Page 4 of 5

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 2:35 am
by Raptorman
Wait, I have to point this out so we have one more thing to argue about. Ponders QBR for week ten was 95. Higher than any other QB this past week!

What's it mean? Well nothing really. Just wanted to point it out. And his yearly QBR is 58.7. Higher than Brady, Locker, Newton, Dalton, Flacco, Bradford, A. Smith, Griffin, Roethlisberger, Fitzpatrick, Glennon, Schaub, Tannnehill, E. Manning, and C. Palmer. Wow, just wow. Do we have franchise QB on our hands? :point:

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:02 am
by Demi
That Ponder is having a better year, that's what the hell the point is!!!
So Eli is having a terrible regular season, that should make us feel better about Ponder? Who's having a below average year and still getting "praise" from homers? :rofl:

Remember when we had the QBR discussion because ARods 300+ 3 td was a lower QBR than ponders 160 yrds no td? QBR is the biggest load of bull....even worse than qb rating. At least that goes simply by the stats. Instead of throwing in subjective nonsense...

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:01 am
by Reignman
Raptorman wrote:Wait, I have to point this out so we have one more thing to argue about. Ponders QBR for week ten was 95. Higher than any other QB this past week!

What's it mean? Well nothing really. Just wanted to point it out. And his yearly QBR is 58.7. Higher than Brady, Locker, Newton, Dalton, Flacco, Bradford, A. Smith, Griffin, Roethlisberger, Fitzpatrick, Glennon, Schaub, Tannnehill, E. Manning, and C. Palmer. Wow, just wow. Do we have franchise QB on our hands? :point:
This is just another indictment of the QBR. In fact I say it's another nail in the coffin.

Code: Select all

          starts  cmp  att  pct  yards   avg  td int rating
Bradford       7  159  262  60.7  1687  6.44  14   4   90.9
Newton         9  170  271  62.7  1970  7.27  13   8   88.3
Roethlisberger 9  218  338  64.5  2534  7.50  13  10   87.6
Locker         7  111  183  60.7  1256  6.86   8   4   86.7
Dalton        10  239  383  62.4  2861  7.47  18  13   86.7
Griffin        9  205  337  60.8  2450  7.27  12   9   83.8
Glennon        5  123  204  60.3  1165  5.71   8   3   83.1
Brady          9  194  340  57.1  2256  6.64  13   6   82.7
A. Smith       9  188  315  59.7  1919  6.09   9   4   81.4
Tannehill      8  175  289  60.6  1977  6.84  11   9   80.8
Schaub         6  150  233  64.4  1552  6.66   8   9   78.8
Ponder         6  115  179  64.2  1246  6.96   5   7   77.6  <--
Flacco         9  204  346  59.0  2307  6.67  12  11   77.3
Fitzpatrick    2   63  111  56.8   790  7.12   4   4   76.0
Palmer         9  194  316  61.4  2154  6.82  12  15   74.5
E. Manning     9  183  329  55.6  2307  7.01  11  16   68.5
Arguably most of the QB's on this list are having an off year, or are struggling by their own standards. So great, good year for Ponder = struggling year for most others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_quarterback_rating
Further controversy erupted when the Total QBR system gave the Denver Broncos' Tim Tebow a higher rating than the Green Bay Packers' Aaron Rodgers in their respective Week 5 contests in 2011. Noting that Rodgers completed 26 of 39 passes for 396 yards and two touchdowns in a win over the Atlanta Falcons, while Tebow completed four of 10 passes for 79 yards and a touchdown, and six rushes for 38 yards and a touchdown, in a loss to the San Diego Chargers, Mike Florio of Profootballtalk.com wrote that he'll "continue to ignore ESPN’s Total QBR stat."[10] Rodgers himself was surprised: "I saw the [QBR stats] and chuckled to myself. I played a full game, [Tebow] played the half. He completed four passes, I completed 26. I think it incorporates QB runs as well ... The weighting of it doesn't make a whole lot of sense."[11] ESPN's Stats and Information Group explained that Tebow's higher rating was the result of him staging a partial comeback, taking no sacks, and having positive rushing yards and a rushing touchdown, among other factors.[12][13] However, Doug Farrar of Yahoo! Sports wrote that the QBR system lacks a minimum performance frequency floor that players must meet before they can be rated, and thus it essentially penalizes Rodgers because he played throughout the entire game, while rewarding Tebow because he came off the bench in the second half in an attempt to stage a comeback
Came off the bench and attempted but failed a comeback is greater than playing the entire game and putting up huge numbers in a win. QBR = biggest crock of crap ever.

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:52 am
by jackal
Sorry Ponder would have to look like Drew Bree's for a month for me to even look his way

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:52 pm
by dead_poet
From @ESPNStatsInfo: Christian Ponder has 5th-best QBR in the NFL from the shotgun in the last 3 weeks. Has looked more comfortable there.
Now, here's the rub: #Vikings have only handed the ball to Peterson 16 times in shotgun all year. Big change for him if they were to use it.
Another crazy Ponder shotgun stat: When he's in it, as you'd expect, he sees 7 or more in the box 22% of the time. Under center, it's 79%!
Ben Goessling on Twitter

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:56 pm
by The Breeze
dead_poet wrote: Ben Goessling on Twitter

Be curious to see how those 16 runs did. I am one who thinks they should run him more out of passing formations...or at least have the option to audible into it once they get up to the LOS.

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:52 pm
by dead_poet
Christian Ponder and the shotgun
But what if the Vikings can figure out how to run effectively from the shotgun? Right now, they seem fairly predictable when they move Ponder out from under center, but might they have a solution for a couple of their problems by backing up and spreading out the defense? There are some members of the Vikings' organization who have grumbled about offensive coordinator Bill Musgrave's tendency to bunch players up on the line of scrimmage, effectively attracting more defenders and choking off space for Peterson. But in the past few weeks, Musgrave has started to open up their offense and trust Ponder to work from a formation he says he enjoys.

