The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

His only target on deep balls is Wallace. Thats pretty sad. Wallace is BB II. He looks like he did in Miami, he doesnt really care. And no, im not putting all the blame on Wallace. It just might be hard for Teddy to hit him mid stride if Wallace isnt running at full speed.

Teddy has OVERthrown balls too many times for the 'arm stregth' to be a main concern. Its the touch on the deep balls, just like the touch on a lot of his passes. He almost overthrew Diggs too. No, he doesnt have a huge arm. But I have seen a lot of his throws for 10-20 yards with some serious zip on them. Even yesterday. Its just the consistency isnt always there.

A little better line play, and I bet his 'touch' comes back, at least some what. Might take a few more years. Its not like we have some rising QB star waiting to take over. Most people i talked were happy as heck Teddy is coming back, and Hill wont throw another pass (hopefully). Maybe in a few years, if Teddy doesnt meet expectation, Heinicke will impress enough to start. Cant remember the last time the Vikings devolved a good QB (hopefully Teddy does of course).

Comparing his heart and toughness to Ponder is just foolishness. :rofl:
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1074

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by VikingLord »

losperros wrote: I don't believe that lack of arm strength is a big deal for Bridgewater. I've seen him overthrow too many long passes to Wallace to fault that.

The long pass inconsistency has to do with Bridgewater's inaccuracy. Greg Cosell is right to point out Bridgewater lacking touch on the deep throws. Hopefully this is something that can still be corrected with time. The team needs some of the deep passes to connect. It would really be a big lift for the Vikings offense, which still must score more points.
I totally agree with you on this point, Craig. When Bridgewater misses deep, its very often due to him *overthrowing* the receiver. It's consistent, too. He's not sometimes missing short or even wide - he's almost always missing deep. So to say arm *strength* is the issue seems to be contrary to what we see on the field. I think in this case having AD has somewhat hurt Bridgewater because with AD in the backfield defenses are playing to contain him more and the Vikings speedy wideouts are creating a reasonably large number of clear deep ball opportunties that the TV cameras and announcers aren't missing (and I'm sure the coaches aren't either).

If it can't be fixed I personally don't think Bridgewater is the answer at QB. Even if he hits 65-70% of his passes, if they are all of the short and safe variety there is no point in paying 1st round money to a QB like that. An effective QB in the NFL has to be able to find and hit on those deep routes. To the same extent, that effective QB has to also be able to find the endzone through the air consistently, which is something Bridgewater almost seems allergic to right now.

He's young, but he's getting to the point where if he's going to start doing these things, it should be starting about now.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by Mothman »

PurpleKoolaid wrote:His only target on deep balls is Wallace. Thats pretty sad. Wallace is BB II. He looks like he did in Miami, he doesnt really care. And no, im not putting all the blame on Wallace. It just might be hard for Teddy to hit him mid stride if Wallace isnt running at full speed.

Teddy has OVERthrown balls too many times for the 'arm stregth' to be a main concern. Its the touch on the deep balls, just like the touch on a lot of his passes. He almost overthrew Diggs too. No, he doesnt have a huge arm. But I have seen a lot of his throws for 10-20 yards with some serious zip on them. Even yesterday. Its just the consistency isnt always there.

A little better line play, and I bet his 'touch' comes back, at least some what. Might take a few more years. Its not like we have some rising QB star waiting to take over. Most people i talked were happy as heck Teddy is coming back, and Hill wont throw another pass (hopefully). Maybe in a few years, if Teddy doesnt meet expectation, Heinicke will impress enough to start. Cant remember the last time the Vikings devolved a good QB (hopefully Teddy does of course).

Comparing his heart and toughness to Ponder is just foolishness. :rofl:
:roll:

I can't stand that dismissive, "give no credit" attitude people apply to Ponder.

These plays don't show toughness, moxie, courage, effort, whatever else you want to call it?

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-cant-miss ... the-middle

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... -touchdown

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201311070 ... &tab=recap

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... wn-TD-pass

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... rd-TD-pass

No heart or toughness shown on any of those plays, eh? People act like the guy did nothing good at all while he was a Viking. I understand that he was a disappointment but for crying out loud, he gave it a sincere effort. Is it so hard to at least acknowledge that and give him credit for it? He took a beating at times for the team.
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by fiestavike »

Mothman wrote: :roll:

I can't stand that dismissive, "give no credit" attitude people apply to Ponder.

