Vikings Message Board.Com

I would be willing to bet any amount of anything that Rodgers won't win the MVP. That is hilarious. Tough to win the MVP when your team ends up 8-8... Unless your name is Adrian

Norv Zimmer wrote:I would be willing to bet any amount of anything that Rodgers won't win the MVP. That is hilarious. Tough to win the MVP when your team ends up 8-8... Unless your name is Adrian

Jordy's floating in an ocean of Packer Kool-Aid today.

Go Jaguars!

Norv Zimmer wrote:I would be willing to bet any amount of anything that Rodgers won't win the MVP. That is hilarious. Tough to win the MVP when your team ends up 8-8... Unless your name is Adrian

8-8 doesn't happen to the best player in the league failing injury.

Mothman wrote: Jordy's floating in an ocean of Packer Kool-Aid today.

Go Jaguars!

I feel like im tubing through a Nile river sized stream of purple koolaid, while drunkenly slurping down a pitcher of Green and Gold koolaid.

Jordysghost wrote:I feel like im tubing through a Nile river sized stream of purple koolaid, while drunkenly slurping down a pitcher of Green koolaid.

That sounds about right since the season openers are less than 48 hours away.

Mothman wrote: That sounds about right since the season openers are less than 48 hours away.

Jee, it is really axciting to read that.

Aaron Rodgers isn't the best player in the league. Not even the best QB in the league.

This seems to be getting troll-y

Norv Zimmer wrote:Aaron Rodgers isn't the best player in the league. Not even the best QB in the league.

Yes he is, and Yes he is. What other explanation could there be for him leading every single statistical passing category throughout history? (Passer rating, TD INT ratio, average yards per season, average TDs per season, career completion pct, etc. etc.)

Honestly looking at the numbers there isn't even an argument for anyone out there, not Peyton, not Brady, no one even approaches his production, nor ever has.

IrishViking wrote:This seems to be getting troll-y

Sorry, maybe I'll tone it back a fair amount.

Jordysghost wrote: Sorry, maybe I'll tone it back a fair amount.

That might be a good idea.

So, gang, about that Sam Bradford fella...

Mothman wrote: That might be a good idea.

So, gang, about that Sam Bradford fella...

He's better then your starter.

(Ducks and covers)

I feel like I just made a racist joke at a multicultural awareness rally.

Jordysghost wrote: Yes he is, and Yes he is. What other explanation could there be for him leading every single statistical passing category throughout history? (Passer rating, TD INT ratio, average yards per season, average TDs per season, career completion pct, etc. etc.)

Honestly looking at the numbers there isn't even an argument for anyone out there, not Peyton, not Brady, no one even approaches his production, nor ever has.

Rodgers is a stat whore...always was.

halfgiz wrote: Rodgers is a stat whore...always was.

What do you mean by that?