For the time being, that decision might provide a spark to the Vikings' offense, especially if they can make it work for both their MVP running back and their fledgling quarterback.
http://espn.go.com/blog/minnesota-vikin ... um=twitter

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:57 pm
by mondry
lol, I wonder who's been saying that for quite a while now?!?!?

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:25 pm
by S197
mondry wrote:lol, I wonder who's been saying that for quite a while now?!?!?
To Musgrave's credit, he only recently found out that putting receivers outside the hash marks isn't an illegal formation. :twisted:

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 7:28 pm
by Reignman
I found the only fair way in which we can compare Ponder to Peyton Manning. With Ponder we get to look at what he's done over full games and with Manning we only look at what he's done per quarter.

Manning has played 32 quarters of football in 2013, Ponder has 32 career starts. Off to a fair comparison already. Manning has 32 TD's in those 32 quarters, Ponder has 36 TD's in his 32 starts. At a boy Ponder, you got him there. Manning has had 3 TD passes in 3 different quarters this year, Ponder has had 3 TD's in only 2 of his career starts. Can't win em all. Ponder again has him when it comes to 2+ TD's though, he's done it 12 times in his career whereas Manning has thrown for 2+ TD's in only 9 quarters this year. Not even close. Take that Manning, our guy is slightly better per game than you are per quarter.

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 8:39 pm
by Crax
:point:

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 10:58 pm
by Reignman
The Breeze wrote:
Be curious to see how those 16 runs did. I am one who thinks they should run him more out of passing formations...or at least have the option to audible into it once they get up to the LOS.
Peterson 18 carries, 101 yards, 5.61 average, and a TD from the shotgun
Gerhart 1 carry, 13 yards, and a TD

at DET lead 7-3 1-10-MIN 20 (4:55) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right tackle to MIN 22 for 2 yards (98-N.Fairley; 79-W.Young).
at DET trail 24-34 1-10-MIN 1 (4:17) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson up the middle to MIN 4 for 3 yards (77-I.Idonije).
at DET trail 24-34 1-10-MIN 30 (2:24) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson up the middle to MIN 32 for 2 yards (54-D.Levy; 98-N.Fairley).

at CHI trail 14-21 2-1-MIN 34 (2:28) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right guard to MIN 34 for no gain (55-L.Briggs).
at CHI trail 14-21 1-10-MIN 42 (2:00) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right guard pushed ob at CHI 22 for 36 yards (55-L.Briggs).
at CHI trail 14-21 1-10-CHI 22 (1:50) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right end to CHI 20 for 2 yards (21-M.Wright).
at CHI tied 24-24 2-6-MIN 16 (14:13) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson left guard to MIN 20 for 4 yards (99-S.McClellin; 92-S.Paea).
at CHI tied 24-24 2-23-CHI 27 (9:22) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson left guard to CHI 23 for 4 yards (92-S.Paea).

vs PIT lead 34-17 3-1-MIN 33 (1:46) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right tackle to MIN 33 for no gain (94-L.Timmons).

vs CAR trail 0-14 1-10-CAR 13 (:36) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson left guard to CAR 4 for 9 yards (41-C.Munnerlyn). FUMBLES (41-C.Munnerlyn), recovered by MIN-17-J.Wright at CAR 4.

at NYG trail 7-10 2-10-MIN 30 (:30) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right guard to MIN 35 for 5 yards (57-J.Williams, 91-J.Tuck).
at NYG trail 7-23 3-1-MIN 46 (10:22) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson up the middle to MIN 48 for 2 yards (52-J.Beason, 21-R.Mundy).

vs GB trail 10-24 2-4-GB 8 (:10) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right tackle for 8 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
vs GB trail 17-41 1-10-GB 13 (4:48) (Shotgun) 32-T.Gerhart up the middle for 13 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

at DAL tied 0-0 2-4-MIN 29 (14:29) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson up the middle to MIN 33 for 4 yards (96-N.Hayden; 99-G.Selvie).
at DAL trail 0-3 2-10-MIN 48 (5:57) (No Huddle, Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson up the middle to MIN 48 for no gain (52-J.Durant, 50-S.Lee).
at DAL trail 0-3 3-6-DAL 7 (2:52) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson left tackle to DAL 5 for 2 yards (50-S.Lee).
at DAL trail 3-6 1-8-DAL 8 (2:00) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson up the middle to DAL 6 for 2 yards (97-J.Hatcher).

vs WAS trail 7-10 2-5-MIN 43 (:12) (Shotgun) 28-A.Peterson right tackle to WAS 41 for 16 yards (30-E.Biggers; 56-P.Riley).

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:23 pm
by Reignman
Stafford had 267 yards passing in the 2nd quarter alone today at Pittsburgh. Ponder has thrown for under 267 yards in 91% of his career starts, and hasn't thrown for 267 yards in a full game since week 6 last year at Washington (17 starts ago).

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:01 pm
by purplehaze
Reignman wrote:Stafford had 267 yards passing in the 2nd quarter alone today at Pittsburgh. Ponder has thrown for under 267 yards in 91% of his career starts, and hasn't thrown for 267 yards in a full game since week 6 last year at Washington (17 starts ago).
That 0-16 season for them helped them pick him #1. He already has the record for most yards passing as a Lion and soon all time in TD's. But hey, high draft picks never work out.

Re: No priase for Ponder?

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 7:33 pm
by Reignman
In his 1st 2 starts, Tolzien already has as many 280+ yard passing games in his career as Ponder.