These plays don't show toughness, moxie, courage, effort, whatever else you want to call it?

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-cant-miss ... the-middle

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... -touchdown

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201311070 ... &tab=recap

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... wn-TD-pass

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... rd-TD-pass

No heart or toughness shown on any of those plays, eh? People act like the guy did nothing good at all while he was a Viking. I understand that he was a disappointment but for crying out loud, he gave it a sincere effort. Is it so hard to at least acknowledge that and give him credit for it? He took a beating at times for the team.
I think Ponder lacked composure. He might have been a good QB if he had it.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

Half the time he was running into his own lineman because of his happy feet. Or running straight into the arms of a blitzing LB. I dont think he's shown any more heart then any other QB. I hated every moment he was a Viking (although I cheered for him and wanted the Vikings to do well while he was our QB). I had no respect for him, and doubt many of his teammates did either. I think you and I are always going to have different opinions of him.
User avatar
chicagopurple
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1513
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
x 90

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by chicagopurple »

so, watching the replay film this week, Teddy had good protection (even Khalil did his job). His RB did a good job. His receivers ran good routes and were open....and Teddy STILL over threw, under threw, mis-timed his passes. I just dont get it. Where is the progress? We need a QB Guru brought in. You dont get alot of great potential drats for a QB and whatever the current coaches are doing isnt working for Teddy......
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by fiestavike »

chicagopurple wrote:so, watching the replay film this week, Teddy had good protection (even Khalil did his job). His RB did a good job. His receivers ran good routes and were open....and Teddy STILL over threw, under threw, mis-timed his passes. I just dont get it. Where is the progress? We need a QB Guru brought in. You dont get alot of great potential drats for a QB and whatever the current coaches are doing isnt working for Teddy......
Matt Khalifa has been good all year!
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by Mothman »

PurpleKoolaid wrote:Half the time he was running into his own lineman because of his happy feet. Or running straight into the arms of a blitzing LB. I dont think he's shown any more heart then any other QB.
Nobody said he did but it's not "foolishness" to compare his heart and toughness to that of Bridgewater. Ponder had plenty of both qualities. That's not where his game was lacking.
Lars
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by Lars »

Mothman wrote: On the contrary, that's one thing Ponder definitely had. He played hard, gave up his body to gain yardage and took a lot of punishment trying help the team win. His game definitely had issues but he had plenty of heart. Watch his effort against Redskins in 2013 and tell me again that he didn't have moxie.

Bridgewater has it too and you're right, he might become a good QB but that's hardly the only possibility and the others are increasingly worrisome, at least to me.
I always respect your opinion Jim. You pay a lot of attention to this team. All I can say is: in the end, Ponder was a bust. He had a pretty good year in 2012. He had 18 touchdown passes and 12 interceptions. Not great, but OK. But it's like he lost his confidence in 2013 and 2014. I don't know why... Maybe it was the pressure of producing at QB on a consistent basis in the NFL. In comparison Bridgewater has only 6 TD passes and has given up 6 interceptions this year. And I can understand that's very concerning to you -- and why it might be very concerning to him . But Teddy doesn't seem to have the confidence issues Ponder had after having one season under his belt (at least to this point) and that is what I'm getting at. And he wins. He's confident and comfortable even though he did not have the advantage of holding a clip board for Brett Favre for 3 years before becoming a starting QB like Aaron Rodgers.

Bridgewater is not producing like Derick Carr -- but the Viking offense is not built the same way as, for example, Oakland's offense is built. Oakland throws the ball and average of 10 more times a game than the Vikes and runs the ball 7 less times a game. The Vikings are 6th in the league in rushing attempts. Oakland is 30th. So Carr has more opportunities to shine in a pass orientated offense. That not taking anything away from him -- but it shouldn't take anything away from Bridgewater either. The Viking offense is built around the run. For better or worse, this is Adrian Peterson's team. And the Vikings have been winning more or less because of their good defense and special teams play. Bridgewater is playing well within the Vikings offensive system and that is what Zimmer is asking him to do. That's about all we can ask at this point, IMHO.

It might all fall apart in the next 8 games for the Vikings and for Bridgewater. Actually I think people in the know are expecting them to. The schedule is definitely tougher on paper. But that's why they play the games. So far, it's been a fun season.
Lars
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by Lars »

Mothman wrote: :roll:



I can't stand that dismissive, "give no credit" attitude people apply to Ponder.

These plays don't show toughness, moxie, courage, effort, whatever else you want to call it?

