Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Moderator: Moderators
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 2:26 pm
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Oh yeah them rushing yards. Feels good man.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
the entire game turned on ponder's first INT. momentum swung and they never recovered.
- VikingLord
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
- Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
- x 1083
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Defense played very well on the road. Good enough to win.Mothman wrote: I understand that but the "Ponder sucks" excuse shouldn't shield the defense for starting the game badly. The game takes 4 quarters and the points allowed in the first count as much as the points allowed in the 4th.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
This sums up my feelings.Texas Vike wrote:Unbelievable game today.
That is a classic Vikings loss. Classic. What an absolute torture it is to be born into fandom for this f'n team.
- Texas Vike
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
- x 405
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
soflavike wrote: No, it's still on Ponder.
Oh, I agree.
But the coaches and FO will take this line of argument.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
By a landslide compared to other players or units, the bulk of this loss is on Ponder.
I don't know how you can argue that with a straight face.
I don't know how you can argue that with a straight face.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
In over five decades there's only been 7 games where a rb has over 200 yards and lost.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Frazier is just not a coach. Maybe we should hire Chip Kelly. give him a blank check! That Oregon offense would be the greatest thing ever with Webb AP and Harvin. O..M...G 

Minnesota Vikings fan from Missouri!
Skol!
Skol!
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Something smells. AD ran for 210 and Ponder passed for 2-digits again. I am sorry, but ALL other NFL QBs would be on the bench by now. This is not fixable, excusable, or acceptable. In the last few weeks the team has lost games they might have won with Webb at QB. It is indisputable. Sub 100-yd passing games are once in a decade event and we have too many.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
It's not just the points allowed, it's the TOP, the long drives allowed, etc. I'm not trying to take the heat off Ponder. He deserves it. It just drives me nuts when people try to lay the blame for a loss on one player. It always has because football is a team game.Crax wrote:Sure, but giving up 23 points to green bay isn't terrible. Our defense has also gotten two turnovers. No defense is fantastic, but 23 points puts you in the position to win against green bay due to green bays defense being nothing special(except against the vikings)
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
You just lost another road game to a division rival. Your a great coach Fraizer!!!!!!!
- VikingLord
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
- Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
- x 1083
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
You're rationalizing. Better QB play means longer, more effective drives with points scored at the end of them (versus INTs). More rest for the defense. Fewer emotionally-deflating plays.Mothman wrote: The point is that there is no reason a game is lost. There are reasons. It's always that way, in every game. You can say the 10 points allowed early aren't the reason the Vikes are going to lose this game but right now, GB is leading by 9 points. Take those 10 points off the board and who is winning?
They all count, John, whether they're scored in the first or the 4th.
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9602
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Yes, he padded them all the way to:PurpleKoolaid wrote:At least Ponder got to pad his stats with the prevent D there.
9/21 for 92 yds, 1 TD, 2 INT's
6/12 3rd down efficiency
Meanwhile, Aaron Rodgers:
27/35 for 286, 1 TD, 1 INT
9/15 3rd down efficiency
What a waste of a monster game by AD: 21 carries for 210 yds, 1 TD
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Agreed. It's time to pull the plug.CalVike wrote:Something smells. AD ran for 210 and Ponder passed for 2-digits again. I am sorry, but ALL other NFL QBs would be on the bench by now. This is not fixable, excusable, or acceptable. In the last few weeks the team has lost games they might have won with Webb at QB. It is indisputable. Sub 100-yd passing games are once in a decade event and we have too many.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
blame goes to ponder and OC!