You could make a similar argument about each game being unique as you could each team, and in reality this game has no bearing at all on the future apart from what fans hope to see. This game could just as easily be the first game of a long losing streak as it is any positive progress.PacificNorseWest wrote:
Well, that's fine, but you can't bunch all those teams together and equate to this team. It's a completely different team and it's its own team with its own coaching staff that is not the same as any of those other teams. You have to start from the bottom and grow. They did and they are. It's a positive signal that things are moving in the right direction.
Bottom line for me is the Vikes remain a model of inconsistency on both sides of the ball. Some good, some bad, but you can't bank on either. That is NOT the hallmark of a good team. Good teams are consistent (as are bad teams). The Vikes of 2015 are like a box of chocolates - you never know what you're gonna get. That's great for entertainment, but this team remains well below the bar needed to clear the Packers as champs of the NFC North, much less a real threat in the playoffs.