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-cant-miss ... the-middle

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... -touchdown

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201311070 ... &tab=recap

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... wn-TD-pass

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... rd-TD-pass

No heart or toughness shown on any of those plays, eh? People act like the guy did nothing good at all while he was a Viking. I understand that he was a disappointment but for crying out loud, he gave it a sincere effort. Is it so hard to at least acknowledge that and give him credit for it? He took a beating at times for the team.
I agree Jim. Ponder was not a total fail. But I also agree with what Peterson said last September... If Ponder had Bridgewater's poise, he probably would still be playing for the Vikings.
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by halfgiz »

Teddy just needs to start hitting open receivers. When you get open receivers, the bottom line is you have to give them a chance to make a play.
As mentioned Teddy does have a lot of good qualities. One plus we did convert in the red zone this week.
I just wonder if Turners play calling could be a little more Teddy friendly?
Lars
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by Lars »

chicagopurple wrote:so, watching the replay film this week, Teddy had good protection (even Khalil did his job). His RB did a good job. His receivers ran good routes and were open....and Teddy STILL over threw, under threw, mis-timed his passes. I just dont get it. Where is the progress? We need a QB Guru brought in. You dont get alot of great potential drats for a QB and whatever the current coaches are doing isnt working for Teddy......
The wind had something to do with it I think. Foles did not throw very accurately either. In fact, the St. Louis press placed the blame for the loss on him.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by Mothman »

Lars wrote:I always respect your opinion Jim. You pay a lot of attention to this team. All I can say is: in the end, Ponder was a bust. He had a pretty good year in 2012. He had 18 touchdown passes and 12 interceptions. Not great, but OK. But it's like he lost his confidence in 2013 and 2014. I don't know why... Maybe it was the pressure of producing at QB on a consistent basis in the NFL. In comparison Bridgewater has only 6 TD passes and has given up 6 interceptions this year. And I can understand that's very concerning to you -- and why it might be very concerning to him . But Teddy doesn't seem to have the confidence issues Ponder had after having one season under his belt (at least to this point) and that is what I'm getting at. And he wins. He's confident and comfortable even though he did not have the advantage of holding a clip board for Brett Favre for 3 years before becoming a starting QB like Aaron Rodgers.
Thanks for clarifying what you meant, Lars. I agree that Bridgewater plays with more confidence than Ponder (at least 2013-2014 Ponder). I was just disagreeing with the notion that Ponder lacked moxie.
Bridgewater is not producing like Derick Carr -- but the Viking offense is not built the same way as, for example, Oakland's offense is built. Oakland throws the ball and average of 10 more times a game than the Vikes and runs the ball 7 less times a game. The Vikings are 6th in the league in rushing attempts. Oakland is 30th. So Carr has more opportunities to shine in a pass orientated offense. That not taking anything away from him -- but it shouldn't take anything away from Bridgewater either. The Viking offense is built around the run. For better or worse, this is Adrian Peterson's team. And the Vikings have been winning more or less because of their good defense and special teams play. Bridgewater is playing well within the Vikings offensive system and that is what Zimmer is asking him to do. That's about all we can ask at this point, IMHO.


I respectfully disagree. The Vikings current offense may reduce passing attempts a little but it's not designed to limit pass production. I don't think Bridgewater is playing particularly well within the system. He's missing opportunities to hit open receivers. The team is struggling to finish drives when they get into scoring position (Walsh has attempted 21 FGs already this year and the offense has scored 14 TDs, one of the lowest totals in the league). They have about a 50/50 run/pass ratio on the year so the offense isn't so run heavy that there's not more opportunity for production out of the passing game. 6 TDs and 1500 yards in 8 weeks is simply too low, especially when accompanied by an equal number of INTs. That's passing production at the level of the "old Brad Johnson/Tarvaris Jackson" offenses under Brad Childress. I'm not saying Bridgewater is solely responsible for that low production but as QB, he plays a big role in it.

