isn't allowed to audible because he rarely does. Or at least it appears to be that way.
I think that's it and to speak to VikingLord's point (which I should have done in the previous post) you can understand why they might limit him in that area.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

Mothman wrote: As I said in that thread, Ponder has already been allowed to call audibles. Drawing the conclusion that Ponder isn't allowed to make pre-snap calls based on the absence of a check-to-pass option on one play seems like a hasty generalization.
I have watched and re-watched many games looking just for ponder to make audibles. I have seen 2, one was last week. How many have you seen? It cant be many. I personally don't think Ponder can even read the D, let alone know who is going to be in single coverage like most QBs.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by Mothman »

PurpleKoolaid wrote:I have watched and re-watched many games looking just for ponder to make audibles. I have seen 2, one was last week. How many have you seen? It cant be many.

I don't know. It's not many but they aren't always obvious either and I'm not focused on looking for them. I don't think he audibles much. The point was that it's not something they've completely held back from letting him do.
Your views on Ponder are pretty well documented at this point. ;)
Reignman
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1372
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:58 am

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by Reignman »

Well whether he's not allowed to call audibles or just chooses not to ... neither are a good sign. Pre snap reads should be a mandatory skill at the NFL level.
"Our playoff loss to the Vikings in '87 was probably the most traumatic experience I had in sports." -- Bill Walsh
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: WTF were you thinking

Post by dead_poet »

The key third-and-goal where Christian Ponder didn't have a pass check. 10 in box, $45M receiver singled up. pic.twitter.com/NQuq1YWs4m
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
Post Reply