Young Theodore Bridgewater

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Purpnation
Franchise Player
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:29 am

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by Purpnation »

J. Kapp 11 wrote: There it is.

Haven't had a QB with killer instinct since Favre, and that only lasted a year. At 21 years old, Teddy's gonna give us a lot more than one year.

2 years actually.

I don't see how people are still feeling negative after that win, relax! We have a 21 year old franchise QB that will continue to improve, just enjoy the ride guys, seriously.
TSonn
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2127
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:52 am
Location: Michigan
x 132

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by TSonn »

808vikingsfan wrote: another gif

https://vine.co/v/OOHqrHlWrKD
Anyone else have flashbacks to Troy Williamson dropping a wide open bomb in Denver?
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 151

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by 808vikingsfan »

Mike Wobschall‏@wobby
Bridgewater was 9 of 10 for 95 yards and 1 TD on 3rd downs in yesterday's win. #Vikings #GUMP
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
hibbingviking
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7157
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: bakersfield california

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by hibbingviking »

bridgewater is actually better during crunchtime. but he doesn't a very strong arm and isn't that accurate going deep. but he's young and getting better. his pocket presence and awareness is pretty good.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

chicagopurple wrote:You all realize that we are rank 31st in the league for our passing offense, right? Teddy has a lot to prove.....
He doesn't exactly have a many good WR's. He has one. And luckily, a good receiving TE in Ford.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1117

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

PurpleKoolaid wrote: He doesn't exactly have a many good WR's. He has one. And luckily, a good receiving TE in Ford.
I would like to see the Vikings land DaVante Parker in the draft this year. I have no clue what round he will go in though. I see him range anywhere from the 1st to the 3rd. Either way, he was Teddy's main go-to at Louisville. He's a deep ball WR standing at 6'3 and does an excellent job of getting open. He can also jump through the roof. He was hurt this year but just posted 9 for 132 yards in his first game back. Parker, Patterson, Jennings, Wright and Johnson would be a very good looking WR corps!!

Parker highlights: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYNxoIbQZg8
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by Purple bruise »

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by mondry »

Purple bruise wrote:Zimmer get in TB's face: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... turnaround
It's about that 4th down play where he escapes pressure and has an open lane to run but throws the ball away.

"Once I came over to the sideline, Coach Zimmer was right there in my face telling me to, 'Just run it! Just run it!' " Bridgewater said. "I told myself: 'What am I doing?' I know that I have the ability to keep a play alive. I know that if something isn't open down field I can take advantage of my legs and make a play."

Zimmer isn't the only one, I thought he's had a few opportunities to use his legs to pick up yards the past couple games even and especially on that play. I kept thinking to myself, maybe he has so much of the "have to be a pocket passer" mentality going through his head that he completely made his legs not an option for fear of being called a "run first" QB.

Seemed like after that play he had a few decent runs after things broke down too.

Like I said earlier in the thread, it's like the easy things are hard for him and the hard things are easy hahaha.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by DK Sweets »

In reference to the deep ball accuracy...I hate to be a downer, but he's not guaranteed to improve his touch just because he overthrows instead of overthrowing deep. Anybody remember a guy by the name of Tarvaris?

...no? Me either.

I do think he had what it takes to be a very good QB, but I do think he will peak as a Top 5-10 QB. Which is plenty good enough for me.
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by jackal »

I noticed a few times the Vikings wide outs will stop in the out patterns..

It seems like if they would have kept running the pass would be right on the money

# 12 especially
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by DK Sweets »

When I posted my original comment, I didn't realize one thread had already fallen to talking about Jackson/Bridgewater comparisons. That isn't my point, either, I'm talking specifically about the long pass accuracy and used the first player that came to my head.
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by PurpleMustReign »

jackal wrote:I noticed a few times the Vikings wide outs will stop in the out patterns..

It seems like if they would have kept running the pass would be right on the money

# 12 especially
I noticed that too. I wonder why they arr doing that?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by dead_poet »

808vikingsfan wrote:
This is an important stat. However I'd like some context, specifically how many of those completions resulted in a first down? A quarterback could post those stats after checking down to a RB well short of the first-down market, which would change the perception of that stat and Bridewater's perceived efficiency.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by Mothman »

dead_poet wrote: This is an important stat. However I'd like some context, specifically how many of those completions resulted in a first down? A quarterback could post those stats after checking down to a RB well short of the first-down market, which would change the perception of that stat and Bridewater's perceived efficiency.
Indeed. It's basically the same problem I have when I see stats about how many completions a DB or LB has allowed. Without more context about the results of those plays, the stat isn't very helpful. If a defender allows a completion that results in a 3 yard gain on third and 5 and makes the tackle short of the marker, he's actually done a good job.
MNSportsNut
Practice Squad
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 7:26 pm

Re: 21 Year Old Ted Bridgewater

Post by MNSportsNut »

dead_poet wrote: This is an important stat. However I'd like some context, specifically how many of those completions resulted in a first down? A quarterback could post those stats after checking down to a RB well short of the first-down market, which would change the perception of that stat and Bridewater's perceived efficiency.
Hmmm 9 receptions for 95 yards and a TD. The TD was a 20 yard reception if I am not mistaken. That would leave 75 yards for the other 8 ... still over 9 yards per reception. I don't remember that many 3rd and 9 or more situations. Sounds to me like we got 1 for the TD and probably 4-6 others? sounds reasonable without even looking it up.

Another thing. (Not related to Poets post) Can we put the weak arm to bed? :yawn: I believe that he has overthrown most of his long passes.
Post Reply