Carr has more opportunities to shine but he's also making the most of those opportunities, finding and hitting open receivers downfield, etc. I think it's reasonable to ask for and expect more than the Vikes are getting from their current QB. He's playing at a level that Vikings fans have repeatedly made clear they found unacceptable over the past decade. Why should it be considered otherwise now?
It might all fall apart in the next 8 games for the Vikings and for Bridgewater. Actually I think people in the know are expecting them to. The schedule is definitely tougher on paper. But that's why they play the games. So far, it's been a fun season.
It has been fun and hopefully, it won't fall apart. I think one of the ways to prevent that is to get more out of the passing game and that starts with Bridgewater. He has to step up and make more plays. Peterson's drawing the attention they wanted him to draw and that's helping to create opportunities. If Bridgewater can't start taking advantage of those more often, the Vikings will have yet another bust at QB.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by DK Sweets »

My faith in Bridgewater (while not complete) seems to be less wavering than the general perception. I started really trying to decide why that is, and obviously, part of it is that I'm just an optimist. I'm going to log onto this board after we get murdered by a bad San Fransisco team on MNF and tell everybody the team is fine and we can make the playoffs. That's just who I am.

But I think I'm also giving Teddy a little bit of leeway because I think his type of QB play requires some patience.

Drew Brees comes to mind (I'm not saying he can be as good as Brees, I'm just using a well known example). His game is built on accuracy, mechanics, and reading a defense. Brees took long enough to develop that SD was ready to give up on him and drafted Rivers. Brees needed more help and more time, but with the right cast he can light it up.

I think Teddy has been dealt a tough hand so far, but he doesn't seem to regress. He bounces around a bit, but I always end up having confidence in him when we HAVE to score points.

In short, I'm going to believe in him because I'm just an optimist. Outside of that, I think there are reasons why he could really surge forward with a bit more experience and a little more help.

Side note: most of our really good QBs in this league were coddled as young players. Brees, Manning, and Rodgers are good examples. Even lower tier guys like Matt Ryan, Palmer, Dalton, and currently Carr fit this. There are guys like Tom Brady, Russell Wilson, and Cam Newton whose team philosophy was defense first, but it seems like building the confidence of the QB seems to help quite a bit.


Just my three cents.
Lars
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: Vikings: Teddy Bridgewater needs more consistency

Post by Lars »

DK Sweets wrote:My faith in Bridgewater (while not complete) seems to be less wavering than the general perception. I started really trying to decide why that is, and obviously, part of it is that I'm just an optimist. I'm going to log onto this board after we get murdered by a bad San Fransisco team on MNF and tell everybody the team is fine and we can make the playoffs. That's just who I am.

But I think I'm also giving Teddy a little bit of leeway because I think his type of QB play requires some patience.

Drew Brees comes to mind (I'm not saying he can be as good as Brees, I'm just using a well known example). His game is built on accuracy, mechanics, and reading a defense. Brees took long enough to develop that SD was ready to give up on him and drafted Rivers. Brees needed more help and more time, but with the right cast he can light it up.

I think Teddy has been dealt a tough hand so far, but he doesn't seem to regress. He bounces around a bit, but I always end up having confidence in him when we HAVE to score points.

In short, I'm going to believe in him because I'm just an optimist. Outside of that, I think there are reasons why he could really surge forward with a bit more experience and a little more help.

Side note: most of our really good QBs in this league were coddled as young players. Brees, Manning, and Rodgers are good examples. Even lower tier guys like Matt Ryan, Palmer, Dalton, and currently Carr fit this. There are guys like Tom Brady, Russell Wilson, and Cam Newton whose team philosophy was defense first, but it seems like building the confidence of the QB seems to help quite a bit.


Just my three cents.
I'm with you. It's too soon to judge Bridgewater... especially since he was thrown to the wolves at age 21 as the rookie starting quarterback for the Minnesota Vikings. He has a hell of lot of pressure to produce. Now if the Vikings were 2-6 right now instead of 6-2, I think there would be a lot more angst over Bridgewater's low TD output. But that's not the case. Bridgewater is playing his role well enough to win at the moment. He has proved that he can lead the team to come from behind and win on the road in Chicago (on natural grass!). I think Jim is right to be concerned -- but I'm with you... at this point it's nice to have the luxury of feeling optimistic about the Vikings making the playoffs (and maybe winning a playoff game or two) at the half point of the season. And it seems like the potential is there for the Vikes to play much better if they can just get all the facets of their game rolling at the same time. I like their talent. They have the goods. I like their head coach. I like their "one-game-at-a-time" philosophy. It will be interesting to see how they fair against a decent pass oriented team like Oakland. Given the personality of this team, it will come down to whether the offense can control the ball and the clock while the defense rises to the occasion with lots of pressure on Derek Carr, adequate run containment, continued good tackling, and decent coverage. They likely will not win in a shootout.
Locked