Re: Vikings Off-Season Decisions
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:14 pm
Probably Johnson, Fusco or Loadholt, in that order.Dark wrote:If we signed an offensive lineman, who do you guys think we should replace?
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://vikingsmessageboard.com/
Probably Johnson, Fusco or Loadholt, in that order.Dark wrote:If we signed an offensive lineman, who do you guys think we should replace?
Maybe keep all three but move Johnson to a utility position where he could replace guard or tackle and find a new starter at his position.Mothman wrote: Probably Johnson, Fusco or Loadholt, in that order.
yes, exactly in that order. Let the rest be backups if they are cheap enough. As hard as I am on Ponder, he has the least amount of time in the pocket of any QB ive seen play. Put Greeen, Megatron, and PH out there and he still wont have the time to get them the ball. The deep ball takes a few seconds to develope, ponder doesnt have that.Mothman wrote: Probably Johnson, Fusco or Loadholt, in that order.
PurpleKoolaid wrote: yes, exactly in that order. Let the rest be backups if they are cheap enough. As hard as I am on Ponder, he has the least amount of time in the pocket of any QB ive seen play. Put Greeen, Megatron, and PH out there and he still wont have the time to get them the ball. The deep ball takes a few seconds to develope, ponder doesnt have that.
I have to disagree there. Actually his mobility saved his ars many times and he dumped the ball off several times saving sacks.Boon wrote: Pass protection was adequate this year. Give him some weapons
Just to clarify, he was sacked 32 times, 13th in the nfl, and i'd say about 10 or so of those, seeing every game as usual, were caused by him running out of the pocket INTO a sack for no apparent reason. Later on in the season he seemed to calm down a bit
A true pocket passer would have went past his first read, not missed wide open receivers, and not happy feet even when there was only phantom pressure.A true pocket passer would have been sacked at least twice as many times playing with the pass protection he had.
Yep that is your unprofessional biased opinion of courseDemi wrote: A true pocket passer would have went past his first read, not missed wide open receivers, and not happy feet even when there was only phantom pressure.
We could use better guards, but it is not like they were getting beat like a drum play in and play out.
I thought Fusco was the weak link by a country mile this year. Johnson's blocking was spotty, but more consistent than Fusco's. If Fusco didn't get leverage, he seemed to get manhandled. He just struck me as weak for the position. Maybe he can get stronger and more stout at the point of attack, but guard is not a place you can afford to be weak and need perfect technique every time if you want to hold your own.Mothman wrote: Probably Johnson, Fusco or Loadholt, in that order.
Loadholt is one of the best linemen on the team and is the must sign FA on the team. Letting him go would be a mistake and a golden gift to the team he goes to.chicagopurple wrote:Loadholt is a drive-killing Penalty Machine......He needs to be replaced...he has had enough time to show his worth and I don't see it. How Many motion penalties did he have this year? I lost count after the first 1000.......
We Need REAL receivers...then Ponder has one year to show that he can really play QB with the crutch of having the worlds best RB.....EVER.......
I don't worry too much about our Defense.....The Offense is the reason we arent playing any more ball this season.
joe h wrote:Greatest needs
Wr>db>backup or starting QB that is actually game day ready>guard>one more corner
Solidify these positions and we should be top of the division.
3rd best on the team lol.DarthBrooks wrote: Loadholt is one of the best linemen on the team and is the must sign FA on the team. Letting him go would be a mistake and a golden gift to the team he goes to.