Re: Vikings at Saints Game Thread - Week Three
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:14 pm
That's two third and longs that should have got the D off the field. Weak flag but you have to know it's going to get thrown when you suplex a QB like that.
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://vikingsmessageboard.com/
Show me where the slam was buddy, I think you have your definitons messed up. It was a TACKLE, not slam. Body TACKLE.Purple Reign wrote: Just because the whistle hasn't blown yet doesn't mean you can body slam the qb.
He is one of the chosen ones.IrishViking wrote:Is there a legitimate reason that Brees wasnt flagged?
Nope!IrishViking wrote:Is there a legitimate reason that Brees wasnt flagged?
EXACTLY. Or if Brees doesn't want to be taken down hard, he should have just gone down.soflavike wrote:If Brees had flipped the ball to a RB before the whistle, the play was still alive... if the refs want to protect the QB, blow the whistle.
Sorry, but our definitions don't really matter - besides - the refs agree with my definition - not yours. When you lift someone (especially a qb) off his feet and then slam him to the ground - that is a body slam.TeddyB wrote: Show me where the slam was buddy, I think you have your definitons messed up. It was a TACKLE, not slam. Body TACKLE.
Wow good one, the refs agree? You got me. Bet you loved the 2009 game thenPurple Reign wrote: Sorry, but our definitions don't really matter - besides - the refs agree with my definition - not yours.
Regardless, Brees should have been flagged as well.Purple Reign wrote: Sorry, but our definitions don't really matter - besides - the refs agree with my definition - not yours.
If they want to put a dress on the QB, bring back in the grasp.Purple Reign wrote: Sorry, but our definitions don't really matter - besides - the refs agree with my definition - not yours.