And only if his receivers broke a tackle or two on his 1-2 yard throws.mosscarter wrote:jec i wouldn't worry about ponder going 10 for 10, much less 20 for 20 for that matter. if he did go 10 for 10 it would be for about 30 yards total.

Moderator: Moderators
And only if his receivers broke a tackle or two on his 1-2 yard throws.mosscarter wrote:jec i wouldn't worry about ponder going 10 for 10, much less 20 for 20 for that matter. if he did go 10 for 10 it would be for about 30 yards total.
mosscarter wrote:jec i wouldn't worry about ponder going 10 for 10, much less 20 for 20 for that matter. if he did go 10 for 10 it would be for about 30 yards total.
At this stage of the season the defense is usually ahead of the offense, especially when there are a lot of new faces at skill positions. Hopefully he's still working out the timing with Jennings, Patterson, et al808vikingsfan wrote:some context
6 INT's in OTAs so far. Blitz drills or not, shouldn't we be a little concerned?
*raises hand* I have something! My Grandma thinks Ponder is handsome, and I think she has a little crush on him. Is that something new?Eli wrote:A thread about how they paint goal posts would be more interesting than the 500th Christian Ponder discussion this offseason. Seriously. What HASN'T been said yet?
This is funny.JEC334 wrote:Seriously guys. Is this not a Vikings message board? Isn't this where you discuss about Vikings football, players, and etc? Isn't Christian Ponder apart of the Vikings? Sue me for making another Ponder thread. I wasn't aware that we exceeded our amount of opportunities to create threads discussing Christian Ponder. And please call the cops on the person who put the gun to your head and force you to read this thread.
I know Ive been a little tough on Ponder since he arrived but I show him a little love now because he has potential. His arm strength is fine. He has shown that he can make throws when he really needs to. He has also improved moderately but surely each season. I just think he didn't have much confidence with the weapons around him.MelanieMFunk wrote: *raises hand* I have something! My Grandma thinks Ponder is handsome, and I think she has a little crush on him. Is that something new?![]()
This is funny.![]()
I will sue you for making another Ponder thread, but not because it's about Ponder...it's because you actually gave Ponder some love.Are you sick, James? Everything alright down there?!?!
I'm worried.
You do realize they won 2 of those 3 games, right? You have to look beyond the yardage totals once in a while and actually examine the games.mosscarter wrote:he single handedly lost the game in green bay. you could also put the blame on him for 3 total games passing for under 100 yards.
Just to play a little devil's advocate here, one of the big strengths about Ponder was that he was supposed to be the most "pro ready" in the draft class. I think that combined with some of the recent quick successes from other rookie QB's is why you see some impatience. I don't disagree with your notion that a QB needs time to develop, just trying to give you another perspective.JEC334 wrote:He's an average QB when it comes to learning and most QBs dont reach their prime until they get into their 30s. We will have to be patient and continue to build around.
I can't argue with that. He has definitely been inconsistent but honestly, I expect that from a young QB and the rare exception is just that: a rare exception.mosscarter wrote:don't get me wrong mothman i hope he does turn it around, but to me the only thing he has been consistent at is inconsistency.
I thunk some see the success of Joe Fkacco and expect that from every rookie QB. People forget that Peyton Manning had a 3-13 record his first season. No i am not saying Ponder will be that good but to say he won't make it isnt necessarily fair.Mothman wrote: I can't argue with that. He has definitely been inconsistent but honestly, I expect that from a young QB and the rare exception is just that: a rare exception.
And Dalton, Newton, Luck, RG3, Wilson, Kaepernick...PurpleMustReign wrote: I thunk some see the success of Joe Fkacco and expect that from every rookie QB.
It's about situations, talent and perspective. Newton and Luck were both the first picks in the draft and Luck was viewed as a once-in-a-decade prospect. Ponder's not in that class but let's not forget that he's also had success. Ponder was the QB of a 10 win playoff team last season and he was instrumental in some key wins over big-time opponents.S197 wrote:And Dalton, Newton, Luck, RG3, Wilson, Kaepernick...
I disagree. Football doesn't work that way. I know I've posted that many times before but it's true. Ponder's mistakes were very costly, no doubt, but it's a team game, won and lost by teams. That's always the case, no exceptions. I think Ponder has to shoulder a great deal of the blame for the loss but he wasn't solely responsible for it.Boon wrote:Gotta admit dude, If we even get FG's out of those two red zone picks thats a different game. Adrian eviscerated them. So yeah you can make a case that Ponder boneheaded that one down the pipes by himself
... and he landed on one of the 2 or 3 most talented teams in football.80 PurplePride 84 wrote: Kaeoernick didn't play as a rookie.